PS:1 Wiki Dev - User contributions [en]

Club Vote Repeal

2026-03-27T01:40:30Z

Jcmertz:

==Title==
Club Vote Repeal

==Sponsor==
*[[User:jcmertz |Joe 'theJuggler' Mertz]]

==Co-Sponsors==
*Lydia Miller

==Vote Results==
Attempt 1:
Quorum: []
Yea Votes: []
Nay Votes: []
Present or Abstain: []
Result:

==Schedule==
====Proposal Date====
Date this proposal was posted to the membership and a request for a vote date was sent to the Board.

'''3/26/26'''

====Member Input====
Does the Sponsor choose to open the language of the vote for changes due to member input? (optional and can be modified at any time)

'''[ ] YES [X] NO'''

====Vote Announcement and Beginning Date of the Discussion Period====
The announcement date of the vote proposal is the beginning date of the seven-day (minimum) posting and Member discussion period. (Certain exceptional vote types have longer discussion periods. Check the Bylaws if you are unsure.) If the Sponsor has chosen to include member input, suggested edits can be made in a shared document or other collaborative vehicle until the language is locked. The sponsor can stop taking suggestions at any time.

====Language Lock Date and Start of Voting====
Five days prior to the Day of the Vote, the vote language is locked, all edits are frozen, and the language of the vote is converted to a pdf file. Ballots that include the pdf are sent to the Membership, and electronic voting begins. Note that the minimum discussion period of seven days leaves only two days for changes before the lock takes place.

====Day of the Vote====
Date the Board has assigned for the vote. The Day of the Vote is the day the vote closes.

Attempt 1:

==Background==
On January 28th, 2025, PS:1 ran a member vote, the [[Club Vote]] establishing a "Club" structure, creating a Committee for Club Oversight (CCO) and introducing new roles including Club Hosts and Club Sponsors. Under this structure, certain individuals were granted free memberships tied to their club leadership roles.

In the year following the vote, concerns have been raised that the Club structure as passed is unnecessarily complex and opaque, and that it creates a pathway for directing organizational resources, including free memberships, to specific individuals in ways that lack the transparency expected of PS:1's normal decision-making processes.

This proposal seeks to repeal the Club Vote in full and move to a simpler model for supporting community-building work at PS:1, one that mirrors the Area Host structure already familiar to the membership, and routes support through existing mechanisms like Work in Lieu of Dues (W.I.L.D.) volunteer positions and short-term scholarships where appropriate.

Members who received free memberships under the Club Vote will be granted one month of continued membership while the Board evaluates whether appropriate W.I.L.D. positions exist for them.

== Wait, isn't there another club vote right now? ==
Yes. There is a competing vote titled [[Club Vote 2026]] being run at the moment, which seeks to amend the club vote language and give out some more free memberships. The sponsors of this vote think the original club vote, and this amendment, are both too opaque and convoluted. Our belief is that the membership and the organization is better served by a volunteer structure consistent with the rest of the volunteer structure at PS:1.

==Synopsis==
This vote repeals the Club Vote from January 28th, 2025, rendering all of its provisions null and void. It grants one month of continued membership to any member currently receiving a free membership under the Club Vote, providing continuity while the Board determines whether W.I.L.D. volunteer positions are appropriate for those individuals.

The sponsor's intent, following a successful repeal is to propose, via Board vote, the creation of a Community Building Area that consolidates the functions currently distributed across the CCO, MMT, and PR. This Area would be governed by an appointed Area Host and evaluated by the same standard applied to all other Area Hosts at PS:1. Budget currently allocated to the CCO would transfer to the new Area.

==Language of the Vote==
The membership of Pumping Station: One, NFP votes to repeal the "Club Vote" from January 28th, 2025, render all portions of it null and void, allow the board to transfer any allocated budget to a newly created Community Building Area, and grant those members granted free memberships under the Club Vote one month of continued membership, while the board determines if there are appropriate Work in Lieu of Dues (W.I.L.D.) volunteer positions for them.

==Footnotes==
This vote was written in 2026 by[[User:jcmertz | Joe 'theJuggler' Mertz]] in collaboration with Claude AI for proofreading and clarity.

[[Category:Votes]]
[[Category:2025 Votes]]

Club Vote Repeal

2026-03-27T01:23:42Z

Jcmertz: Initial commit.

==Title==
Club Vote Repeal

==Sponsor==
*[[User:jcmertz | Joe 'theJuggler' Mertz]]

==Co-Sponsors==
*

==Vote Results==
Attempt 1:
Quorum: []
Yea Votes: []
Nay Votes: []
Present or Abstain: []
Result:

==Schedule==
====Proposal Date====
Date this proposal was posted to the membership and a request for a vote date was sent to the Board.

'''3/26/26'''

====Member Input====
Does the Sponsor choose to open the language of the vote for changes due to member input? (optional and can be modified at any time)

'''[ ] YES [X] NO'''

====Vote Announcement and Beginning Date of the Discussion Period====
The announcement date of the vote proposal is the beginning date of the seven-day (minimum) posting and Member discussion period. (Certain exceptional vote types have longer discussion periods. Check the Bylaws if you are unsure.) If the Sponsor has chosen to include member input, suggested edits can be made in a shared document or other collaborative vehicle until the language is locked. The sponsor can stop taking suggestions at any time.

====Language Lock Date and Start of Voting====
Five days prior to the Day of the Vote, the vote language is locked, all edits are frozen, and the language of the vote is converted to a pdf file. Ballots that include the pdf are sent to the Membership, and electronic voting begins. Note that the minimum discussion period of seven days leaves only two days for changes before the lock takes place.

====Day of the Vote====
Date the Board has assigned for the vote. The Day of the Vote is the day the vote closes.

Attempt 1:

==Background==
On January 28th, 2025, PS:1 ran a member vote, the [[Club Vote]] establishing a "Club" structure, creating a Committee for Club Oversight (CCO) and introducing new roles including Club Hosts and Club Sponsors. Under this structure, certain individuals were granted free memberships tied to their club leadership roles.

In the year following the vote, concerns have been raised that the Club structure as passed is unnecessarily complex and opaque, and that it creates a pathway for directing organizational resources, including free memberships, to specific individuals in ways that lack the transparency expected of PS:1's normal decision-making processes.

This proposal seeks to repeal the Club Vote in full and move to a simpler model for supporting community-building work at PS:1, one that mirrors the Area Host structure already familiar to the membership, and routes support through existing mechanisms like Work in Lieu of Dues (W.I.L.D.) volunteer positions and short-term scholarships where appropriate.

Members who received free memberships under the Club Vote will be granted one month of continued membership while the Board evaluates whether appropriate W.I.L.D. positions exist for them.

== Wait, isn't there another club vote right now? ==
Yes. There is a competing vote titled [[Club Vote 2026]] being run at the moment, which seeks to amend the club vote language and give out some more free memberships. The sponsors of this vote think the original club vote, and this amendment, are both too opaque and convoluted. Our belief is that the membership and the organization is better served by a volunteer structure consistent with the rest of the volunteer structure at PS:1.

==Synopsis==
This vote repeals the Club Vote from January 28th, 2025, rendering all of its provisions null and void. It grants one month of continued membership to any member currently receiving a free membership under the Club Vote, providing continuity while the Board determines whether W.I.L.D. volunteer positions are appropriate for those individuals.

The sponsor's intent, following a successful repeal is to propose, via Board vote, the creation of a Community Building Area that consolidates the functions currently distributed across the CCO, MMT, and PR. This Area would be governed by an appointed Area Host and evaluated by the same standard applied to all other Area Hosts at PS:1. Budget currently allocated to the CCO would transfer to the new Area.

==Language of the Vote==
The membership of Pumping Station: One, NFP votes to repeal the "Club Vote" from January 28th, 2025, render all portions of it null and void, allow the board to transfer any allocated budget to a newly created Community Building Area, and grant those members granted free memberships under the Club Vote one month of continued membership, while the board determines if there are appropriate Work in Lieu of Dues (W.I.L.D.) volunteer positions for them.

==Footnotes==
This vote was written in 2026 by[[User:jcmertz | Joe 'theJuggler' Mertz]] in collaboration with Claude AI for proofreading and clarity.

[[Category:Votes]]
[[Category:2025 Votes]]

2026 Q2-Q4 Budget Vote

2026-03-11T04:36:58Z

Jcmertz: /* Co-Sponsors */

== 2026 Q2-Q4 Budgets Vote ==

== Sponsor ==
''Name of person submitting the vote (handle + real name)''
* Andrew Locke

== Co-Sponsors ==
''Names of at least two members eligible to vote (handle + real name)''
* Nick Hawley
* [[User:jcmertz | Joe 'theJuggler' Mertz]]
* [[User:Naitotchi | James Lamken]]

== Schedule ==
==== Proposal Date ====
Date this proposal was posted to the membership and a request for a vote date was sent to the Board.

'''[March 10, 2026]'''

==== Member Input ====
Does the Sponsor choose to open the language of the vote for changes due to member input? (optional and can be modified at any time)

'''[X] YES [ ] NO'''

==== Vote Announcement and Beginning Date of the Discussion Period ====
The announcement date of the vote proposal is the beginning date of the seven-day (minimum) posting and Member discussion period. (Certain exceptional vote types have longer discussion periods. Check the Bylaws if you are unsure.)'' If the Sponsor has chosen to include member input, suggested edits can be made in a shared document or other collaborative vehicle until the language is locked. The sponsor can stop taking suggestions at any time. ''

'''[March 10, 2026]'''

==== Language Lock Date and Start of Voting ====
Five days prior to the Day of the Vote, the vote language is locked, all edits are frozen, and the language of the vote is converted to a pdf file. Ballots that include the pdf are sent to the Membership, and electronic voting begins. '' Note that the minimum discussion period of seven days leaves only two days for changes before the lock takes place. ''

'''[DATE]'''

==== Day of the Vote ====

Date the Board has assigned for the vote. The Day of the Vote is the day the vote closes.

'''[DATE]'''

== Background ==
In 2025, $499,573.68 came in (after stripe fees) and $542,934.51 was spent. ($250,000 was a down payment on the building). In 2026, I expect about $570k in revenue. Some of that money has to be spent on things such as rent and electricity and some of it the membership gets to decide how to spend it, but not the amounts reserved for the building and budgetary buffer in the case of unexpected expenses.

PS1 History lesson:

At first, everything was a member vote, even things like "pay the rent"

At some point it was decided this was ridiculous and the board was given the authority to make sure the rent got paid. And other things we can call Operational Expenses. Make sure PS1 continued to exist such that there was a place and the bare necessities. Anything optional required a vote.

Reimburse Patrick for the lamp $153.74 - Passed [Board_Meeting_Notes_2011-05-17]

Which was fine as there wasn't enough money to buy lots of things, and everyone knew that, so there were not very many votes to buy things.

As PS1 grew, there was more money to spend, which meant more votes. Great!

At some point it was decided to consolidate: Each Area Host could run a vote and get a budget for the year. [citation needed]

And later it was decided to consolidate all these votes into one big budget vote, and here we are.

There does not have to be any money allocated for additional votes, and as the organizations financial position changes we will have more or less money to work with.

The budget spreadsheet is to help predict, but not define how money will be spent. Only what is in the language of this vote does.

== Goals ==

1) Spend some money!
== All the numbers: 2026 Budget worksheet ==

'''All budget breakdowns can be found [https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1IIj6tO_ENivaaQUWQSF2BK1DQO1RGuVSNRdqtm2-PA0/edit?usp=sharing here].'''

{| class="wikitable"
|+ 2026 Budget Overview
! Section !! Subsection !! Amount
|-
| Previous Budget || Q1 and Critical Infrastructure [https://wiki.pumpingstationone.org/wiki/2026_Q1_Area_and_Annual_Critical_Infrastructure_Budget_Vote] || $288,370.14
|-
| Revenues || Projected Income || $570,000.00
|-
! colspan="3" | Expenses
|-
| Administrative and Operational || || $16,650
|-
| CTO || || $12,200
|-
| General Operations || || $20,250
|-
| Areas || || $86,418.87
|-
| || ''2D Printing''|| ''$2,360.91''
|-
| || ''3D Printing''|| ''$3,245.15''
|-
| || ''Specialty 3D''|| ''To follow as unique vote once area host is appointed''
|-
| || ''Lasers''|| ''$8,359.64''
|-
| || ''Industrial CNC''|| ''$2,089.94''
|-
| || ''Cold Metals''|| ''$9,150.00''
|-
| || ''Electronics''|| ''$4,490.97''
|-
| || ''Arts''|| ''$6,308.61''
|-
| || ''Hot Metals''|| ''$16,938.65''
|-
| || ''Kitchen''|| ''$5,005.60''
|-
| || ''Small Metals''|| ''$1,225.85''
|-
| || ''Woodshop''|| ''$19,242.56''
|-
| Emergency Repair Fund || || $14,000.00
|-
! Total Expenses !! !! $141,518.87
|-
! Net P/L !! !! $139,810.99
|}

'''Budget total: $141,518.87'''

== Language of the Vote ==

This vote is to authorize the Quarter 2 through Quarter 4 budget for the remainder of the fiscal year of 2026, which expires December 31, 2026.

This vote continues the 2026 Q1 Area and Annual Critical Infrastructure budget [https://wiki.pumpingstationone.org/wiki/2026_Q1_Area_and_Annual_Critical_Infrastructure_Budget_Vote] and all monetary allocations from this vote are additional to the aforementioned vote [https://wiki.pumpingstationone.org/wiki/2026_Q1_Area_and_Annual_Critical_Infrastructure_Budget_Vote]

The following expenditures and allocations are approved by this budget:

'''Areas:'''

Authorize the board to spend up to an additional $2,360.91 to cover 2D Printing expenditures for the duration of the fiscal year of 2026 beyond the previously approved $983.98 in the 2026 Q1 Area and Annual Critical Infrastructure budget [https://wiki.pumpingstationone.org/wiki/2026_Q1_Area_and_Annual_Critical_Infrastructure_Budget_Vote]. The board assigns this spending authority to the area host. This spending authorization goes into effect upon passing of the vote and expires 12-31-2026.

Authorize the board to spend up to an additional $3,245.15 to cover 3D Printing expenditures for the duration of the fiscal year of 2026 beyond the previously approved $7,800.00 in the 2026 Q1 Area and Annual Critical Infrastructure budget [https://wiki.pumpingstationone.org/wiki/2026_Q1_Area_and_Annual_Critical_Infrastructure_Budget_Vote]. The board assigns this spending authority to the area host. This spending authorization goes into effect upon passing of the vote and expires 12-31-2026.

Authorize the board to spend up to an additional $8,359.64 to cover Lasers expenditures for the duration of the fiscal year of 2026 beyond the previously approved $3,000.00 in the 2026 Q1 Area and Annual Critical Infrastructure budget [https://wiki.pumpingstationone.org/wiki/2026_Q1_Area_and_Annual_Critical_Infrastructure_Budget_Vote]. The board assigns this spending authority to the area host. This spending authorization goes into effect upon passing of the vote and expires 12-31-2026.

Authorize the board to spend up to an additional $2,089.94 to cover Industrial CNC expenditures for the duration of the fiscal year of 2026 beyond the previously approved $1,050.00 in the 2026 Q1 Area and Annual Critical Infrastructure budget [https://wiki.pumpingstationone.org/wiki/2026_Q1_Area_and_Annual_Critical_Infrastructure_Budget_Vote]. The board assigns this spending authority to the area host. This spending authorization goes into effect upon passing of the vote and expires 12-31-2026.

Authorize the board to spend up to an additional $9,150.99 to cover Cold Metals expenditures for the duration of the fiscal year of 2026 beyond the previously approved $2,295.00 in the 2026 Q1 Area and Annual Critical Infrastructure budget [https://wiki.pumpingstationone.org/wiki/2026_Q1_Area_and_Annual_Critical_Infrastructure_Budget_Vote]. The board assigns this spending authority to the area host. This spending authorization goes into effect upon passing of the vote and expires 12-31-2026.

Authorize the board to spend up to an additional $4,490.97 to cover Electronics expenditures for the duration of the fiscal year of 2026 beyond the previously approved $500.00 in the 2026 Q1 Area and Annual Critical Infrastructure budget [https://wiki.pumpingstationone.org/wiki/2026_Q1_Area_and_Annual_Critical_Infrastructure_Budget_Vote]. The board assigns this spending authority to the area host. This spending authorization goes into effect upon passing of the vote and expires 12-31-2026.

Authorize the board to spend up to an additional $6,308.61 to cover Arts expenditures for the duration of the fiscal year of 2026 beyond the previously approved $200.00 in the 2026 Q1 Area and Annual Critical Infrastructure budget [https://wiki.pumpingstationone.org/wiki/2026_Q1_Area_and_Annual_Critical_Infrastructure_Budget_Vote]. The board assigns this spending authority to the area host. This spending authorization goes into effect upon passing of the vote and expires 12-31-2026.

Authorize the board to spend up to an additional $16,938.65 to cover Hot Metals expenditures for the duration of the fiscal year of 2026 beyond the previously approved $3,500.00 in the 2026 Q1 Area and Annual Critical Infrastructure budget [https://wiki.pumpingstationone.org/wiki/2026_Q1_Area_and_Annual_Critical_Infrastructure_Budget_Vote]. The board assigns this spending authority to the area host. This spending authorization goes into effect upon passing of the vote and expires 12-31-2026.

Authorize the board to spend up to an additional $5,005.60 to cover Kitchen expenditures for the duration of the fiscal year of 2026 beyond the previously approved $300.00 in the 2026 Q1 Area and Annual Critical Infrastructure budget [https://wiki.pumpingstationone.org/wiki/2026_Q1_Area_and_Annual_Critical_Infrastructure_Budget_Vote]. The board assigns this spending authority to the area host. This spending authorization goes into effect upon passing of the vote and expires 12-31-2026.

Authorize the board to spend up to an additional $1,225.85 to cover Small Metals expenditures for the duration of the fiscal year of 2026 beyond the previously approved $550.00 in the 2026 Q1 Area and Annual Critical Infrastructure budget [https://wiki.pumpingstationone.org/wiki/2026_Q1_Area_and_Annual_Critical_Infrastructure_Budget_Vote]. The board assigns this spending authority to the area host. This spending authorization goes into effect upon passing of the vote and expires 12-31-2026.

Authorize the board to spend up to an additional $19,242.56 to cover Woodshop expenditures for the duration of the fiscal year of 2026 beyond the previously approved $3,000.00 in the 2026 Q1 Area and Annual Critical Infrastructure budget [https://wiki.pumpingstationone.org/wiki/2026_Q1_Area_and_Annual_Critical_Infrastructure_Budget_Vote]. The board assigns this spending authority to the area host. This spending authorization goes into effect upon passing of the vote and expires 12-31-2026.

'''Infrastructure:'''

Authorize the board to spend up to $16,650.00 to cover administrative and operational expenditures for the fiscal year of 2026.

Authorize the board to spend up to an additional $20,250.00 to cover General Operations Team expenditures for the fiscal year of 2026 beyond the previously approved $29,023.00 in the 2026 Q1 Area and Annual Critical Infrastructure budget [https://wiki.pumpingstationone.org/wiki/2026_Q1_Area_and_Annual_Critical_Infrastructure_Budget_Vote]. The board assigns this spending authority to the General Operations Team Lead. This spending authorization goes into effect upon passing of the vote and expires 12-31-2026.

Authorize the board to spend up to an additional $12,200.00 to cover General Operations Team expenditures for the fiscal year of 2026 beyond the previously approved $5,500.00 in the 2026 Q1 Area and Annual Critical Infrastructure budget [https://wiki.pumpingstationone.org/wiki/2026_Q1_Area_and_Annual_Critical_Infrastructure_Budget_Vote]. The board assigns this spending authority to the General Operations Team Lead. This spending authorization goes into effect upon passing of the vote and expires 12-31-2026.

Continue the emergency building reserve of $60,000.00 for expenses that are above and beyond traditional operational expenses; to be contributed to on a monthly basis until the $60,000.00 is reached.

This vote establishes an emergency repair reserve of $14,000.00. The board can disburse all or a portion these reserves in this account by a supermajority vote (at least 75% vote of the Board in favor).

== Results ==
* Date of Vote -
* Quorum:
* For:
* Against:
* Abstain:

[[Category: Votes]]
[[Category: 2026 Votes]]

2026 Q2-Q4 Budget Vote

2026-03-11T04:35:32Z

Jcmertz: /* Co-Sponsors */

== 2026 Q2-Q4 Budgets Vote ==

== Sponsor ==
''Name of person submitting the vote (handle + real name)''
* Andrew Locke

== Co-Sponsors ==
''Names of at least two members eligible to vote (handle + real name)''
* Nick Hawley
* [[User:jcmertz | Joe 'theJuggler' Mertz]]
* James Lamken

== Schedule ==
==== Proposal Date ====
Date this proposal was posted to the membership and a request for a vote date was sent to the Board.

'''[March 10, 2026]'''

==== Member Input ====
Does the Sponsor choose to open the language of the vote for changes due to member input? (optional and can be modified at any time)

'''[X] YES [ ] NO'''

==== Vote Announcement and Beginning Date of the Discussion Period ====
The announcement date of the vote proposal is the beginning date of the seven-day (minimum) posting and Member discussion period. (Certain exceptional vote types have longer discussion periods. Check the Bylaws if you are unsure.)'' If the Sponsor has chosen to include member input, suggested edits can be made in a shared document or other collaborative vehicle until the language is locked. The sponsor can stop taking suggestions at any time. ''

'''[March 10, 2026]'''

==== Language Lock Date and Start of Voting ====
Five days prior to the Day of the Vote, the vote language is locked, all edits are frozen, and the language of the vote is converted to a pdf file. Ballots that include the pdf are sent to the Membership, and electronic voting begins. '' Note that the minimum discussion period of seven days leaves only two days for changes before the lock takes place. ''

'''[DATE]'''

==== Day of the Vote ====

Date the Board has assigned for the vote. The Day of the Vote is the day the vote closes.

'''[DATE]'''

== Background ==
In 2025, $499,573.68 came in (after stripe fees) and $542,934.51 was spent. ($250,000 was a down payment on the building). In 2026, I expect about $570k in revenue. Some of that money has to be spent on things such as rent and electricity and some of it the membership gets to decide how to spend it, but not the amounts reserved for the building and budgetary buffer in the case of unexpected expenses.

PS1 History lesson:

At first, everything was a member vote, even things like "pay the rent"

At some point it was decided this was ridiculous and the board was given the authority to make sure the rent got paid. And other things we can call Operational Expenses. Make sure PS1 continued to exist such that there was a place and the bare necessities. Anything optional required a vote.

Reimburse Patrick for the lamp $153.74 - Passed [Board_Meeting_Notes_2011-05-17]

Which was fine as there wasn't enough money to buy lots of things, and everyone knew that, so there were not very many votes to buy things.

As PS1 grew, there was more money to spend, which meant more votes. Great!

At some point it was decided to consolidate: Each Area Host could run a vote and get a budget for the year. [citation needed]

And later it was decided to consolidate all these votes into one big budget vote, and here we are.

There does not have to be any money allocated for additional votes, and as the organizations financial position changes we will have more or less money to work with.

The budget spreadsheet is to help predict, but not define how money will be spent. Only what is in the language of this vote does.

== Goals ==

1) Spend some money!
== All the numbers: 2026 Budget worksheet ==

'''All budget breakdowns can be found [https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1IIj6tO_ENivaaQUWQSF2BK1DQO1RGuVSNRdqtm2-PA0/edit?usp=sharing here].'''

{| class="wikitable"
|+ 2026 Budget Overview
! Section !! Subsection !! Amount
|-
| Previous Budget || Q1 and Critical Infrastructure [https://wiki.pumpingstationone.org/wiki/2026_Q1_Area_and_Annual_Critical_Infrastructure_Budget_Vote] || $288,370.14
|-
| Revenues || Projected Income || $570,000.00
|-
! colspan="3" | Expenses
|-
| Administrative and Operational || || $16,650
|-
| CTO || || $12,200
|-
| General Operations || || $20,250
|-
| Areas || || $86,418.87
|-
| || ''2D Printing''|| ''$2,360.91''
|-
| || ''3D Printing''|| ''$3,245.15''
|-
| || ''Specialty 3D''|| ''To follow as unique vote once area host is appointed''
|-
| || ''Lasers''|| ''$8,359.64''
|-
| || ''Industrial CNC''|| ''$2,089.94''
|-
| || ''Cold Metals''|| ''$9,150.00''
|-
| || ''Electronics''|| ''$4,490.97''
|-
| || ''Arts''|| ''$6,308.61''
|-
| || ''Hot Metals''|| ''$16,938.65''
|-
| || ''Kitchen''|| ''$5,005.60''
|-
| || ''Small Metals''|| ''$1,225.85''
|-
| || ''Woodshop''|| ''$19,242.56''
|-
| Emergency Repair Fund || || $14,000.00
|-
! Total Expenses !! !! $141,518.87
|-
! Net P/L !! !! $139,810.99
|}

'''Budget total: $141,518.87'''

== Language of the Vote ==

This vote is to authorize the Quarter 2 through Quarter 4 budget for the remainder of the fiscal year of 2026, which expires December 31, 2026.

This vote continues the 2026 Q1 Area and Annual Critical Infrastructure budget [https://wiki.pumpingstationone.org/wiki/2026_Q1_Area_and_Annual_Critical_Infrastructure_Budget_Vote] and all monetary allocations from this vote are additional to the aforementioned vote [https://wiki.pumpingstationone.org/wiki/2026_Q1_Area_and_Annual_Critical_Infrastructure_Budget_Vote]

The following expenditures and allocations are approved by this budget:

'''Areas:'''

Authorize the board to spend up to an additional $2,360.91 to cover 2D Printing expenditures for the duration of the fiscal year of 2026 beyond the previously approved $983.98 in the 2026 Q1 Area and Annual Critical Infrastructure budget [https://wiki.pumpingstationone.org/wiki/2026_Q1_Area_and_Annual_Critical_Infrastructure_Budget_Vote]. The board assigns this spending authority to the area host. This spending authorization goes into effect upon passing of the vote and expires 12-31-2026.

Authorize the board to spend up to an additional $3,245.15 to cover 3D Printing expenditures for the duration of the fiscal year of 2026 beyond the previously approved $7,800.00 in the 2026 Q1 Area and Annual Critical Infrastructure budget [https://wiki.pumpingstationone.org/wiki/2026_Q1_Area_and_Annual_Critical_Infrastructure_Budget_Vote]. The board assigns this spending authority to the area host. This spending authorization goes into effect upon passing of the vote and expires 12-31-2026.

Authorize the board to spend up to an additional $8,359.64 to cover Lasers expenditures for the duration of the fiscal year of 2026 beyond the previously approved $3,000.00 in the 2026 Q1 Area and Annual Critical Infrastructure budget [https://wiki.pumpingstationone.org/wiki/2026_Q1_Area_and_Annual_Critical_Infrastructure_Budget_Vote]. The board assigns this spending authority to the area host. This spending authorization goes into effect upon passing of the vote and expires 12-31-2026.

Authorize the board to spend up to an additional $2,089.94 to cover Industrial CNC expenditures for the duration of the fiscal year of 2026 beyond the previously approved $1,050.00 in the 2026 Q1 Area and Annual Critical Infrastructure budget [https://wiki.pumpingstationone.org/wiki/2026_Q1_Area_and_Annual_Critical_Infrastructure_Budget_Vote]. The board assigns this spending authority to the area host. This spending authorization goes into effect upon passing of the vote and expires 12-31-2026.

Authorize the board to spend up to an additional $9,150.99 to cover Cold Metals expenditures for the duration of the fiscal year of 2026 beyond the previously approved $2,295.00 in the 2026 Q1 Area and Annual Critical Infrastructure budget [https://wiki.pumpingstationone.org/wiki/2026_Q1_Area_and_Annual_Critical_Infrastructure_Budget_Vote]. The board assigns this spending authority to the area host. This spending authorization goes into effect upon passing of the vote and expires 12-31-2026.

Authorize the board to spend up to an additional $4,490.97 to cover Electronics expenditures for the duration of the fiscal year of 2026 beyond the previously approved $500.00 in the 2026 Q1 Area and Annual Critical Infrastructure budget [https://wiki.pumpingstationone.org/wiki/2026_Q1_Area_and_Annual_Critical_Infrastructure_Budget_Vote]. The board assigns this spending authority to the area host. This spending authorization goes into effect upon passing of the vote and expires 12-31-2026.

Authorize the board to spend up to an additional $6,308.61 to cover Arts expenditures for the duration of the fiscal year of 2026 beyond the previously approved $200.00 in the 2026 Q1 Area and Annual Critical Infrastructure budget [https://wiki.pumpingstationone.org/wiki/2026_Q1_Area_and_Annual_Critical_Infrastructure_Budget_Vote]. The board assigns this spending authority to the area host. This spending authorization goes into effect upon passing of the vote and expires 12-31-2026.

Authorize the board to spend up to an additional $16,938.65 to cover Hot Metals expenditures for the duration of the fiscal year of 2026 beyond the previously approved $3,500.00 in the 2026 Q1 Area and Annual Critical Infrastructure budget [https://wiki.pumpingstationone.org/wiki/2026_Q1_Area_and_Annual_Critical_Infrastructure_Budget_Vote]. The board assigns this spending authority to the area host. This spending authorization goes into effect upon passing of the vote and expires 12-31-2026.

Authorize the board to spend up to an additional $5,005.60 to cover Kitchen expenditures for the duration of the fiscal year of 2026 beyond the previously approved $300.00 in the 2026 Q1 Area and Annual Critical Infrastructure budget [https://wiki.pumpingstationone.org/wiki/2026_Q1_Area_and_Annual_Critical_Infrastructure_Budget_Vote]. The board assigns this spending authority to the area host. This spending authorization goes into effect upon passing of the vote and expires 12-31-2026.

Authorize the board to spend up to an additional $1,225.85 to cover Small Metals expenditures for the duration of the fiscal year of 2026 beyond the previously approved $550.00 in the 2026 Q1 Area and Annual Critical Infrastructure budget [https://wiki.pumpingstationone.org/wiki/2026_Q1_Area_and_Annual_Critical_Infrastructure_Budget_Vote]. The board assigns this spending authority to the area host. This spending authorization goes into effect upon passing of the vote and expires 12-31-2026.

Authorize the board to spend up to an additional $19,242.56 to cover Woodshop expenditures for the duration of the fiscal year of 2026 beyond the previously approved $3,000.00 in the 2026 Q1 Area and Annual Critical Infrastructure budget [https://wiki.pumpingstationone.org/wiki/2026_Q1_Area_and_Annual_Critical_Infrastructure_Budget_Vote]. The board assigns this spending authority to the area host. This spending authorization goes into effect upon passing of the vote and expires 12-31-2026.

'''Infrastructure:'''

Authorize the board to spend up to $16,650.00 to cover administrative and operational expenditures for the fiscal year of 2026.

Authorize the board to spend up to an additional $20,250.00 to cover General Operations Team expenditures for the fiscal year of 2026 beyond the previously approved $29,023.00 in the 2026 Q1 Area and Annual Critical Infrastructure budget [https://wiki.pumpingstationone.org/wiki/2026_Q1_Area_and_Annual_Critical_Infrastructure_Budget_Vote]. The board assigns this spending authority to the General Operations Team Lead. This spending authorization goes into effect upon passing of the vote and expires 12-31-2026.

Authorize the board to spend up to an additional $12,200.00 to cover General Operations Team expenditures for the fiscal year of 2026 beyond the previously approved $5,500.00 in the 2026 Q1 Area and Annual Critical Infrastructure budget [https://wiki.pumpingstationone.org/wiki/2026_Q1_Area_and_Annual_Critical_Infrastructure_Budget_Vote]. The board assigns this spending authority to the General Operations Team Lead. This spending authorization goes into effect upon passing of the vote and expires 12-31-2026.

Continue the emergency building reserve of $60,000.00 for expenses that are above and beyond traditional operational expenses; to be contributed to on a monthly basis until the $60,000.00 is reached.

This vote establishes an emergency repair reserve of $14,000.00. The board can disburse all or a portion these reserves in this account by a supermajority vote (at least 75% vote of the Board in favor).

== Results ==
* Date of Vote -
* Quorum:
* For:
* Against:
* Abstain:

[[Category: Votes]]
[[Category: 2026 Votes]]

Scrapbot Smackdown

2026-02-26T05:09:31Z

Jcmertz: /* Event Details */

= Scrapbot Smackdown =
''Part of the [[Doin' the Dale]] Avondale Music and Arts Festival''
'''Thursday, February 26, 2026'''
[[File:Scrapbot Smackdown Logo.png|alt=A logo for the scrapbot smackdown event. Featuring the name in big letters and two robots battling above. |thumb|Logo Courtesy of The Vulture]]
Scrapbot Smackdown is the latest iteration of Pumping Station: One's long-running tradition of wind-up motor crappy robot competitions. Inspired by Japanese Hebocon (“shitty robot”) events, Scrapbot Smackdown celebrates ingenuity, absurdity, and the joyful triumph of questionable engineering.

== Event Details ==

* '''Date:''' Thursday, February 26, 2026
* '''Location:''' Pumping Station: One - Neverland / General Area (3519 N. Elston Ave)
* '''Construction Begins:''' 6:00 PM
* '''Tournament Starts:''' 8:00 PM
* '''Calendar Event:''' [https://calendar.google.com/calendar/u/0/r/eventedit/copy/MXVlZWRwYjFobGFjYWQ0cnNoNDJyN2VrdHUgaGhscDRnY2d2ZG1pZnE1bGNiazdlMjdvbTRAZw Add to Google Calendar]
* '''[https://challonge.com/scrapbot Visit Tournament Bracket] or [https://challonge.com/tournaments/signup/hYczIFq3FS#/signup/fi2g2yclfrw Sign Up Here]'''

Participants will build their scrapbots starting at 6 PM using craft materials and a wind-up toy motor. At 8 PM, the tournament begins.

<div class="noautonum">__TOC__</div>

= Entry & Donations =

Entry is '''pay-what-you-want''' as a donation to Pumping Station: One.

* Suggested donation: '''$10'''
* No one will be turned away for lack of funds.

The goal is accessibility, chaos, and community building. Hopefully we raise some funds along the way.

= What Is a Scrapbot? =

A scrapbot is:

* Powered by a '''wind-up toy motor'''
* Constructed primarily from '''craft materials''' (hot glue, popsicle sticks, cardboard, random detritus, etc.)
* Delightfully imperfect

Advanced robotics, microcontrollers, or precision engineering are strongly discouraged. This is a celebration of charming failure.

Wind-up motors, 3D printed additional gear reductions, hot glue, and misc. craft materials will be provided. Feel free to bring your own <s> craft materials or other junk </s> "serious robot parts" as well.

You can find a rough 3D model of the motors as well as the provided gearing [https://cad.onshape.com/documents/4a1085abf4f80b12140d0d19/w/4f1d7967eba9ee58e93fca64/e/b5c8486f09e1febc0b63ef6e here]:

https://cad.onshape.com/documents/4a1085abf4f80b12140d0d19/w/4f1d7967eba9ee58e93fca64/e/b5c8486f09e1febc0b63ef6e

= Tournament Format =

The tournament will run as a '''double-elimination bracket'''.

Matches are “sumo” style:

* Two scrapbots are wound up and placed into the ring.
* A participant may continue holding the pull spring to maintain tension.
* The official counts down to begin the bout.
* Bots are released simultaneously.

== Bout Structure ==

* A bout ends after '''3 rounds''' OR after '''1 knockout'''.
* If a knockout occurs, the victor immediately advances.

== Knockout Definition ==

A knockout occurs when:

* One bot successfully pushes the opposing bot '''out of the ring'''
* AND the victorious bot '''remains inside the ring'''

The following do '''NOT''' count as knockouts:

* Both bots leave the ring
* Neither bot leaves the ring
* A bot propels itself out of the ring without intervention from the opponent

== Determining Victory (No Knockout) ==

If no knockout occurs after 3 rounds:

* The winner is determined by a '''non-scientific cheering poll'''
* The crowd response is conducted and judged by an event official
* The '''fan favorite advances'''

Enthusiasm matters.

= Spirit of the Event =

Scrapbot Smackdown is:

* Silly
* Low-tech
* Community-driven
* Loud
* Improvised
* Procrastinated

It is a spiritual successor to PS:1’s earlier wind-up robot competitions and part of the broader tradition inspired by Japanese Hebocon events.

Failure is not only acceptable, it is often rewarded. One of the finalists at the first of these events was "Holy Frijoles", a can of baked beans, with a lot of personality, released to roll down a ramp.

= Footnotes =

This event page was originally written by [[User:jcmertz | Joe 'theJuggler' Mertz]] with the assistance of ChatGPT.

Scrapbot Smackdown

2026-02-19T05:51:13Z

Jcmertz: /* What Is a Scrapbot? */

= Scrapbot Smackdown =
''Part of the [[Doin' the Dale]] Avondale Music and Arts Festival''
'''Thursday, February 26, 2026'''
[[File:Scrapbot Smackdown Logo.png|alt=A logo for the scrapbot smackdown event. Featuring the name in big letters and two robots battling above. |thumb|Logo Courtesy of The Vulture]]
Scrapbot Smackdown is the latest iteration of Pumping Station: One's long-running tradition of wind-up motor crappy robot competitions. Inspired by Japanese Hebocon (“shitty robot”) events, Scrapbot Smackdown celebrates ingenuity, absurdity, and the joyful triumph of questionable engineering.

== Event Details ==

* '''Date:''' Thursday, February 26, 2026
* '''Location:''' Pumping Station: One - Neverland / General Area (3519 N. Elston Ave)
* '''Construction Begins:''' 6:00 PM
* '''Tournament Starts:''' 8:00 PM
* '''Calendar Event:''' [https://calendar.google.com/calendar/u/0/r/eventedit/copy/MXVlZWRwYjFobGFjYWQ0cnNoNDJyN2VrdHUgaGhscDRnY2d2ZG1pZnE1bGNiazdlMjdvbTRAZw Add to Google Calendar]

Participants will build their scrapbots starting at 6 PM using craft materials and a wind-up toy motor. At 8 PM, the tournament begins.

<div class="noautonum">__TOC__</div>

= Entry & Donations =

Entry is '''pay-what-you-want''' as a donation to Pumping Station: One.

* Suggested donation: '''$10'''
* No one will be turned away for lack of funds.

The goal is accessibility, chaos, and community building. Hopefully we raise some funds along the way.

= What Is a Scrapbot? =

A scrapbot is:

* Powered by a '''wind-up toy motor'''
* Constructed primarily from '''craft materials''' (hot glue, popsicle sticks, cardboard, random detritus, etc.)
* Delightfully imperfect

Advanced robotics, microcontrollers, or precision engineering are strongly discouraged. This is a celebration of charming failure.

Wind-up motors, 3D printed additional gear reductions, hot glue, and misc. craft materials will be provided. Feel free to bring your own <s> craft materials or other junk </s> "serious robot parts" as well.

You can find a rough 3D model of the motors as well as the provided gearing [https://cad.onshape.com/documents/4a1085abf4f80b12140d0d19/w/4f1d7967eba9ee58e93fca64/e/b5c8486f09e1febc0b63ef6e here]:

https://cad.onshape.com/documents/4a1085abf4f80b12140d0d19/w/4f1d7967eba9ee58e93fca64/e/b5c8486f09e1febc0b63ef6e

= Tournament Format =

The tournament will run as a '''double-elimination bracket'''.

Matches are “sumo” style:

* Two scrapbots are wound up and placed into the ring.
* A participant may continue holding the pull spring to maintain tension.
* The official counts down to begin the bout.
* Bots are released simultaneously.

== Bout Structure ==

* A bout ends after '''3 rounds''' OR after '''1 knockout'''.
* If a knockout occurs, the victor immediately advances.

== Knockout Definition ==

A knockout occurs when:

* One bot successfully pushes the opposing bot '''out of the ring'''
* AND the victorious bot '''remains inside the ring'''

The following do '''NOT''' count as knockouts:

* Both bots leave the ring
* Neither bot leaves the ring
* A bot propels itself out of the ring without intervention from the opponent

== Determining Victory (No Knockout) ==

If no knockout occurs after 3 rounds:

* The winner is determined by a '''non-scientific cheering poll'''
* The crowd response is conducted and judged by an event official
* The '''fan favorite advances'''

Enthusiasm matters.

= Spirit of the Event =

Scrapbot Smackdown is:

* Silly
* Low-tech
* Community-driven
* Loud
* Improvised
* Procrastinated

It is a spiritual successor to PS:1’s earlier wind-up robot competitions and part of the broader tradition inspired by Japanese Hebocon events.

Failure is not only acceptable, it is often rewarded. One of the finalists at the first of these events was "Holy Frijoles", a can of baked beans, with a lot of personality, released to roll down a ramp.

= Footnotes =

This event page was originally written by [[User:jcmertz | Joe 'theJuggler' Mertz]] with the assistance of ChatGPT.

Scrapbot Smackdown

2026-02-19T05:50:37Z

Jcmertz:

= Scrapbot Smackdown =
''Part of the [[Doin' the Dale]] Avondale Music and Arts Festival''
'''Thursday, February 26, 2026'''
[[File:Scrapbot Smackdown Logo.png|alt=A logo for the scrapbot smackdown event. Featuring the name in big letters and two robots battling above. |thumb|Logo Courtesy of The Vulture]]
Scrapbot Smackdown is the latest iteration of Pumping Station: One's long-running tradition of wind-up motor crappy robot competitions. Inspired by Japanese Hebocon (“shitty robot”) events, Scrapbot Smackdown celebrates ingenuity, absurdity, and the joyful triumph of questionable engineering.

== Event Details ==

* '''Date:''' Thursday, February 26, 2026
* '''Location:''' Pumping Station: One - Neverland / General Area (3519 N. Elston Ave)
* '''Construction Begins:''' 6:00 PM
* '''Tournament Starts:''' 8:00 PM
* '''Calendar Event:''' [https://calendar.google.com/calendar/u/0/r/eventedit/copy/MXVlZWRwYjFobGFjYWQ0cnNoNDJyN2VrdHUgaGhscDRnY2d2ZG1pZnE1bGNiazdlMjdvbTRAZw Add to Google Calendar]

Participants will build their scrapbots starting at 6 PM using craft materials and a wind-up toy motor. At 8 PM, the tournament begins.

<div class="noautonum">__TOC__</div>

= Entry & Donations =

Entry is '''pay-what-you-want''' as a donation to Pumping Station: One.

* Suggested donation: '''$10'''
* No one will be turned away for lack of funds.

The goal is accessibility, chaos, and community building. Hopefully we raise some funds along the way.

= What Is a Scrapbot? =

A scrapbot is:

* Powered by a '''wind-up toy motor'''
* Constructed primarily from '''craft materials''' (hot glue, popsicle sticks, cardboard, random detritus, etc.)
* Delightfully imperfect

Advanced robotics, microcontrollers, or precision engineering are strongly discouraged. This is a celebration of charming failure.

Wind-up motors, 3D printed additional gear reductions, hot glue, and misc. craft materials will be provided. Feel free to bring your own <s> craft materials or other junk </s> "serious robot parts" as well.

You can find a rough 3D model of the motors as well as the provided gearing here: https://cad.onshape.com/documents/4a1085abf4f80b12140d0d19/w/4f1d7967eba9ee58e93fca64/e/b5c8486f09e1febc0b63ef6e

= Tournament Format =

The tournament will run as a '''double-elimination bracket'''.

Matches are “sumo” style:

* Two scrapbots are wound up and placed into the ring.
* A participant may continue holding the pull spring to maintain tension.
* The official counts down to begin the bout.
* Bots are released simultaneously.

== Bout Structure ==

* A bout ends after '''3 rounds''' OR after '''1 knockout'''.
* If a knockout occurs, the victor immediately advances.

== Knockout Definition ==

A knockout occurs when:

* One bot successfully pushes the opposing bot '''out of the ring'''
* AND the victorious bot '''remains inside the ring'''

The following do '''NOT''' count as knockouts:

* Both bots leave the ring
* Neither bot leaves the ring
* A bot propels itself out of the ring without intervention from the opponent

== Determining Victory (No Knockout) ==

If no knockout occurs after 3 rounds:

* The winner is determined by a '''non-scientific cheering poll'''
* The crowd response is conducted and judged by an event official
* The '''fan favorite advances'''

Enthusiasm matters.

= Spirit of the Event =

Scrapbot Smackdown is:

* Silly
* Low-tech
* Community-driven
* Loud
* Improvised
* Procrastinated

It is a spiritual successor to PS:1’s earlier wind-up robot competitions and part of the broader tradition inspired by Japanese Hebocon events.

Failure is not only acceptable, it is often rewarded. One of the finalists at the first of these events was "Holy Frijoles", a can of baked beans, with a lot of personality, released to roll down a ramp.

= Footnotes =

This event page was originally written by [[User:jcmertz | Joe 'theJuggler' Mertz]] with the assistance of ChatGPT.

Scrapbot Smackdown

2026-02-19T05:47:29Z

Jcmertz: /* Scrapbot Smackdown */

= Scrapbot Smackdown =
''Part of the [[Doin' the Dale]] Avondale Music and Arts Festival''
'''Thursday, February 26, 2026'''
[[File:Scrapbot Smackdown Logo.png|alt=A logo for the scrapbot smackdown event. Featuring the name in big letters and two robots battling above. |thumb|Logo Courtesy of The Vulture]]
Scrapbot Smackdown is the latest iteration of Pumping Station: One's long-running tradition of wind-up motor crappy robot competitions. Inspired by Japanese Hebocon (“shitty robot”) events, Scrapbot Smackdown celebrates ingenuity, absurdity, and the joyful triumph of questionable engineering.

== Event Details ==

* '''Date:''' Thursday, February 26, 2026
* '''Location:''' Pumping Station: One - Neverland / General Area (3519 N. Elston Ave)
* '''Construction Begins:''' 6:00 PM
* '''Tournament Starts:''' 8:00 PM
* '''Calendar Event:''' [https://calendar.google.com/calendar/u/0/r/eventedit/copy/MXVlZWRwYjFobGFjYWQ0cnNoNDJyN2VrdHUgaGhscDRnY2d2ZG1pZnE1bGNiazdlMjdvbTRAZw Add to Google Calendar]

Participants will build their scrapbots starting at 6 PM using craft materials and a wind-up toy motor. At 8 PM, the tournament begins.

<div class="noautonum">__TOC__</div>

= Entry & Donations =

Entry is '''pay-what-you-want''' as a donation to Pumping Station: One.

* Suggested donation: '''$10'''
* No one will be turned away for lack of funds.

The goal is accessibility, chaos, and community building. Hopefully we raise some funds along the way.

= What Is a Scrapbot? =

A scrapbot is:

* Powered by a '''wind-up toy motor'''
* Constructed primarily from '''craft materials''' (hot glue, popsicle sticks, cardboard, random detritus, etc.)
* Delightfully imperfect

Advanced robotics, microcontrollers, or precision engineering are strongly discouraged. This is a celebration of charming failure.

Wind-up motors, 3D printed additional gear reductions, hot glue, and misc. craft materials will be provided. Feel free to bring your own <s> craft materials or other junk </s> "serious robot parts" as well.

= Tournament Format =

The tournament will run as a '''double-elimination bracket'''.

Matches are “sumo” style:

* Two scrapbots are wound up and placed into the ring.
* A participant may continue holding the pull spring to maintain tension.
* The official counts down to begin the bout.
* Bots are released simultaneously.

== Bout Structure ==

* A bout ends after '''3 rounds''' OR after '''1 knockout'''.
* If a knockout occurs, the victor immediately advances.

== Knockout Definition ==

A knockout occurs when:

* One bot successfully pushes the opposing bot '''out of the ring'''
* AND the victorious bot '''remains inside the ring'''

The following do '''NOT''' count as knockouts:

* Both bots leave the ring
* Neither bot leaves the ring
* A bot propels itself out of the ring without intervention from the opponent

== Determining Victory (No Knockout) ==

If no knockout occurs after 3 rounds:

* The winner is determined by a '''non-scientific cheering poll'''
* The crowd response is conducted and judged by an event official
* The '''fan favorite advances'''

Enthusiasm matters.

= Spirit of the Event =

Scrapbot Smackdown is:

* Silly
* Low-tech
* Community-driven
* Loud
* Improvised
* Procrastinated

It is a spiritual successor to PS:1’s earlier wind-up robot competitions and part of the broader tradition inspired by Japanese Hebocon events.

Failure is not only acceptable, it is often rewarded. One of the finalists at the first of these events was "Holy Frijoles", a can of baked beans, with a lot of personality, released to roll down a ramp.

= Footnotes =

This event page was originally written by [[User:jcmertz | Joe 'theJuggler' Mertz]] with the assistance of ChatGPT.

Scrapbot Smackdown

2026-02-19T05:45:37Z

Jcmertz: Added logo

= Scrapbot Smackdown =
''Part of the [[Doin' the Dale]] Avondale Music and Arts Festival''
'''Thursday, February 26, 2026'''
[[File:Scrapbot Smackdown Logo.png|alt=A logo for the scrapbot smackdown event. Featuring the name in big letters and two robots battling above. |thumb]]
Scrapbot Smackdown is the latest iteration of Pumping Station: One's long-running tradition of wind-up motor crappy robot competitions. Inspired by Japanese Hebocon (“shitty robot”) events, Scrapbot Smackdown celebrates ingenuity, absurdity, and the joyful triumph of questionable engineering.

== Event Details ==

* '''Date:''' Thursday, February 26, 2026
* '''Location:''' Pumping Station: One - Neverland / General Area (3519 N. Elston Ave)
* '''Construction Begins:''' 6:00 PM
* '''Tournament Starts:''' 8:00 PM
* '''Calendar Event:''' [https://calendar.google.com/calendar/u/0/r/eventedit/copy/MXVlZWRwYjFobGFjYWQ0cnNoNDJyN2VrdHUgaGhscDRnY2d2ZG1pZnE1bGNiazdlMjdvbTRAZw Add to Google Calendar]

Participants will build their scrapbots starting at 6 PM using craft materials and a wind-up toy motor. At 8 PM, the tournament begins.

<div class="noautonum">__TOC__</div>

= Entry & Donations =

Entry is '''pay-what-you-want''' as a donation to Pumping Station: One.

* Suggested donation: '''$10'''
* No one will be turned away for lack of funds.

The goal is accessibility, chaos, and community building. Hopefully we raise some funds along the way.

= What Is a Scrapbot? =

A scrapbot is:

* Powered by a '''wind-up toy motor'''
* Constructed primarily from '''craft materials''' (hot glue, popsicle sticks, cardboard, random detritus, etc.)
* Delightfully imperfect

Advanced robotics, microcontrollers, or precision engineering are strongly discouraged. This is a celebration of charming failure.

Wind-up motors, 3D printed additional gear reductions, hot glue, and misc. craft materials will be provided. Feel free to bring your own <s> craft materials or other junk </s> "serious robot parts" as well.

= Tournament Format =

The tournament will run as a '''double-elimination bracket'''.

Matches are “sumo” style:

* Two scrapbots are wound up and placed into the ring.
* A participant may continue holding the pull spring to maintain tension.
* The official counts down to begin the bout.
* Bots are released simultaneously.

== Bout Structure ==

* A bout ends after '''3 rounds''' OR after '''1 knockout'''.
* If a knockout occurs, the victor immediately advances.

== Knockout Definition ==

A knockout occurs when:

* One bot successfully pushes the opposing bot '''out of the ring'''
* AND the victorious bot '''remains inside the ring'''

The following do '''NOT''' count as knockouts:

* Both bots leave the ring
* Neither bot leaves the ring
* A bot propels itself out of the ring without intervention from the opponent

== Determining Victory (No Knockout) ==

If no knockout occurs after 3 rounds:

* The winner is determined by a '''non-scientific cheering poll'''
* The crowd response is conducted and judged by an event official
* The '''fan favorite advances'''

Enthusiasm matters.

= Spirit of the Event =

Scrapbot Smackdown is:

* Silly
* Low-tech
* Community-driven
* Loud
* Improvised
* Procrastinated

It is a spiritual successor to PS:1’s earlier wind-up robot competitions and part of the broader tradition inspired by Japanese Hebocon events.

Failure is not only acceptable, it is often rewarded. One of the finalists at the first of these events was "Holy Frijoles", a can of baked beans, with a lot of personality, released to roll down a ramp.

= Footnotes =

This event page was originally written by [[User:jcmertz | Joe 'theJuggler' Mertz]] with the assistance of ChatGPT.

File:Scrapbot Smackdown Logo.png

2026-02-19T05:44:42Z

Jcmertz:

A logo for the scrapbot smackdown event. Featuring the name in big letters and two robots battling above.

Scrapbot Smackdown

2026-02-19T05:43:51Z

Jcmertz: /* Scrapbot Smackdown */

= Scrapbot Smackdown =
''Part of the [[Doin' the Dale]] Avondale Music and Arts Festival''
'''Thursday, February 26, 2026'''

Scrapbot Smackdown is the latest iteration of Pumping Station: One's long-running tradition of wind-up motor crappy robot competitions. Inspired by Japanese Hebocon (“shitty robot”) events, Scrapbot Smackdown celebrates ingenuity, absurdity, and the joyful triumph of questionable engineering.

== Event Details ==

* '''Date:''' Thursday, February 26, 2026
* '''Location:''' Pumping Station: One - Neverland / General Area (3519 N. Elston Ave)
* '''Construction Begins:''' 6:00 PM
* '''Tournament Starts:''' 8:00 PM
* '''Calendar Event:''' [https://calendar.google.com/calendar/u/0/r/eventedit/copy/MXVlZWRwYjFobGFjYWQ0cnNoNDJyN2VrdHUgaGhscDRnY2d2ZG1pZnE1bGNiazdlMjdvbTRAZw Add to Google Calendar]

Participants will build their scrapbots starting at 6 PM using craft materials and a wind-up toy motor. At 8 PM, the tournament begins.

<div class="noautonum">__TOC__</div>

= Entry & Donations =

Entry is '''pay-what-you-want''' as a donation to Pumping Station: One.

* Suggested donation: '''$10'''
* No one will be turned away for lack of funds.

The goal is accessibility, chaos, and community building. Hopefully we raise some funds along the way.

= What Is a Scrapbot? =

A scrapbot is:

* Powered by a '''wind-up toy motor'''
* Constructed primarily from '''craft materials''' (hot glue, popsicle sticks, cardboard, random detritus, etc.)
* Delightfully imperfect

Advanced robotics, microcontrollers, or precision engineering are strongly discouraged. This is a celebration of charming failure.

Wind-up motors, 3D printed additional gear reductions, hot glue, and misc. craft materials will be provided. Feel free to bring your own <s> craft materials or other junk </s> "serious robot parts" as well.

= Tournament Format =

The tournament will run as a '''double-elimination bracket'''.

Matches are “sumo” style:

* Two scrapbots are wound up and placed into the ring.
* A participant may continue holding the pull spring to maintain tension.
* The official counts down to begin the bout.
* Bots are released simultaneously.

== Bout Structure ==

* A bout ends after '''3 rounds''' OR after '''1 knockout'''.
* If a knockout occurs, the victor immediately advances.

== Knockout Definition ==

A knockout occurs when:

* One bot successfully pushes the opposing bot '''out of the ring'''
* AND the victorious bot '''remains inside the ring'''

The following do '''NOT''' count as knockouts:

* Both bots leave the ring
* Neither bot leaves the ring
* A bot propels itself out of the ring without intervention from the opponent

== Determining Victory (No Knockout) ==

If no knockout occurs after 3 rounds:

* The winner is determined by a '''non-scientific cheering poll'''
* The crowd response is conducted and judged by an event official
* The '''fan favorite advances'''

Enthusiasm matters.

= Spirit of the Event =

Scrapbot Smackdown is:

* Silly
* Low-tech
* Community-driven
* Loud
* Improvised
* Procrastinated

It is a spiritual successor to PS:1’s earlier wind-up robot competitions and part of the broader tradition inspired by Japanese Hebocon events.

Failure is not only acceptable, it is often rewarded. One of the finalists at the first of these events was "Holy Frijoles", a can of baked beans, with a lot of personality, released to roll down a ramp.

= Footnotes =

This event page was originally written by [[User:jcmertz | Joe 'theJuggler' Mertz]] with the assistance of ChatGPT.

Scrapbot Smackdown

2026-02-19T05:43:01Z

Jcmertz:

= Scrapbot Smackdown =
''Part of [[Doin' the Dale]]''
'''Thursday, February 26, 2026'''

Scrapbot Smackdown is the latest iteration of Pumping Station: One's long-running tradition of wind-up motor crappy robot competitions. Inspired by Japanese Hebocon (“shitty robot”) events, Scrapbot Smackdown celebrates ingenuity, absurdity, and the joyful triumph of questionable engineering.

== Event Details ==

* '''Date:''' Thursday, February 26, 2026
* '''Location:''' Pumping Station: One - Neverland / General Area (3519 N. Elston Ave)
* '''Construction Begins:''' 6:00 PM
* '''Tournament Starts:''' 8:00 PM
* '''Calendar Event:''' [https://calendar.google.com/calendar/u/0/r/eventedit/copy/MXVlZWRwYjFobGFjYWQ0cnNoNDJyN2VrdHUgaGhscDRnY2d2ZG1pZnE1bGNiazdlMjdvbTRAZw Add to Google Calendar]

Participants will build their scrapbots starting at 6 PM using craft materials and a wind-up toy motor. At 8 PM, the tournament begins.

<div class="noautonum">__TOC__</div>

= Entry & Donations =

Entry is '''pay-what-you-want''' as a donation to Pumping Station: One.

* Suggested donation: '''$10'''
* No one will be turned away for lack of funds.

The goal is accessibility, chaos, and community building. Hopefully we raise some funds along the way.

= What Is a Scrapbot? =

A scrapbot is:

* Powered by a '''wind-up toy motor'''
* Constructed primarily from '''craft materials''' (hot glue, popsicle sticks, cardboard, random detritus, etc.)
* Delightfully imperfect

Advanced robotics, microcontrollers, or precision engineering are strongly discouraged. This is a celebration of charming failure.

Wind-up motors, 3D printed additional gear reductions, hot glue, and misc. craft materials will be provided. Feel free to bring your own <s> craft materials or other junk </s> "serious robot parts" as well.

= Tournament Format =

The tournament will run as a '''double-elimination bracket'''.

Matches are “sumo” style:

* Two scrapbots are wound up and placed into the ring.
* A participant may continue holding the pull spring to maintain tension.
* The official counts down to begin the bout.
* Bots are released simultaneously.

== Bout Structure ==

* A bout ends after '''3 rounds''' OR after '''1 knockout'''.
* If a knockout occurs, the victor immediately advances.

== Knockout Definition ==

A knockout occurs when:

* One bot successfully pushes the opposing bot '''out of the ring'''
* AND the victorious bot '''remains inside the ring'''

The following do '''NOT''' count as knockouts:

* Both bots leave the ring
* Neither bot leaves the ring
* A bot propels itself out of the ring without intervention from the opponent

== Determining Victory (No Knockout) ==

If no knockout occurs after 3 rounds:

* The winner is determined by a '''non-scientific cheering poll'''
* The crowd response is conducted and judged by an event official
* The '''fan favorite advances'''

Enthusiasm matters.

= Spirit of the Event =

Scrapbot Smackdown is:

* Silly
* Low-tech
* Community-driven
* Loud
* Improvised
* Procrastinated

It is a spiritual successor to PS:1’s earlier wind-up robot competitions and part of the broader tradition inspired by Japanese Hebocon events.

Failure is not only acceptable, it is often rewarded. One of the finalists at the first of these events was "Holy Frijoles", a can of baked beans, with a lot of personality, released to roll down a ramp.

= Footnotes =

This event page was originally written by [[User:jcmertz | Joe 'theJuggler' Mertz]] with the assistance of ChatGPT.

Scrapbot Smackdown

2026-02-19T05:42:07Z

Jcmertz:

= Scrapbot Smackdown =
''Part of [[Doin' the Dale]]''
'''Thursday, February 26, 2026'''

Scrapbot Smackdown is the latest iteration of Pumping Station: One's long-running tradition of wind-up motor crappy robot competitions. Inspired by Japanese Hebocon (“shitty robot”) events, Scrapbot Smackdown celebrates ingenuity, absurdity, and the joyful triumph of questionable engineering.

== Event Details ==

* '''Date:''' Thursday, February 26, 2026
* '''Location:''' Pumping Station: One - Neverland / General Area (3519 N. Elston Ave)
* '''Construction Begins:''' 6:00 PM
* '''Tournament Starts:''' 8:00 PM
* '''Calendar Event:''' [https://calendar.google.com/calendar/u/0/r/eventedit/copy/MXVlZWRwYjFobGFjYWQ0cnNoNDJyN2VrdHUgaGhscDRnY2d2ZG1pZnE1bGNiazdlMjdvbTRAZw Add to Google Calendar]

Participants will build their scrapbots starting at 6 PM using craft materials and a wind-up toy motor. At 8 PM, the tournament begins.

<div class="noautonum">__TOC__</div>

== Entry & Donations ==

Entry is '''pay-what-you-want''' as a donation to Pumping Station: One.

* Suggested donation: '''$10'''
* No one will be turned away for lack of funds.

The goal is accessibility, chaos, and community building. Hopefully we raise some funds along the way.

== What Is a Scrapbot? ==

A scrapbot is:

* Powered by a '''wind-up toy motor'''
* Constructed primarily from '''craft materials''' (hot glue, popsicle sticks, cardboard, random detritus, etc.)
* Delightfully imperfect

Advanced robotics, microcontrollers, or precision engineering are strongly discouraged. This is a celebration of charming failure.

Wind-up motors, 3D printed additional gear reductions, hot glue, and misc. craft materials will be provided. Feel free to bring your own <s> craft materials or other junk </s> "serious robot parts" as well.

== Tournament Format ==

The tournament will run as a '''double-elimination bracket'''.

Matches are “sumo” style:

* Two scrapbots are wound up and placed into the ring.
* A participant may continue holding the pull spring to maintain tension.
* The official counts down to begin the bout.
* Bots are released simultaneously.

=== Bout Structure ===

* A bout ends after '''3 rounds''' OR after '''1 knockout'''.
* If a knockout occurs, the victor immediately advances.

=== Knockout Definition ===

A knockout occurs when:

* One bot successfully pushes the opposing bot '''out of the ring'''
* AND the victorious bot '''remains inside the ring'''

The following do '''NOT''' count as knockouts:

* Both bots leave the ring
* Neither bot leaves the ring
* A bot propels itself out of the ring without intervention from the opponent

=== Determining Victory (No Knockout) ===

If no knockout occurs after 3 rounds:

* The winner is determined by a '''non-scientific cheering poll'''
* The crowd response is conducted and judged by an event official
* The '''fan favorite advances'''

Enthusiasm matters.

== Spirit of the Event ==

Scrapbot Smackdown is:

* Silly
* Low-tech
* Community-driven
* Loud
* Improvised
* Procrastinated

It is a spiritual successor to PS:1’s earlier wind-up robot competitions and part of the broader tradition inspired by Japanese Hebocon events.

Failure is not only acceptable, it is often rewarded. One of the finalists at the first of these events was "Holy Frijoles", a can of baked beans, with a lot of personality, released to roll down a ramp.

== Footnotes ==

This event page was originally written by [[User:jcmertz | Joe 'theJuggler' Mertz]] with the assistance of ChatGPT.

Scrapbot Smackdown

2026-02-19T05:41:31Z

Jcmertz:

= Scrapbot Smackdown =
''Part of [[Doin' the Dale]]''
'''Thursday, February 26, 2026'''

Scrapbot Smackdown is the latest iteration of Pumping Station: One's long-running tradition of wind-up motor crappy robot competitions. Inspired by Japanese Hebocon (“shitty robot”) events, Scrapbot Smackdown celebrates ingenuity, absurdity, and the joyful triumph of questionable engineering.

== Event Details ==

* '''Date:''' Thursday, February 26, 2026
* '''Location:''' Pumping Station: One - Neverland / General Area (3519 N. Elston Ave)
* '''Construction Begins:''' 6:00 PM
* '''Tournament Starts:''' 8:00 PM
* '''Calendar Event:''' [https://calendar.google.com/calendar/u/0/r/eventedit/copy/MXVlZWRwYjFobGFjYWQ0cnNoNDJyN2VrdHUgaGhscDRnY2d2ZG1pZnE1bGNiazdlMjdvbTRAZw Add to Google Calendar]

Participants will build their scrapbots starting at 6 PM using craft materials and a wind-up toy motor. At 8 PM, the tournament begins.

== Entry & Donations ==

Entry is '''pay-what-you-want''' as a donation to Pumping Station: One.

* Suggested donation: '''$10'''
* No one will be turned away for lack of funds.

The goal is accessibility, chaos, and community building. Hopefully we raise some funds along the way.

== What Is a Scrapbot? ==

A scrapbot is:

* Powered by a '''wind-up toy motor'''
* Constructed primarily from '''craft materials''' (hot glue, popsicle sticks, cardboard, random detritus, etc.)
* Delightfully imperfect

Advanced robotics, microcontrollers, or precision engineering are strongly discouraged. This is a celebration of charming failure.

Wind-up motors, 3D printed additional gear reductions, hot glue, and misc. craft materials will be provided. Feel free to bring your own <s> craft materials or other junk </s> "serious robot parts" as well.

== Tournament Format ==

The tournament will run as a '''double-elimination bracket'''.

Matches are “sumo” style:

* Two scrapbots are wound up and placed into the ring.
* A participant may continue holding the pull spring to maintain tension.
* The official counts down to begin the bout.
* Bots are released simultaneously.

=== Bout Structure ===

* A bout ends after '''3 rounds''' OR after '''1 knockout'''.
* If a knockout occurs, the victor immediately advances.

=== Knockout Definition ===

A knockout occurs when:

* One bot successfully pushes the opposing bot '''out of the ring'''
* AND the victorious bot '''remains inside the ring'''

The following do '''NOT''' count as knockouts:

* Both bots leave the ring
* Neither bot leaves the ring
* A bot propels itself out of the ring without intervention from the opponent

=== Determining Victory (No Knockout) ===

If no knockout occurs after 3 rounds:

* The winner is determined by a '''non-scientific cheering poll'''
* The crowd response is conducted and judged by an event official
* The '''fan favorite advances'''

Enthusiasm matters.

== Spirit of the Event ==

Scrapbot Smackdown is:

* Silly
* Low-tech
* Community-driven
* Loud
* Improvised
* Procrastinated

It is a spiritual successor to PS:1’s earlier wind-up robot competitions and part of the broader tradition inspired by Japanese Hebocon events.

Failure is not only acceptable, it is often rewarded. One of the finalists at the first of these events was "Holy Frijoles", a can of baked beans, with a lot of personality, released to roll down a ramp.

== Footnotes ==

This event page was originally written by [[User:jcmertz | Joe 'theJuggler' Mertz]] with the assistance of ChatGPT.

Doin' the Dale

2026-02-19T05:01:00Z

Jcmertz:

Are you [https://dointhedale.com/ doin' the Dale]? [[Scrapbot Smackdown|PS:1 Is!]]

Scrapbot Smackdown

2026-02-19T04:59:48Z

Jcmertz: Created page with "Watch this page!"

Watch this page!

Doin' the Dale

2026-02-19T04:59:03Z

Jcmertz: Created page with "Are you [https://dointhedale.com/ doin' the Dale]? PS:1 Is!"

Are you [https://dointhedale.com/ doin' the Dale]? PS:1 Is!

Scholarship Policy 2026

2026-02-16T06:47:16Z

Jcmertz: added a contextual note to the contextual note around how the formula works

{{Note|type=warn|text=''This page became official policy as a result of the "[[Scholarship Policy Update Vote 2025]]" vote.''}}

== Overview ==
The PS:1 Scholarship Policy is intended to reduce financial barriers to membership, support a diverse and active community of makers and hackers, and align scholarship awards with the space’s purpose and values. Scholarships are time-limited memberships awarded through a recurring application and review process.

<div class="noautonum">__TOC__</div>

== 1. Scholarship Term ==
# Scholarships are awarded for a '''six-month term'''.
# Scholarship members have the same access and responsibilities as regular members during their term, unless otherwise noted in other policies.
# Scholarship recipients are subject to all clauses of the Membership Agreement and all other PS:1 policies. They may receive temporary or permanent bans for violations, the same as any other member.
# Scholarship terms begin on the first day of the month following selection.

== 2. Monthly Application and Selection Process ==
# PS:1 uses a '''monthly scholarship cycle''' rather than limited selection windows during the year.
# The scholarship application remains open year-round, with a clearly posted monthly deadline for each selection cycle.
# Applicants who are not selected in a given month '''must reapply''' to be considered again in future months.
# Continued interest—shown by reapplying, updating responses, and staying engaged—is included as a factor in the selection rubric.
# Applications are reviewed by the Scholarship Commission (or another group designated by the Board) using the rubric in this policy.

== 3. Number of Scholarships Awarded Each Month ==
# The number of scholarships that '''begin in a specific month''' scales with the current membership count.
# The default formula is:

: '''0.5% of current dues-paying membership, rounded to the nearest whole number, with a minimum of 1 scholarship per month.'''
{{Note|type=warn|text=''This Note is not part of the policy, but added to provide context. Editors Note: The intention of this formula was that it would be calculated from a base number including all current members, including Work in Lieu of Dues volunteers. This was agreed upon by the board at the first scholarship designation on February 3rd. When this policy is next updated, it is suggested that this section be updated for clarity.''}}

# Membership count for this purpose is determined as of the first day of the month in which the scholarship term begins.
# The Board may adjust the ratio by Board vote if membership levels or financial conditions change significantly. Any such change must be announced through PS:1’s official communication channels.

== 4. Scholarship Extension ==
# Scholarship recipients may request a '''six-month extension''' during the final month of their scholarship term.
# To request an extension, the recipient must attend a Board meeting and give a short presentation that covers:
## What they’ve accomplished during their first five months at PS:1;
## How the scholarship has supported their work and participation in the community;
## Their goals and plans for the next six months if the scholarship is extended.
# After the presentation, the Board will vote to approve or deny the extension.
# Each scholarship can be extended once under this policy, unless changed by a future member vote.

== 5. Administration ==
# The Scholarship Commission (or another group designated by the Board) is responsible for:
## Maintaining and publishing the scholarship application,
## Reviewing and scoring applications using the rubric in this policy,
## Recommending finalists for each monthly cycle,
## Tracking scholarship start and end dates in the membership system,
## Coordinating with the Board on extension requests and approvals.
# The Scholarship Commission may adopt additional internal processes and guidelines to carry out this policy, as long as they do not conflict with the language of this policy or other PS:1 policies.
# The Scholarship Commission may modify the scholarship application questions and scoring rubric at any time, provided that:
## Any changes are announced via PS:1’s official communication channels (for example, mailing list, forums, and/or Discord as appropriate), and
## This policy page is updated to reflect the current application and rubric.

== 6. Scholarship Application Questions ==
Applicants must answer all required questions honestly and to the best of their ability. The current standard application includes:

=== Why would you like to be considered for a scholarship? ===
''Please write 1–3 paragraphs.''

Tell us what brings you to PS:1 at this point in your life. What opportunities would a scholarship unlock for you? How would it support your goals, interests, or growth?

=== What would you like to make or hack at PS:1? ===
''Please write 1–3 paragraphs.''

You do not need to have a fully formed project. Curiosity and exploration are welcome. Tell us what tools, skills, or ideas excite you and what you hope to learn or create at the space.

=== In your own words, what is the purpose of PS:1? ===
''Please write 1–3 paragraphs.''

There are no right or wrong answers. We want to understand your perspective. What do you think a community workshop/makerspace is for? How do you imagine participating in and contributing to PS:1?

=== Financial Need (multiple choice) ===
''This field has lower weight than the essays but is still considered.''

Which of the following best describes your financial situation in relation to PS:1 membership?

* '''I would not be able to be a member of PS:1 without a scholarship.'''
* '''It would be hard for me to be a member without a scholarship.'''
* '''I can barely afford PS:1, but I could technically make it work.'''
* '''My scholarship request is not need-based.'''
* '''I prefer not to answer.'''

=== Minority Status in the PS:1 Community (optional) ===
Do you self-identify as a minority in the PS:1 community? Examples include BIPOC individuals and people who identify as women or nonbinary, but you may answer based on your own lived experience.

* '''Yes'''
* '''No'''
* '''Prefer not to answer'''

== 7. Scoring Rubric ==
The Scholarship Commission uses the following rubric as a guideline for scoring. Multiple reviewers are encouraged, and scores may be averaged.

=== Essay: Why would you like to be considered for a scholarship? (0–10 points) ===
* '''0–2 points''': Vague or incomplete; no clear personal motivation.
* '''3–5 points''': Some motivation described; limited connection to growth or barriers.
* '''6–8 points''': Clear, thoughtful reasoning; demonstrates how PS:1 would meaningfully benefit the applicant.
* '''9–10 points''': Exceptionally compelling; strong personal narrative, clear barriers, and high potential impact.

=== Essay: What would you like to make or hack at PS:1? (0–10 points) ===
* '''0–2 points''': Minimal information; unclear what the applicant wants to do.
* '''3–5 points''': Some ideas but shallow detail; shows curiosity but not depth.
* '''6–8 points''': Clear goals; shows enthusiasm for making/learning; aligns with PS:1 tools and activities.
* '''9–10 points''': Highly creative, well thought-out goals; strong alignment with PS:1’s culture of experimentation.

=== Essay: In your own words, what is the purpose of a hackerspace/makerspace? (0–10 points) ===
* '''0–2 points''': Little understanding of hackerspace or community workshop ideas; generic or inaccurate answer.
* '''3–5 points''': Basic understanding of a makerspace/community workshop.
* '''6–8 points''': Good insight into the purpose and values of a hackerspace; shows a desire to participate and contribute.
* '''9–10 points''': Deep, thoughtful understanding; expresses values of collaboration, experimentation, and community.

=== Financial Need (0–5 points, low weight) ===
* '''I would not be able to be a member without a scholarship.''' – +5 points
* '''It would be hard for me to be a member without a scholarship.''' – +4 points
* '''I can barely afford PS:1, but I could technically make it work.''' – +2 points
* '''My scholarship request is not need-based.''' – –2 points (mild negative weight; not disqualifying)
* '''I prefer not to answer.''' – 0 points (neutral)

=== Minority Status in the PS:1 Community (0–2 points, very low weight) ===
* '''Yes''' – +2 points
* '''No''' – 0 points
* '''Prefer not to answer''' – 0 points
This factor does not decide selection by itself, but is included to modestly prioritize applicants from underrepresented groups in the community.

=== Repeated Applications (0–5 points, low weight) ===
* +1 Point for every past rejected application, up to 5 points total. An accepted application resets this counter.

=== Past Scholarships (0 - -5 points, low weight) ===
* -1 Point for every past awarded scholarship, up to -5 points total.

== 8. Total Scoring and Selection ==
# A typical total score range is approximately 0–37 points using the rubric above.
# The Scholarship Commission may normalize or average scores across reviewers to account for different scoring styles.
# Final approval of scholarship awards for each month rests with the Board, based on the recommendations of the Scholarship Commission.

== 9. Modification of Application Process ==

The Scholarship Commission may modify the scholarship application questions and scoring rubric at any time, provided that:
* 1. Any changes are announced via PS:1’s official communication channels.
* 2. The Scholarship Policy 2026 page is updated to reflect the current application and rubric.

== 10. Short Term Scholarships ==

In addition to the standard six month scholarship terms, the board may choose to offer 1 month memberships as "bounties" to encourage volunteers to take on short term projects that don't make sense as standard Work in Lieu of Dues (W.I.L.D.) positions.

The following shall apply to these 1 month scholarships:
* 1. Short term scholarships shall only be available to current paying members in good standing.
* 2. The board may create any number of these scholarships up to '''2% of the current membership of the organization'''.
* 3. The Scholarship Commission shall oversee the disbursement of these scholarships.

== Footnotes ==
This policy was originally drafted in December 2025 by [[User:jcmertz | Joe 'theJuggler' Mertz]] with the assistance of ChatGPT and input from many PS:1 members and volunteers.

[[Category:Policies]]
[[Category:Scholarships]]

Scholarship Policy 2026

2026-02-16T06:46:04Z

Jcmertz: added a contextual note around how the formula works

{{Note|type=warn|text=''This page became official policy as a result of the "[[Scholarship Policy Update Vote 2025]]" vote.''}}

== Overview ==
The PS:1 Scholarship Policy is intended to reduce financial barriers to membership, support a diverse and active community of makers and hackers, and align scholarship awards with the space’s purpose and values. Scholarships are time-limited memberships awarded through a recurring application and review process.

<div class="noautonum">__TOC__</div>

== 1. Scholarship Term ==
# Scholarships are awarded for a '''six-month term'''.
# Scholarship members have the same access and responsibilities as regular members during their term, unless otherwise noted in other policies.
# Scholarship recipients are subject to all clauses of the Membership Agreement and all other PS:1 policies. They may receive temporary or permanent bans for violations, the same as any other member.
# Scholarship terms begin on the first day of the month following selection.

== 2. Monthly Application and Selection Process ==
# PS:1 uses a '''monthly scholarship cycle''' rather than limited selection windows during the year.
# The scholarship application remains open year-round, with a clearly posted monthly deadline for each selection cycle.
# Applicants who are not selected in a given month '''must reapply''' to be considered again in future months.
# Continued interest—shown by reapplying, updating responses, and staying engaged—is included as a factor in the selection rubric.
# Applications are reviewed by the Scholarship Commission (or another group designated by the Board) using the rubric in this policy.

== 3. Number of Scholarships Awarded Each Month ==
# The number of scholarships that '''begin in a specific month''' scales with the current membership count.
# The default formula is:

: '''0.5% of current dues-paying membership, rounded to the nearest whole number, with a minimum of 1 scholarship per month.'''
{{Note|type=warn|text=''The intention of this formula was that it would be calculated from a base number including all current members, including Work in Lieu of Dues volunteers. This was agreed upon by the board at the first scholarship designation on February 3rd. When this policy is next updated, it is suggested that this section be updated for clarity.''}}

# Membership count for this purpose is determined as of the first day of the month in which the scholarship term begins.
# The Board may adjust the ratio by Board vote if membership levels or financial conditions change significantly. Any such change must be announced through PS:1’s official communication channels.

== 4. Scholarship Extension ==
# Scholarship recipients may request a '''six-month extension''' during the final month of their scholarship term.
# To request an extension, the recipient must attend a Board meeting and give a short presentation that covers:
## What they’ve accomplished during their first five months at PS:1;
## How the scholarship has supported their work and participation in the community;
## Their goals and plans for the next six months if the scholarship is extended.
# After the presentation, the Board will vote to approve or deny the extension.
# Each scholarship can be extended once under this policy, unless changed by a future member vote.

== 5. Administration ==
# The Scholarship Commission (or another group designated by the Board) is responsible for:
## Maintaining and publishing the scholarship application,
## Reviewing and scoring applications using the rubric in this policy,
## Recommending finalists for each monthly cycle,
## Tracking scholarship start and end dates in the membership system,
## Coordinating with the Board on extension requests and approvals.
# The Scholarship Commission may adopt additional internal processes and guidelines to carry out this policy, as long as they do not conflict with the language of this policy or other PS:1 policies.
# The Scholarship Commission may modify the scholarship application questions and scoring rubric at any time, provided that:
## Any changes are announced via PS:1’s official communication channels (for example, mailing list, forums, and/or Discord as appropriate), and
## This policy page is updated to reflect the current application and rubric.

== 6. Scholarship Application Questions ==
Applicants must answer all required questions honestly and to the best of their ability. The current standard application includes:

=== Why would you like to be considered for a scholarship? ===
''Please write 1–3 paragraphs.''

Tell us what brings you to PS:1 at this point in your life. What opportunities would a scholarship unlock for you? How would it support your goals, interests, or growth?

=== What would you like to make or hack at PS:1? ===
''Please write 1–3 paragraphs.''

You do not need to have a fully formed project. Curiosity and exploration are welcome. Tell us what tools, skills, or ideas excite you and what you hope to learn or create at the space.

=== In your own words, what is the purpose of PS:1? ===
''Please write 1–3 paragraphs.''

There are no right or wrong answers. We want to understand your perspective. What do you think a community workshop/makerspace is for? How do you imagine participating in and contributing to PS:1?

=== Financial Need (multiple choice) ===
''This field has lower weight than the essays but is still considered.''

Which of the following best describes your financial situation in relation to PS:1 membership?

* '''I would not be able to be a member of PS:1 without a scholarship.'''
* '''It would be hard for me to be a member without a scholarship.'''
* '''I can barely afford PS:1, but I could technically make it work.'''
* '''My scholarship request is not need-based.'''
* '''I prefer not to answer.'''

=== Minority Status in the PS:1 Community (optional) ===
Do you self-identify as a minority in the PS:1 community? Examples include BIPOC individuals and people who identify as women or nonbinary, but you may answer based on your own lived experience.

* '''Yes'''
* '''No'''
* '''Prefer not to answer'''

== 7. Scoring Rubric ==
The Scholarship Commission uses the following rubric as a guideline for scoring. Multiple reviewers are encouraged, and scores may be averaged.

=== Essay: Why would you like to be considered for a scholarship? (0–10 points) ===
* '''0–2 points''': Vague or incomplete; no clear personal motivation.
* '''3–5 points''': Some motivation described; limited connection to growth or barriers.
* '''6–8 points''': Clear, thoughtful reasoning; demonstrates how PS:1 would meaningfully benefit the applicant.
* '''9–10 points''': Exceptionally compelling; strong personal narrative, clear barriers, and high potential impact.

=== Essay: What would you like to make or hack at PS:1? (0–10 points) ===
* '''0–2 points''': Minimal information; unclear what the applicant wants to do.
* '''3–5 points''': Some ideas but shallow detail; shows curiosity but not depth.
* '''6–8 points''': Clear goals; shows enthusiasm for making/learning; aligns with PS:1 tools and activities.
* '''9–10 points''': Highly creative, well thought-out goals; strong alignment with PS:1’s culture of experimentation.

=== Essay: In your own words, what is the purpose of a hackerspace/makerspace? (0–10 points) ===
* '''0–2 points''': Little understanding of hackerspace or community workshop ideas; generic or inaccurate answer.
* '''3–5 points''': Basic understanding of a makerspace/community workshop.
* '''6–8 points''': Good insight into the purpose and values of a hackerspace; shows a desire to participate and contribute.
* '''9–10 points''': Deep, thoughtful understanding; expresses values of collaboration, experimentation, and community.

=== Financial Need (0–5 points, low weight) ===
* '''I would not be able to be a member without a scholarship.''' – +5 points
* '''It would be hard for me to be a member without a scholarship.''' – +4 points
* '''I can barely afford PS:1, but I could technically make it work.''' – +2 points
* '''My scholarship request is not need-based.''' – –2 points (mild negative weight; not disqualifying)
* '''I prefer not to answer.''' – 0 points (neutral)

=== Minority Status in the PS:1 Community (0–2 points, very low weight) ===
* '''Yes''' – +2 points
* '''No''' – 0 points
* '''Prefer not to answer''' – 0 points
This factor does not decide selection by itself, but is included to modestly prioritize applicants from underrepresented groups in the community.

=== Repeated Applications (0–5 points, low weight) ===
* +1 Point for every past rejected application, up to 5 points total. An accepted application resets this counter.

=== Past Scholarships (0 - -5 points, low weight) ===
* -1 Point for every past awarded scholarship, up to -5 points total.

== 8. Total Scoring and Selection ==
# A typical total score range is approximately 0–37 points using the rubric above.
# The Scholarship Commission may normalize or average scores across reviewers to account for different scoring styles.
# Final approval of scholarship awards for each month rests with the Board, based on the recommendations of the Scholarship Commission.

== 9. Modification of Application Process ==

The Scholarship Commission may modify the scholarship application questions and scoring rubric at any time, provided that:
* 1. Any changes are announced via PS:1’s official communication channels.
* 2. The Scholarship Policy 2026 page is updated to reflect the current application and rubric.

== 10. Short Term Scholarships ==

In addition to the standard six month scholarship terms, the board may choose to offer 1 month memberships as "bounties" to encourage volunteers to take on short term projects that don't make sense as standard Work in Lieu of Dues (W.I.L.D.) positions.

The following shall apply to these 1 month scholarships:
* 1. Short term scholarships shall only be available to current paying members in good standing.
* 2. The board may create any number of these scholarships up to '''2% of the current membership of the organization'''.
* 3. The Scholarship Commission shall oversee the disbursement of these scholarships.

== Footnotes ==
This policy was originally drafted in December 2025 by [[User:jcmertz | Joe 'theJuggler' Mertz]] with the assistance of ChatGPT and input from many PS:1 members and volunteers.

[[Category:Policies]]
[[Category:Scholarships]]

Dispute Resolution Committee

2026-01-11T18:58:52Z

Jcmertz: /* About the DRC */Fixed erroneous information

==About the DRC==
The DRC is a standing committee convened by the Board of Directors responsible for reviewing disputes, disciplinary matters, and potential violations of the membership agreement. The purpose of the DRC is to assist in the resolution of disputes between members, guests, and/or the organization.

All operational information about the DRC is contained in the most recent version of the [[:File:DisputeResolutionCommittee (DRC) Doc.12.2020.pdf|governance document]].

The DRC currently consists of the following members:

* Lindsay Miller
* Lyn Cole
* Andrew Wingate
* Lydia Miller
* Jennie Plasterer
* Nick Hawley
* Thomas Repasky
* Andrew Locke

==Submit an Issue==
'''Issues may be submitted to the DRC using [https://tinyurl.com/ps1drcform this form].''' If you suspect criminal activity has occurred, please alert the relevant authorities.

==Contact the DRC==

The DRC may be contacted directly at ''drc [at] pumpingstationone [dot] org''. All issues should be submitted via the submission form above.

User:Jcmertz

2025-12-10T19:49:50Z

Jcmertz: /* Things I Do */

Hi! I'm Joe aka theJuggler. I am the very tall guy frequently seen around the space socializing or working on space projects. Feel free to say hi!

==Things I Do==

* '''Scholarship Commission Chair'''
* '''Board Member Emeritus'''
* Former Secretary of the Board
* Former Director at Large on the Board
* Former Lasers Area Host
* Former Member Management Team Lead
* Former Lasers Area Authorizerr
* Former [[Drinking Station: One]] Manager
* '''Tour Guide'''

==My Projects==

*[[PS:1 Club-Mate]]
*[[Drinking Station: One]]
*Flamethrowing Snow Shovel
*Giant Rock-em Sock-em Robots

==Outside of PS:1==
* Controls Integrator at [https://www.taittowers.com/ TAIT]
* Co-Owner of [https://kitchen17.com/ Kitchen 17]
* Co-Owner of [https://amalgamincorporated.com/ Amalgam Incorporated]
* Founder of [http://osmatesoda.com/ The osMate Soda Compan]y
* Organizer of HackPacking 2025 Hacker Backpacking Trip
* Regular at DMen Tap
Find more at: [https://joemertz.com joemertz.com]

Follow me on Mastadon: [https://hackaday.social/@thejuggler thejuggler@hackaday.social]

Scholarship Policy 2026

2025-12-10T19:49:24Z

Jcmertz:

{{Note|type=warn|text=''This page contains the proposed Scholarship Policy referenced by the "[[Scholarship Policy Update Vote 2025]]" vote. If the vote passes, this page becomes the active Scholarship Policy for PS:1.''}}

== Overview ==
The PS:1 Scholarship Policy is intended to reduce financial barriers to membership, support a diverse and active community of makers and hackers, and align scholarship awards with the space’s purpose and values. Scholarships are time-limited memberships awarded through a recurring application and review process.

<div class="noautonum">__TOC__</div>

== 1. Scholarship Term ==
# Scholarships are awarded for a '''six-month term'''.
# Scholarship members have the same access and responsibilities as regular members during their term, unless otherwise noted in other policies.
# Scholarship recipients are subject to all clauses of the Membership Agreement and all other PS:1 policies. They may receive temporary or permanent bans for violations, the same as any other member.
# Scholarship terms begin on the first day of the month following selection.

== 2. Monthly Application and Selection Process ==
# PS:1 uses a '''monthly scholarship cycle''' rather than limited selection windows during the year.
# The scholarship application remains open year-round, with a clearly posted monthly deadline for each selection cycle.
# Applicants who are not selected in a given month '''must reapply''' to be considered again in future months.
# Continued interest—shown by reapplying, updating responses, and staying engaged—is included as a factor in the selection rubric.
# Applications are reviewed by the Scholarship Commission (or another group designated by the Board) using the rubric in this policy.

== 3. Number of Scholarships Awarded Each Month ==
# The number of scholarships that '''begin in a specific month''' scales with the current membership count.
# The default formula is:

: '''0.5% of current dues-paying membership, rounded to the nearest whole number, with a minimum of 1 scholarship per month.'''

# Membership count for this purpose is determined as of the first day of the month in which the scholarship term begins.
# The Board may adjust the ratio by Board vote if membership levels or financial conditions change significantly. Any such change must be announced through PS:1’s official communication channels.

== 4. Scholarship Extension ==
# Scholarship recipients may request a '''six-month extension''' during the final month of their scholarship term.
# To request an extension, the recipient must attend a Board meeting and give a short presentation that covers:
## What they’ve accomplished during their first five months at PS:1;
## How the scholarship has supported their work and participation in the community;
## Their goals and plans for the next six months if the scholarship is extended.
# After the presentation, the Board will vote to approve or deny the extension.
# Each scholarship can be extended once under this policy, unless changed by a future member vote.

== 5. Administration ==
# The Scholarship Commission (or another group designated by the Board) is responsible for:
## Maintaining and publishing the scholarship application,
## Reviewing and scoring applications using the rubric in this policy,
## Recommending finalists for each monthly cycle,
## Tracking scholarship start and end dates in the membership system,
## Coordinating with the Board on extension requests and approvals.
# The Scholarship Commission may adopt additional internal processes and guidelines to carry out this policy, as long as they do not conflict with the language of this policy or other PS:1 policies.
# The Scholarship Commission may modify the scholarship application questions and scoring rubric at any time, provided that:
## Any changes are announced via PS:1’s official communication channels (for example, mailing list, forums, and/or Discord as appropriate), and
## This policy page is updated to reflect the current application and rubric.

== 6. Scholarship Application Questions ==
Applicants must answer all required questions honestly and to the best of their ability. The current standard application includes:

=== Why would you like to be considered for a scholarship? ===
''Please write 1–3 paragraphs.''

Tell us what brings you to PS:1 at this point in your life. What opportunities would a scholarship unlock for you? How would it support your goals, interests, or growth?

=== What would you like to make or hack at PS:1? ===
''Please write 1–3 paragraphs.''

You do not need to have a fully formed project. Curiosity and exploration are welcome. Tell us what tools, skills, or ideas excite you and what you hope to learn or create at the space.

=== In your own words, what is the purpose of PS:1? ===
''Please write 1–3 paragraphs.''

There are no right or wrong answers. We want to understand your perspective. What do you think a community workshop/makerspace is for? How do you imagine participating in and contributing to PS:1?

=== Financial Need (multiple choice) ===
''This field has lower weight than the essays but is still considered.''

Which of the following best describes your financial situation in relation to PS:1 membership?

* '''I would not be able to be a member of PS:1 without a scholarship.'''
* '''It would be hard for me to be a member without a scholarship.'''
* '''I can barely afford PS:1, but I could technically make it work.'''
* '''My scholarship request is not need-based.'''
* '''I prefer not to answer.'''

=== Minority Status in the PS:1 Community (optional) ===
Do you self-identify as a minority in the PS:1 community? Examples include BIPOC individuals and people who identify as women or nonbinary, but you may answer based on your own lived experience.

* '''Yes'''
* '''No'''
* '''Prefer not to answer'''

== 7. Scoring Rubric ==
The Scholarship Commission uses the following rubric as a guideline for scoring. Multiple reviewers are encouraged, and scores may be averaged.

=== Essay: Why would you like to be considered for a scholarship? (0–10 points) ===
* '''0–2 points''': Vague or incomplete; no clear personal motivation.
* '''3–5 points''': Some motivation described; limited connection to growth or barriers.
* '''6–8 points''': Clear, thoughtful reasoning; demonstrates how PS:1 would meaningfully benefit the applicant.
* '''9–10 points''': Exceptionally compelling; strong personal narrative, clear barriers, and high potential impact.

=== Essay: What would you like to make or hack at PS:1? (0–10 points) ===
* '''0–2 points''': Minimal information; unclear what the applicant wants to do.
* '''3–5 points''': Some ideas but shallow detail; shows curiosity but not depth.
* '''6–8 points''': Clear goals; shows enthusiasm for making/learning; aligns with PS:1 tools and activities.
* '''9–10 points''': Highly creative, well thought-out goals; strong alignment with PS:1’s culture of experimentation.

=== Essay: In your own words, what is the purpose of a hackerspace/makerspace? (0–10 points) ===
* '''0–2 points''': Little understanding of hackerspace or community workshop ideas; generic or inaccurate answer.
* '''3–5 points''': Basic understanding of a makerspace/community workshop.
* '''6–8 points''': Good insight into the purpose and values of a hackerspace; shows a desire to participate and contribute.
* '''9–10 points''': Deep, thoughtful understanding; expresses values of collaboration, experimentation, and community.

=== Financial Need (0–5 points, low weight) ===
* '''I would not be able to be a member without a scholarship.''' – +5 points
* '''It would be hard for me to be a member without a scholarship.''' – +4 points
* '''I can barely afford PS:1, but I could technically make it work.''' – +2 points
* '''My scholarship request is not need-based.''' – –2 points (mild negative weight; not disqualifying)
* '''I prefer not to answer.''' – 0 points (neutral)

=== Minority Status in the PS:1 Community (0–2 points, very low weight) ===
* '''Yes''' – +2 points
* '''No''' – 0 points
* '''Prefer not to answer''' – 0 points
This factor does not decide selection by itself, but is included to modestly prioritize applicants from underrepresented groups in the community.

=== Repeated Applications (0–5 points, low weight) ===
* +1 Point for every past rejected application, up to 5 points total. An accepted application resets this counter.

=== Past Scholarships (0 - -5 points, low weight) ===
* -1 Point for every past awarded scholarship, up to -5 points total.

== 8. Total Scoring and Selection ==
# A typical total score range is approximately 0–37 points using the rubric above.
# The Scholarship Commission may normalize or average scores across reviewers to account for different scoring styles.
# Final approval of scholarship awards for each month rests with the Board, based on the recommendations of the Scholarship Commission.

== 9. Modification of Application Process ==

The Scholarship Commission may modify the scholarship application questions and scoring rubric at any time, provided that:
* 1. Any changes are announced via PS:1’s official communication channels.
* 2. The Scholarship Policy 2026 page is updated to reflect the current application and rubric.

== 10. Short Term Scholarships ==

In addition to the standard six month scholarship terms, the board may choose to offer 1 month memberships as "bounties" to encourage volunteers to take on short term projects that don't make sense as standard Work in Lieu of Dues (W.I.L.D.) positions.

The following shall apply to these 1 month scholarships:
* 1. Short term scholarships shall only be available to current paying members in good standing.
* 2. The board may create any number of these scholarships up to '''2% of the current membership of the organization'''.
* 3. The Scholarship Commission shall oversee the disbursement of these scholarships.

== Footnotes ==
This policy was originally drafted in December 2025 by [[User:jcmertz | Joe 'theJuggler' Mertz]] with the assistance of ChatGPT and input from many PS:1 members and volunteers.

[[Category:Policies]]
[[Category:Scholarships]]

Scholarship Policy Update Vote 2025

2025-12-10T19:47:08Z

Jcmertz: /* Sponsor */

== Title==
Scholarship Policy Update Vote 2025

== Sponsor ==
*[[User:jcmertz | Joe 'theJuggler' Mertz (Scholarship Commission Chair and Board Member Emeritus)]]

== Co-Sponsors ==
*[[User:naitotchi | James Lamken (President of the Board)]]
* Ed Bennett (Board Member Emeritus)

== Vote Results ==
Quorum:[ ]
Yea Votes: [ ]
Nay Votes: [ ]
Present or Abstain: [ ]

== Schedule ==
==== Proposal Date ====
Date this proposal was posted to the membership and a request for a vote date was sent to the Board.

'''12/08/2025'''

==== Member Input ====
Does the Sponsor choose to open the language of the vote for changes due to member input? (optional and can be modified at any time)

'''[X] YES [ ] NO'''

==== Vote Announcement and Beginning Date of the Discussion Period ====
The announcement date of the vote proposal is the beginning date of the seven-day (minimum) posting and Member discussion period. (Certain exceptional vote types have longer discussion periods. Check the Bylaws if you are unsure.) If the Sponsor has chosen to include member input, suggested edits can be made in a shared document or other collaborative vehicle until the language is locked. The sponsor can stop taking suggestions at any time.

'''12/08/2025'''

==== Language Lock Date and Start of Voting ====
Five days prior to the Day of the Vote, the vote language is locked, all edits are frozen, and the language of the vote is converted to a pdf file. Ballots that include the pdf are sent to the Membership, and electronic voting begins. Note that the minimum discussion period of seven days leaves only two days for changes before the lock takes place.

'''Requested: 12/11/2025. Actual date to be assigned by the Secretary of the Board.'''

==== Day of the Vote ====

Date the Board has assigned for the vote. The Day of the Vote is the day the vote closes.

'''Requested: 12/16/2025. Actual date to be assigned by the Secretary of the Board.'''

== Background ==
In the current Scholarship Policy, scholarships are awarded only during limited selection windows each year. This makes it harder to respond to changes in membership, financial need, and interest in the space. It also limits how quickly new members who rely on financial assistance can get involved.

This proposal revises the Scholarship Policy to:
* Award scholarships on a '''monthly''' basis instead of only twice a year.
* Standardize scholarships as '''six-month terms.'''
* Scale the number of scholarships to current membership levels.
* Allow scholarship recipients to request a single '''six-month extension''' from the Board based on their activity and contributions.
* Use a clear, equity-minded application and rubric that centers alignment with PS:1’s purpose, creativity, and demonstrated interest.

== Synopsis ==
This vote replaces the existing Scholarship Policy with a new, monthly scholarship model. Scholarships will be granted for six-month terms, with a limited number of slots each month based on a percentage of current membership. Applicants who are not selected in a given month can reapply, and continued interest will be factored into selection.

The new policy also allows scholarship recipients, in the final month of their term, to petition the Board for a one-time six-month extension, based on a short presentation of what they have done and what they plan to do next.

The detailed policy, including the application questions and scoring rubric, is defined on the page [[Scholarship Policy 2026]], which will become the active Scholarship Policy if this vote passes.

== Language of the Vote ==
The membership of Pumping Station: One, NFP votes to repeal all existing Scholarship policies and replace them in full with the policy defined on the page [[Scholarship Policy 2026]]. That page and policy shall become the official Scholarship Policy of PS:1.

== Footnotes ==
This vote was originally drafted in December 2025 by [[User:jcmertz | Joe 'theJuggler' Mertz]] with the assistance of ChatGPT and input from many PS:1 members and volunteers.

[[Category:Votes]]
[[Category:2025 Votes]]

Scholarship Policy Update Vote 2025

2025-12-09T06:40:54Z

Jcmertz: /* Co-Sponsors */

== Title==
Scholarship Policy Update Vote 2025

== Sponsor ==
*[[User:jcmertz | Joe 'theJuggler' Mertz (Scholarship Committee Chair and Board Member Emeritus)]]
== Co-Sponsors ==
*[[User:naitotchi | James Lamken (President of the Board)]]
* Ed Bennett (Board Member Emeritus)

== Vote Results ==
Quorum:[ ]
Yea Votes: [ ]
Nay Votes: [ ]
Present or Abstain: [ ]

== Schedule ==
==== Proposal Date ====
Date this proposal was posted to the membership and a request for a vote date was sent to the Board.

'''12/08/2025'''

==== Member Input ====
Does the Sponsor choose to open the language of the vote for changes due to member input? (optional and can be modified at any time)

'''[X] YES [ ] NO'''

==== Vote Announcement and Beginning Date of the Discussion Period ====
The announcement date of the vote proposal is the beginning date of the seven-day (minimum) posting and Member discussion period. (Certain exceptional vote types have longer discussion periods. Check the Bylaws if you are unsure.) If the Sponsor has chosen to include member input, suggested edits can be made in a shared document or other collaborative vehicle until the language is locked. The sponsor can stop taking suggestions at any time.

'''12/08/2025'''

==== Language Lock Date and Start of Voting ====
Five days prior to the Day of the Vote, the vote language is locked, all edits are frozen, and the language of the vote is converted to a pdf file. Ballots that include the pdf are sent to the Membership, and electronic voting begins. Note that the minimum discussion period of seven days leaves only two days for changes before the lock takes place.

'''Requested: 12/11/2025. Actual date to be assigned by the Secretary of the Board.'''

==== Day of the Vote ====

Date the Board has assigned for the vote. The Day of the Vote is the day the vote closes.

'''Requested: 12/16/2025. Actual date to be assigned by the Secretary of the Board.'''

== Background ==
In the current Scholarship Policy, scholarships are awarded only during limited selection windows each year. This makes it harder to respond to changes in membership, financial need, and interest in the space. It also limits how quickly new members who rely on financial assistance can get involved.

This proposal revises the Scholarship Policy to:
* Award scholarships on a '''monthly''' basis instead of only twice a year.
* Standardize scholarships as '''six-month terms.'''
* Scale the number of scholarships to current membership levels.
* Allow scholarship recipients to request a single '''six-month extension''' from the Board based on their activity and contributions.
* Use a clear, equity-minded application and rubric that centers alignment with PS:1’s purpose, creativity, and demonstrated interest.

== Synopsis ==
This vote replaces the existing Scholarship Policy with a new, monthly scholarship model. Scholarships will be granted for six-month terms, with a limited number of slots each month based on a percentage of current membership. Applicants who are not selected in a given month can reapply, and continued interest will be factored into selection.

The new policy also allows scholarship recipients, in the final month of their term, to petition the Board for a one-time six-month extension, based on a short presentation of what they have done and what they plan to do next.

The detailed policy, including the application questions and scoring rubric, is defined on the page [[Scholarship Policy 2026]], which will become the active Scholarship Policy if this vote passes.

== Language of the Vote ==
The membership of Pumping Station: One, NFP votes to repeal all existing Scholarship policies and replace them in full with the policy defined on the page [[Scholarship Policy 2026]]. That page and policy shall become the official Scholarship Policy of PS:1.

== Footnotes ==
This vote was originally drafted in December 2025 by [[User:jcmertz | Joe 'theJuggler' Mertz]] with the assistance of ChatGPT and input from many PS:1 members and volunteers.

[[Category:Votes]]
[[Category:2025 Votes]]

Scholarship Policy 2026

2025-12-09T06:39:17Z

Jcmertz: /* 8. Total Scoring and Selection */

{{Note|type=warn|text=''This page contains the proposed Scholarship Policy referenced by the "[[Scholarship Policy Update Vote 2025]]" vote. If the vote passes, this page becomes the active Scholarship Policy for PS:1.''}}

== Overview ==
The PS:1 Scholarship Policy is intended to reduce financial barriers to membership, support a diverse and active community of makers and hackers, and align scholarship awards with the space’s purpose and values. Scholarships are time-limited memberships awarded through a recurring application and review process.

<div class="noautonum">__TOC__</div>

== 1. Scholarship Term ==
# Scholarships are awarded for a '''six-month term'''.
# Scholarship members have the same access and responsibilities as regular members during their term, unless otherwise noted in other policies.
# Scholarship recipients are subject to all clauses of the Membership Agreement and all other PS:1 policies. They may receive temporary or permanent bans for violations, the same as any other member.
# Scholarship terms begin on the first day of the month following selection.

== 2. Monthly Application and Selection Process ==
# PS:1 uses a '''monthly scholarship cycle''' rather than limited selection windows during the year.
# The scholarship application remains open year-round, with a clearly posted monthly deadline for each selection cycle.
# Applicants who are not selected in a given month '''must reapply''' to be considered again in future months.
# Continued interest—shown by reapplying, updating responses, and staying engaged—is included as a factor in the selection rubric.
# Applications are reviewed by the Scholarship Committee (or another committee designated by the Board) using the rubric in this policy.

== 3. Number of Scholarships Awarded Each Month ==
# The number of scholarships that '''begin in a specific month''' scales with the current membership count.
# The default formula is:

: '''0.5% of current dues-paying membership, rounded to the nearest whole number, with a minimum of 1 scholarship per month.'''

# Membership count for this purpose is determined as of the first day of the month in which the scholarship term begins.
# The Board may adjust the ratio by Board vote if membership levels or financial conditions change significantly. Any such change must be announced through PS:1’s official communication channels.

== 4. Scholarship Extension ==
# Scholarship recipients may request a '''six-month extension''' during the final month of their scholarship term.
# To request an extension, the recipient must attend a Board meeting and give a short presentation that covers:
## What they’ve accomplished during their first five months at PS:1;
## How the scholarship has supported their work and participation in the community;
## Their goals and plans for the next six months if the scholarship is extended.
# After the presentation, the Board will vote to approve or deny the extension.
# Each scholarship can be extended once under this policy, unless changed by a future member vote.

== 5. Administration ==
# The Scholarship Committee (or another committee designated by the Board) is responsible for:
## Maintaining and publishing the scholarship application,
## Reviewing and scoring applications using the rubric in this policy,
## Recommending finalists for each monthly cycle,
## Tracking scholarship start and end dates in the membership system,
## Coordinating with the Board on extension requests and approvals.
# The Scholarship Committee may adopt additional internal processes and guidelines to carry out this policy, as long as they do not conflict with the language of this policy or other PS:1 policies.
# The Scholarship Committee may modify the scholarship application questions and scoring rubric at any time, provided that:
## Any changes are announced via PS:1’s official communication channels (for example, mailing list, forums, and/or Discord as appropriate), and
## This policy page is updated to reflect the current application and rubric.

== 6. Scholarship Application Questions ==
Applicants must answer all required questions honestly and to the best of their ability. The current standard application includes:

=== Why would you like to be considered for a scholarship? ===
''Please write 1–3 paragraphs.''

Tell us what brings you to PS:1 at this point in your life. What opportunities would a scholarship unlock for you? How would it support your goals, interests, or growth?

=== What would you like to make or hack at PS:1? ===
''Please write 1–3 paragraphs.''

You do not need to have a fully formed project. Curiosity and exploration are welcome. Tell us what tools, skills, or ideas excite you and what you hope to learn or create at the space.

=== In your own words, what is the purpose of PS:1? ===
''Please write 1–3 paragraphs.''

There are no right or wrong answers. We want to understand your perspective. What do you think a community workshop/makerspace is for? How do you imagine participating in and contributing to PS:1?

=== Financial Need (multiple choice) ===
''This field has lower weight than the essays but is still considered.''

Which of the following best describes your financial situation in relation to PS:1 membership?

* '''I would not be able to be a member of PS:1 without a scholarship.'''
* '''It would be hard for me to be a member without a scholarship.'''
* '''I can barely afford PS:1, but I could technically make it work.'''
* '''My scholarship request is not need-based.'''
* '''I prefer not to answer.'''

=== Minority Status in the PS:1 Community (optional) ===
Do you self-identify as a minority in the PS:1 community? Examples include BIPOC individuals and people who identify as women or nonbinary, but you may answer based on your own lived experience.

* '''Yes'''
* '''No'''
* '''Prefer not to answer'''

== 7. Scoring Rubric ==
The Scholarship Committee uses the following rubric as a guideline for scoring. Multiple reviewers are encouraged, and scores may be averaged.

=== Essay: Why would you like to be considered for a scholarship? (0–10 points) ===
* '''0–2 points''': Vague or incomplete; no clear personal motivation.
* '''3–5 points''': Some motivation described; limited connection to growth or barriers.
* '''6–8 points''': Clear, thoughtful reasoning; demonstrates how PS:1 would meaningfully benefit the applicant.
* '''9–10 points''': Exceptionally compelling; strong personal narrative, clear barriers, and high potential impact.

=== Essay: What would you like to make or hack at PS:1? (0–10 points) ===
* '''0–2 points''': Minimal information; unclear what the applicant wants to do.
* '''3–5 points''': Some ideas but shallow detail; shows curiosity but not depth.
* '''6–8 points''': Clear goals; shows enthusiasm for making/learning; aligns with PS:1 tools and activities.
* '''9–10 points''': Highly creative, well thought-out goals; strong alignment with PS:1’s culture of experimentation.

=== Essay: In your own words, what is the purpose of a hackerspace/makerspace? (0–10 points) ===
* '''0–2 points''': Little understanding of hackerspace or community workshop ideas; generic or inaccurate answer.
* '''3–5 points''': Basic understanding of a makerspace/community workshop.
* '''6–8 points''': Good insight into the purpose and values of a hackerspace; shows a desire to participate and contribute.
* '''9–10 points''': Deep, thoughtful understanding; expresses values of collaboration, experimentation, and community.

=== Financial Need (0–5 points, low weight) ===
* '''I would not be able to be a member without a scholarship.''' – +5 points
* '''It would be hard for me to be a member without a scholarship.''' – +4 points
* '''I can barely afford PS:1, but I could technically make it work.''' – +2 points
* '''My scholarship request is not need-based.''' – –2 points (mild negative weight; not disqualifying)
* '''I prefer not to answer.''' – 0 points (neutral)

=== Minority Status in the PS:1 Community (0–2 points, very low weight) ===
* '''Yes''' – +2 points
* '''No''' – 0 points
* '''Prefer not to answer''' – 0 points
This factor does not decide selection by itself, but is included to modestly prioritize applicants from underrepresented groups in the community.

=== Repeated Applications (0–5 points, low weight) ===
* +1 Point for every past rejected application, up to 5 points total. An accepted application resets this counter.

=== Past Scholarships (0 - -5 points, low weight) ===
* -1 Point for every past awarded scholarship, up to -5 points total.

== 8. Total Scoring and Selection ==
# A typical total score range is approximately 0–37 points using the rubric above.
# The Scholarship Committee may normalize or average scores across reviewers to account for different scoring styles.
# Final approval of scholarship awards for each month rests with the Board, based on the recommendations of the Scholarship Committee.

== 9. Modification of Application Process ==

The Scholarship Committee may modify the scholarship application questions and scoring rubric at any time, provided that:
* 1. Any changes are announced via PS:1’s official communication channels.
* 2. The Scholarship Policy 2026 page is updated to reflect the current application and rubric.

== 10. Short Term Scholarships ==

In addition to the standard six month scholarship terms, the board may choose to offer 1 month memberships as "bounties" to encourage volunteers to take on short term projects that don't make sense as standard Work in Lieu of Dues (W.I.L.D.) positions.

The following shall apply to these 1 month scholarships:
* 1. Short term scholarships shall only be available to current paying members in good standing.
* 2. The board may create any number of these scholarships up to '''2% of the current membership of the organization'''.
* 3. The Scholarship Committee shall oversee the disbursement of these scholarships.

== Footnotes ==
This policy was originally drafted in December 2025 by [[User:jcmertz | Joe 'theJuggler' Mertz]] with the assistance of ChatGPT and input from many PS:1 members and volunteers.

[[Category:Policies]]
[[Category:Scholarships]]

Scholarship Policy 2026

2025-12-09T06:38:48Z

Jcmertz: /* Essay: In your own words, what is the purpose of PS:1? (0–10 points) */

{{Note|type=warn|text=''This page contains the proposed Scholarship Policy referenced by the "[[Scholarship Policy Update Vote 2025]]" vote. If the vote passes, this page becomes the active Scholarship Policy for PS:1.''}}

== Overview ==
The PS:1 Scholarship Policy is intended to reduce financial barriers to membership, support a diverse and active community of makers and hackers, and align scholarship awards with the space’s purpose and values. Scholarships are time-limited memberships awarded through a recurring application and review process.

<div class="noautonum">__TOC__</div>

== 1. Scholarship Term ==
# Scholarships are awarded for a '''six-month term'''.
# Scholarship members have the same access and responsibilities as regular members during their term, unless otherwise noted in other policies.
# Scholarship recipients are subject to all clauses of the Membership Agreement and all other PS:1 policies. They may receive temporary or permanent bans for violations, the same as any other member.
# Scholarship terms begin on the first day of the month following selection.

== 2. Monthly Application and Selection Process ==
# PS:1 uses a '''monthly scholarship cycle''' rather than limited selection windows during the year.
# The scholarship application remains open year-round, with a clearly posted monthly deadline for each selection cycle.
# Applicants who are not selected in a given month '''must reapply''' to be considered again in future months.
# Continued interest—shown by reapplying, updating responses, and staying engaged—is included as a factor in the selection rubric.
# Applications are reviewed by the Scholarship Committee (or another committee designated by the Board) using the rubric in this policy.

== 3. Number of Scholarships Awarded Each Month ==
# The number of scholarships that '''begin in a specific month''' scales with the current membership count.
# The default formula is:

: '''0.5% of current dues-paying membership, rounded to the nearest whole number, with a minimum of 1 scholarship per month.'''

# Membership count for this purpose is determined as of the first day of the month in which the scholarship term begins.
# The Board may adjust the ratio by Board vote if membership levels or financial conditions change significantly. Any such change must be announced through PS:1’s official communication channels.

== 4. Scholarship Extension ==
# Scholarship recipients may request a '''six-month extension''' during the final month of their scholarship term.
# To request an extension, the recipient must attend a Board meeting and give a short presentation that covers:
## What they’ve accomplished during their first five months at PS:1;
## How the scholarship has supported their work and participation in the community;
## Their goals and plans for the next six months if the scholarship is extended.
# After the presentation, the Board will vote to approve or deny the extension.
# Each scholarship can be extended once under this policy, unless changed by a future member vote.

== 5. Administration ==
# The Scholarship Committee (or another committee designated by the Board) is responsible for:
## Maintaining and publishing the scholarship application,
## Reviewing and scoring applications using the rubric in this policy,
## Recommending finalists for each monthly cycle,
## Tracking scholarship start and end dates in the membership system,
## Coordinating with the Board on extension requests and approvals.
# The Scholarship Committee may adopt additional internal processes and guidelines to carry out this policy, as long as they do not conflict with the language of this policy or other PS:1 policies.
# The Scholarship Committee may modify the scholarship application questions and scoring rubric at any time, provided that:
## Any changes are announced via PS:1’s official communication channels (for example, mailing list, forums, and/or Discord as appropriate), and
## This policy page is updated to reflect the current application and rubric.

== 6. Scholarship Application Questions ==
Applicants must answer all required questions honestly and to the best of their ability. The current standard application includes:

=== Why would you like to be considered for a scholarship? ===
''Please write 1–3 paragraphs.''

Tell us what brings you to PS:1 at this point in your life. What opportunities would a scholarship unlock for you? How would it support your goals, interests, or growth?

=== What would you like to make or hack at PS:1? ===
''Please write 1–3 paragraphs.''

You do not need to have a fully formed project. Curiosity and exploration are welcome. Tell us what tools, skills, or ideas excite you and what you hope to learn or create at the space.

=== In your own words, what is the purpose of PS:1? ===
''Please write 1–3 paragraphs.''

There are no right or wrong answers. We want to understand your perspective. What do you think a community workshop/makerspace is for? How do you imagine participating in and contributing to PS:1?

=== Financial Need (multiple choice) ===
''This field has lower weight than the essays but is still considered.''

Which of the following best describes your financial situation in relation to PS:1 membership?

* '''I would not be able to be a member of PS:1 without a scholarship.'''
* '''It would be hard for me to be a member without a scholarship.'''
* '''I can barely afford PS:1, but I could technically make it work.'''
* '''My scholarship request is not need-based.'''
* '''I prefer not to answer.'''

=== Minority Status in the PS:1 Community (optional) ===
Do you self-identify as a minority in the PS:1 community? Examples include BIPOC individuals and people who identify as women or nonbinary, but you may answer based on your own lived experience.

* '''Yes'''
* '''No'''
* '''Prefer not to answer'''

== 7. Scoring Rubric ==
The Scholarship Committee uses the following rubric as a guideline for scoring. Multiple reviewers are encouraged, and scores may be averaged.

=== Essay: Why would you like to be considered for a scholarship? (0–10 points) ===
* '''0–2 points''': Vague or incomplete; no clear personal motivation.
* '''3–5 points''': Some motivation described; limited connection to growth or barriers.
* '''6–8 points''': Clear, thoughtful reasoning; demonstrates how PS:1 would meaningfully benefit the applicant.
* '''9–10 points''': Exceptionally compelling; strong personal narrative, clear barriers, and high potential impact.

=== Essay: What would you like to make or hack at PS:1? (0–10 points) ===
* '''0–2 points''': Minimal information; unclear what the applicant wants to do.
* '''3–5 points''': Some ideas but shallow detail; shows curiosity but not depth.
* '''6–8 points''': Clear goals; shows enthusiasm for making/learning; aligns with PS:1 tools and activities.
* '''9–10 points''': Highly creative, well thought-out goals; strong alignment with PS:1’s culture of experimentation.

=== Essay: In your own words, what is the purpose of a hackerspace/makerspace? (0–10 points) ===
* '''0–2 points''': Little understanding of hackerspace or community workshop ideas; generic or inaccurate answer.
* '''3–5 points''': Basic understanding of a makerspace/community workshop.
* '''6–8 points''': Good insight into the purpose and values of a hackerspace; shows a desire to participate and contribute.
* '''9–10 points''': Deep, thoughtful understanding; expresses values of collaboration, experimentation, and community.

=== Financial Need (0–5 points, low weight) ===
* '''I would not be able to be a member without a scholarship.''' – +5 points
* '''It would be hard for me to be a member without a scholarship.''' – +4 points
* '''I can barely afford PS:1, but I could technically make it work.''' – +2 points
* '''My scholarship request is not need-based.''' – –2 points (mild negative weight; not disqualifying)
* '''I prefer not to answer.''' – 0 points (neutral)

=== Minority Status in the PS:1 Community (0–2 points, very low weight) ===
* '''Yes''' – +2 points
* '''No''' – 0 points
* '''Prefer not to answer''' – 0 points
This factor does not decide selection by itself, but is included to modestly prioritize applicants from underrepresented groups in the community.

=== Repeated Applications (0–5 points, low weight) ===
* +1 Point for every past rejected application, up to 5 points total. An accepted application resets this counter.

=== Past Scholarships (0 - -5 points, low weight) ===
* -1 Point for every past awarded scholarship, up to -5 points total.

== 8. Total Scoring and Selection ==
# A typical total score range is approximately 0–37 points using the rubric above.
# The Scholarship Committee may normalize or average scores across reviewers to account for different scoring styles.
# Final recommendations should consider both the numeric scores and the overall mix of recipients, with attention to:
## Alignment with PS:1’s purpose and culture,
## Diversity of projects and interests,
## Financial accessibility and equity,
## Overall community health and participation.
# Final approval of scholarship awards for each month rests with the Board, based on the recommendations of the Scholarship Committee.

== 9. Modification of Application Process ==

The Scholarship Committee may modify the scholarship application questions and scoring rubric at any time, provided that:
* 1. Any changes are announced via PS:1’s official communication channels.
* 2. The Scholarship Policy 2026 page is updated to reflect the current application and rubric.

== 10. Short Term Scholarships ==

In addition to the standard six month scholarship terms, the board may choose to offer 1 month memberships as "bounties" to encourage volunteers to take on short term projects that don't make sense as standard Work in Lieu of Dues (W.I.L.D.) positions.

The following shall apply to these 1 month scholarships:
* 1. Short term scholarships shall only be available to current paying members in good standing.
* 2. The board may create any number of these scholarships up to '''2% of the current membership of the organization'''.
* 3. The Scholarship Committee shall oversee the disbursement of these scholarships.

== Footnotes ==
This policy was originally drafted in December 2025 by [[User:jcmertz | Joe 'theJuggler' Mertz]] with the assistance of ChatGPT and input from many PS:1 members and volunteers.

[[Category:Policies]]
[[Category:Scholarships]]

Scholarship Policy Update Vote 2025

2025-12-09T05:44:20Z

Jcmertz: /* Co-Sponsors */

== Title==
Scholarship Policy Update Vote 2025

== Sponsor ==
*[[User:jcmertz | Joe 'theJuggler' Mertz (Scholarship Committee Chair and Board Member Emeritus)]]
== Co-Sponsors ==
*[[User:naitotchi | James Lamken (President of the Board)]]

== Vote Results ==
Quorum:[ ]
Yea Votes: [ ]
Nay Votes: [ ]
Present or Abstain: [ ]

== Schedule ==
==== Proposal Date ====
Date this proposal was posted to the membership and a request for a vote date was sent to the Board.

'''12/08/2025'''

==== Member Input ====
Does the Sponsor choose to open the language of the vote for changes due to member input? (optional and can be modified at any time)

'''[X] YES [ ] NO'''

==== Vote Announcement and Beginning Date of the Discussion Period ====
The announcement date of the vote proposal is the beginning date of the seven-day (minimum) posting and Member discussion period. (Certain exceptional vote types have longer discussion periods. Check the Bylaws if you are unsure.) If the Sponsor has chosen to include member input, suggested edits can be made in a shared document or other collaborative vehicle until the language is locked. The sponsor can stop taking suggestions at any time.

'''12/08/2025'''

==== Language Lock Date and Start of Voting ====
Five days prior to the Day of the Vote, the vote language is locked, all edits are frozen, and the language of the vote is converted to a pdf file. Ballots that include the pdf are sent to the Membership, and electronic voting begins. Note that the minimum discussion period of seven days leaves only two days for changes before the lock takes place.

'''Requested: 12/11/2025. Actual date to be assigned by the Secretary of the Board.'''

==== Day of the Vote ====

Date the Board has assigned for the vote. The Day of the Vote is the day the vote closes.

'''Requested: 12/16/2025. Actual date to be assigned by the Secretary of the Board.'''

== Background ==
In the current Scholarship Policy, scholarships are awarded only during limited selection windows each year. This makes it harder to respond to changes in membership, financial need, and interest in the space. It also limits how quickly new members who rely on financial assistance can get involved.

This proposal revises the Scholarship Policy to:
* Award scholarships on a '''monthly''' basis instead of only twice a year.
* Standardize scholarships as '''six-month terms.'''
* Scale the number of scholarships to current membership levels.
* Allow scholarship recipients to request a single '''six-month extension''' from the Board based on their activity and contributions.
* Use a clear, equity-minded application and rubric that centers alignment with PS:1’s purpose, creativity, and demonstrated interest.

== Synopsis ==
This vote replaces the existing Scholarship Policy with a new, monthly scholarship model. Scholarships will be granted for six-month terms, with a limited number of slots each month based on a percentage of current membership. Applicants who are not selected in a given month can reapply, and continued interest will be factored into selection.

The new policy also allows scholarship recipients, in the final month of their term, to petition the Board for a one-time six-month extension, based on a short presentation of what they have done and what they plan to do next.

The detailed policy, including the application questions and scoring rubric, is defined on the page [[Scholarship Policy 2026]], which will become the active Scholarship Policy if this vote passes.

== Language of the Vote ==
The membership of Pumping Station: One, NFP votes to repeal all existing Scholarship policies and replace them in full with the policy defined on the page [[Scholarship Policy 2026]]. That page and policy shall become the official Scholarship Policy of PS:1.

== Footnotes ==
This vote was originally drafted in December 2025 by [[User:jcmertz | Joe 'theJuggler' Mertz]] with the assistance of ChatGPT and input from many PS:1 members and volunteers.

[[Category:Votes]]
[[Category:2025 Votes]]

Scholarship Policy Update Vote 2025

2025-12-09T05:44:12Z

Jcmertz:

== Title==
Scholarship Policy Update Vote 2025

== Sponsor ==
*[[User:jcmertz | Joe 'theJuggler' Mertz (Scholarship Committee Chair and Board Member Emeritus)]]
== Co-Sponsors ==
*[[User:naitotchi | James Lamken (President of the Board)
== Vote Results ==
Quorum:[ ]
Yea Votes: [ ]
Nay Votes: [ ]
Present or Abstain: [ ]

== Schedule ==
==== Proposal Date ====
Date this proposal was posted to the membership and a request for a vote date was sent to the Board.

'''12/08/2025'''

==== Member Input ====
Does the Sponsor choose to open the language of the vote for changes due to member input? (optional and can be modified at any time)

'''[X] YES [ ] NO'''

==== Vote Announcement and Beginning Date of the Discussion Period ====
The announcement date of the vote proposal is the beginning date of the seven-day (minimum) posting and Member discussion period. (Certain exceptional vote types have longer discussion periods. Check the Bylaws if you are unsure.) If the Sponsor has chosen to include member input, suggested edits can be made in a shared document or other collaborative vehicle until the language is locked. The sponsor can stop taking suggestions at any time.

'''12/08/2025'''

==== Language Lock Date and Start of Voting ====
Five days prior to the Day of the Vote, the vote language is locked, all edits are frozen, and the language of the vote is converted to a pdf file. Ballots that include the pdf are sent to the Membership, and electronic voting begins. Note that the minimum discussion period of seven days leaves only two days for changes before the lock takes place.

'''Requested: 12/11/2025. Actual date to be assigned by the Secretary of the Board.'''

==== Day of the Vote ====

Date the Board has assigned for the vote. The Day of the Vote is the day the vote closes.

'''Requested: 12/16/2025. Actual date to be assigned by the Secretary of the Board.'''

== Background ==
In the current Scholarship Policy, scholarships are awarded only during limited selection windows each year. This makes it harder to respond to changes in membership, financial need, and interest in the space. It also limits how quickly new members who rely on financial assistance can get involved.

This proposal revises the Scholarship Policy to:
* Award scholarships on a '''monthly''' basis instead of only twice a year.
* Standardize scholarships as '''six-month terms.'''
* Scale the number of scholarships to current membership levels.
* Allow scholarship recipients to request a single '''six-month extension''' from the Board based on their activity and contributions.
* Use a clear, equity-minded application and rubric that centers alignment with PS:1’s purpose, creativity, and demonstrated interest.

== Synopsis ==
This vote replaces the existing Scholarship Policy with a new, monthly scholarship model. Scholarships will be granted for six-month terms, with a limited number of slots each month based on a percentage of current membership. Applicants who are not selected in a given month can reapply, and continued interest will be factored into selection.

The new policy also allows scholarship recipients, in the final month of their term, to petition the Board for a one-time six-month extension, based on a short presentation of what they have done and what they plan to do next.

The detailed policy, including the application questions and scoring rubric, is defined on the page [[Scholarship Policy 2026]], which will become the active Scholarship Policy if this vote passes.

== Language of the Vote ==
The membership of Pumping Station: One, NFP votes to repeal all existing Scholarship policies and replace them in full with the policy defined on the page [[Scholarship Policy 2026]]. That page and policy shall become the official Scholarship Policy of PS:1.

== Footnotes ==
This vote was originally drafted in December 2025 by [[User:jcmertz | Joe 'theJuggler' Mertz]] with the assistance of ChatGPT and input from many PS:1 members and volunteers.

[[Category:Votes]]
[[Category:2025 Votes]]

Scholarship Policy 2026

2025-12-09T05:40:06Z

Jcmertz:

{{Note|type=warn|text=''This page contains the proposed Scholarship Policy referenced by the "[[Scholarship Policy Update Vote 2025]]" vote. If the vote passes, this page becomes the active Scholarship Policy for PS:1.''}}

== Overview ==
The PS:1 Scholarship Policy is intended to reduce financial barriers to membership, support a diverse and active community of makers and hackers, and align scholarship awards with the space’s purpose and values. Scholarships are time-limited memberships awarded through a recurring application and review process.

<div class="noautonum">__TOC__</div>

== 1. Scholarship Term ==
# Scholarships are awarded for a '''six-month term'''.
# Scholarship members have the same access and responsibilities as regular members during their term, unless otherwise noted in other policies.
# Scholarship recipients are subject to all clauses of the Membership Agreement and all other PS:1 policies. They may receive temporary or permanent bans for violations, the same as any other member.
# Scholarship terms begin on the first day of the month following selection.

== 2. Monthly Application and Selection Process ==
# PS:1 uses a '''monthly scholarship cycle''' rather than limited selection windows during the year.
# The scholarship application remains open year-round, with a clearly posted monthly deadline for each selection cycle.
# Applicants who are not selected in a given month '''must reapply''' to be considered again in future months.
# Continued interest—shown by reapplying, updating responses, and staying engaged—is included as a factor in the selection rubric.
# Applications are reviewed by the Scholarship Committee (or another committee designated by the Board) using the rubric in this policy.

== 3. Number of Scholarships Awarded Each Month ==
# The number of scholarships that '''begin in a specific month''' scales with the current membership count.
# The default formula is:

: '''0.5% of current dues-paying membership, rounded to the nearest whole number, with a minimum of 1 scholarship per month.'''

# Membership count for this purpose is determined as of the first day of the month in which the scholarship term begins.
# The Board may adjust the ratio by Board vote if membership levels or financial conditions change significantly. Any such change must be announced through PS:1’s official communication channels.

== 4. Scholarship Extension ==
# Scholarship recipients may request a '''six-month extension''' during the final month of their scholarship term.
# To request an extension, the recipient must attend a Board meeting and give a short presentation that covers:
## What they’ve accomplished during their first five months at PS:1;
## How the scholarship has supported their work and participation in the community;
## Their goals and plans for the next six months if the scholarship is extended.
# After the presentation, the Board will vote to approve or deny the extension.
# Each scholarship can be extended once under this policy, unless changed by a future member vote.

== 5. Administration ==
# The Scholarship Committee (or another committee designated by the Board) is responsible for:
## Maintaining and publishing the scholarship application,
## Reviewing and scoring applications using the rubric in this policy,
## Recommending finalists for each monthly cycle,
## Tracking scholarship start and end dates in the membership system,
## Coordinating with the Board on extension requests and approvals.
# The Scholarship Committee may adopt additional internal processes and guidelines to carry out this policy, as long as they do not conflict with the language of this policy or other PS:1 policies.
# The Scholarship Committee may modify the scholarship application questions and scoring rubric at any time, provided that:
## Any changes are announced via PS:1’s official communication channels (for example, mailing list, forums, and/or Discord as appropriate), and
## This policy page is updated to reflect the current application and rubric.

== 6. Scholarship Application Questions ==
Applicants must answer all required questions honestly and to the best of their ability. The current standard application includes:

=== Why would you like to be considered for a scholarship? ===
''Please write 1–3 paragraphs.''

Tell us what brings you to PS:1 at this point in your life. What opportunities would a scholarship unlock for you? How would it support your goals, interests, or growth?

=== What would you like to make or hack at PS:1? ===
''Please write 1–3 paragraphs.''

You do not need to have a fully formed project. Curiosity and exploration are welcome. Tell us what tools, skills, or ideas excite you and what you hope to learn or create at the space.

=== In your own words, what is the purpose of PS:1? ===
''Please write 1–3 paragraphs.''

There are no right or wrong answers. We want to understand your perspective. What do you think a community workshop/makerspace is for? How do you imagine participating in and contributing to PS:1?

=== Financial Need (multiple choice) ===
''This field has lower weight than the essays but is still considered.''

Which of the following best describes your financial situation in relation to PS:1 membership?

* '''I would not be able to be a member of PS:1 without a scholarship.'''
* '''It would be hard for me to be a member without a scholarship.'''
* '''I can barely afford PS:1, but I could technically make it work.'''
* '''My scholarship request is not need-based.'''
* '''I prefer not to answer.'''

=== Minority Status in the PS:1 Community (optional) ===
Do you self-identify as a minority in the PS:1 community? Examples include BIPOC individuals and people who identify as women or nonbinary, but you may answer based on your own lived experience.

* '''Yes'''
* '''No'''
* '''Prefer not to answer'''

== 7. Scoring Rubric ==
The Scholarship Committee uses the following rubric as a guideline for scoring. Multiple reviewers are encouraged, and scores may be averaged.

=== Essay: Why would you like to be considered for a scholarship? (0–10 points) ===
* '''0–2 points''': Vague or incomplete; no clear personal motivation.
* '''3–5 points''': Some motivation described; limited connection to growth or barriers.
* '''6–8 points''': Clear, thoughtful reasoning; demonstrates how PS:1 would meaningfully benefit the applicant.
* '''9–10 points''': Exceptionally compelling; strong personal narrative, clear barriers, and high potential impact.

=== Essay: What would you like to make or hack at PS:1? (0–10 points) ===
* '''0–2 points''': Minimal information; unclear what the applicant wants to do.
* '''3–5 points''': Some ideas but shallow detail; shows curiosity but not depth.
* '''6–8 points''': Clear goals; shows enthusiasm for making/learning; aligns with PS:1 tools and activities.
* '''9–10 points''': Highly creative, well thought-out goals; strong alignment with PS:1’s culture of experimentation.

=== Essay: In your own words, what is the purpose of PS:1? (0–10 points) ===
* '''0–2 points''': Little understanding of PS:1 or community workshop ideas; generic or inaccurate answer.
* '''3–5 points''': Basic understanding of a makerspace/community workshop.
* '''6–8 points''': Good insight into the purpose and values of PS:1; shows a desire to participate and contribute.
* '''9–10 points''': Deep, thoughtful understanding; expresses values of collaboration, experimentation, and community.

=== Financial Need (0–5 points, low weight) ===
* '''I would not be able to be a member without a scholarship.''' – +5 points
* '''It would be hard for me to be a member without a scholarship.''' – +4 points
* '''I can barely afford PS:1, but I could technically make it work.''' – +2 points
* '''My scholarship request is not need-based.''' – –2 points (mild negative weight; not disqualifying)
* '''I prefer not to answer.''' – 0 points (neutral)

=== Minority Status in the PS:1 Community (0–2 points, very low weight) ===
* '''Yes''' – +2 points
* '''No''' – 0 points
* '''Prefer not to answer''' – 0 points
This factor does not decide selection by itself, but is included to modestly prioritize applicants from underrepresented groups in the community.

=== Repeated Applications (0–5 points, low weight) ===
* +1 Point for every past rejected application, up to 5 points total. An accepted application resets this counter.

=== Past Scholarships (0 - -5 points, low weight) ===
* -1 Point for every past awarded scholarship, up to -5 points total.

== 8. Total Scoring and Selection ==
# A typical total score range is approximately 0–37 points using the rubric above.
# The Scholarship Committee may normalize or average scores across reviewers to account for different scoring styles.
# Final recommendations should consider both the numeric scores and the overall mix of recipients, with attention to:
## Alignment with PS:1’s purpose and culture,
## Diversity of projects and interests,
## Financial accessibility and equity,
## Overall community health and participation.
# Final approval of scholarship awards for each month rests with the Board, based on the recommendations of the Scholarship Committee.

== 9. Modification of Application Process ==

The Scholarship Committee may modify the scholarship application questions and scoring rubric at any time, provided that:
* 1. Any changes are announced via PS:1’s official communication channels.
* 2. The Scholarship Policy 2026 page is updated to reflect the current application and rubric.

== 10. Short Term Scholarships ==

In addition to the standard six month scholarship terms, the board may choose to offer 1 month memberships as "bounties" to encourage volunteers to take on short term projects that don't make sense as standard Work in Lieu of Dues (W.I.L.D.) positions.

The following shall apply to these 1 month scholarships:
* 1. Short term scholarships shall only be available to current paying members in good standing.
* 2. The board may create any number of these scholarships up to '''2% of the current membership of the organization'''.
* 3. The Scholarship Committee shall oversee the disbursement of these scholarships.

== Footnotes ==
This policy was originally drafted in December 2025 by [[User:jcmertz | Joe 'theJuggler' Mertz]] with the assistance of ChatGPT and input from many PS:1 members and volunteers.

[[Category:Policies]]
[[Category:Scholarships]]

Scholarship Policy Update Vote 2025

2025-12-08T01:36:22Z

Jcmertz:

== Title==
Scholarship Policy Update Vote 2025

== Sponsor ==
*[[User:jcmertz | Joe 'theJuggler' Mertz (Scholarship Committee Chair and Board Member Emeritus)]]
== Co-Sponsors ==

== Vote Results ==
Quorum:[ ]
Yea Votes: [ ]
Nay Votes: [ ]
Present or Abstain: [ ]

== Schedule ==
==== Proposal Date ====
Date this proposal was posted to the membership and a request for a vote date was sent to the Board.

'''12/08/2025'''

==== Member Input ====
Does the Sponsor choose to open the language of the vote for changes due to member input? (optional and can be modified at any time)

'''[X] YES [ ] NO'''

==== Vote Announcement and Beginning Date of the Discussion Period ====
The announcement date of the vote proposal is the beginning date of the seven-day (minimum) posting and Member discussion period. (Certain exceptional vote types have longer discussion periods. Check the Bylaws if you are unsure.) If the Sponsor has chosen to include member input, suggested edits can be made in a shared document or other collaborative vehicle until the language is locked. The sponsor can stop taking suggestions at any time.

'''12/08/2025'''

==== Language Lock Date and Start of Voting ====
Five days prior to the Day of the Vote, the vote language is locked, all edits are frozen, and the language of the vote is converted to a pdf file. Ballots that include the pdf are sent to the Membership, and electronic voting begins. Note that the minimum discussion period of seven days leaves only two days for changes before the lock takes place.

'''Requested: 12/11/2025. Actual date to be assigned by the Secretary of the Board.'''

==== Day of the Vote ====

Date the Board has assigned for the vote. The Day of the Vote is the day the vote closes.

'''Requested: 12/16/2025. Actual date to be assigned by the Secretary of the Board.'''

== Background ==
In the current Scholarship Policy, scholarships are awarded only during limited selection windows each year. This makes it harder to respond to changes in membership, financial need, and interest in the space. It also limits how quickly new members who rely on financial assistance can get involved.

This proposal revises the Scholarship Policy to:
* Award scholarships on a '''monthly''' basis instead of only twice a year.
* Standardize scholarships as '''six-month terms.'''
* Scale the number of scholarships to current membership levels.
* Allow scholarship recipients to request a single '''six-month extension''' from the Board based on their activity and contributions.
* Use a clear, equity-minded application and rubric that centers alignment with PS:1’s purpose, creativity, and demonstrated interest.

== Synopsis ==
This vote replaces the existing Scholarship Policy with a new, monthly scholarship model. Scholarships will be granted for six-month terms, with a limited number of slots each month based on a percentage of current membership. Applicants who are not selected in a given month can reapply, and continued interest will be factored into selection.

The new policy also allows scholarship recipients, in the final month of their term, to petition the Board for a one-time six-month extension, based on a short presentation of what they have done and what they plan to do next.

The detailed policy, including the application questions and scoring rubric, is defined on the page [[Scholarship Policy 2026]], which will become the active Scholarship Policy if this vote passes.

== Language of the Vote ==
The membership of Pumping Station: One, NFP votes to repeal all existing Scholarship policies and replace them in full with the policy defined on the page [[Scholarship Policy 2026]]. That page and policy shall become the official Scholarship Policy of PS:1.

== Footnotes ==
This vote was originally drafted in December 2025 by [[User:jcmertz | Joe 'theJuggler' Mertz]] with the assistance of ChatGPT and input from many PS:1 members and volunteers.

[[Category:Votes]]
[[Category:2025 Votes]]

Scholarship Policy Update Vote 2025

2025-12-08T01:33:39Z

Jcmertz: /* Language of the Vote */

== Title==
Scholarship Policy Update Vote 2025

== Sponsor ==
*[[User:jcmertz | Joe 'theJuggler' Mertz (Scholarship Committee Chair and Board Member Emeritus)]]
== Co-Sponsors ==

== Vote Results ==
Quorum:[ ]
Yea Votes: [ ]
Nay Votes: [ ]
Present or Abstain: [ ]

== Schedule ==
==== Proposal Date ====
Date this proposal was posted to the membership and a request for a vote date was sent to the Board.

'''12/08/2025'''

==== Member Input ====
Does the Sponsor choose to open the language of the vote for changes due to member input? (optional and can be modified at any time)

'''[X] YES [ ] NO'''

==== Vote Announcement and Beginning Date of the Discussion Period ====
The announcement date of the vote proposal is the beginning date of the seven-day (minimum) posting and Member discussion period. (Certain exceptional vote types have longer discussion periods. Check the Bylaws if you are unsure.) If the Sponsor has chosen to include member input, suggested edits can be made in a shared document or other collaborative vehicle until the language is locked. The sponsor can stop taking suggestions at any time.

'''12/08/2025'''

==== Language Lock Date and Start of Voting ====
Five days prior to the Day of the Vote, the vote language is locked, all edits are frozen, and the language of the vote is converted to a pdf file. Ballots that include the pdf are sent to the Membership, and electronic voting begins. Note that the minimum discussion period of seven days leaves only two days for changes before the lock takes place.

'''Requested: 12/11/2025. Actual date to be assigned by the Secretary of the Board.'''

==== Day of the Vote ====

Date the Board has assigned for the vote. The Day of the Vote is the day the vote closes.

'''Requested: 12/16/2025. Actual date to be assigned by the Secretary of the Board.'''

== Background ==
In the current Scholarship Policy, scholarships are awarded only during limited selection windows each year. This makes it harder to respond to changes in membership, financial need, and interest in the space. It also limits how quickly new members who rely on financial assistance can get involved.

This proposal revises the Scholarship Policy to:
* Award scholarships on a '''monthly''' basis instead of only twice a year.
* Standardize scholarships as '''six-month terms.'''
* Scale the number of scholarships to current membership levels.
* Allow scholarship recipients to request a single '''six-month extension''' from the Board based on their activity and contributions.
* Use a clear, equity-minded application and rubric that centers alignment with PS:1’s purpose, creativity, and demonstrated interest.

== Synopsis ==
This vote replaces the existing Scholarship Policy with a new, monthly scholarship model. Scholarships will be granted for six-month terms, with a limited number of slots each month based on a percentage of current membership. Applicants who are not selected in a given month can reapply, and continued interest will be factored into selection.

The new policy also allows scholarship recipients, in the final month of their term, to petition the Board for a one-time six-month extension, based on a short presentation of what they have done and what they plan to do next.

The detailed policy, including the application questions and scoring rubric, is defined on the page [[Scholarship Policy 2026]], which will become the active Scholarship Policy if this vote passes.

== Language of the Vote ==
The membership of Pumping Station: One, NFP votes to repeal all existing Scholarship policies and replace them in full with the policy defined on the page [[Scholarship Policy 2026]]. That page and policy shall become the official Scholarship Policy of PS:1.

[[Category:Votes]]
[[Category:2025 Votes]]

Scholarship Policy 2026

2025-12-08T01:32:36Z

Jcmertz:

{{Note|type=warn|text=''This page contains the proposed Scholarship Policy referenced by the "[[Scholarship Policy Update Vote 2025]]" vote. If the vote passes, this page becomes the active Scholarship Policy for PS:1.''}}

== Overview ==
The PS:1 Scholarship Policy is intended to reduce financial barriers to membership, support a diverse and active community of makers and hackers, and align scholarship awards with the space’s purpose and values. Scholarships are time-limited memberships awarded through a recurring application and review process.

<div class="noautonum">__TOC__</div>

== 1. Scholarship Term ==
# Scholarships are awarded for a '''six-month term'''.
# Scholarship members have the same access and responsibilities as regular members during their term, unless otherwise noted in other policies.
# Scholarship recipients are subject to all clauses of the Membership Agreement and all other PS:1 policies. They may receive temporary or permanent bans for violations, the same as any other member.
# Scholarship terms begin on the first day of the month following selection.

== 2. Monthly Application and Selection Process ==
# PS:1 uses a '''monthly scholarship cycle''' rather than limited selection windows during the year.
# The scholarship application remains open year-round, with a clearly posted monthly deadline for each selection cycle.
# Applicants who are not selected in a given month '''must reapply''' to be considered again in future months.
# Continued interest—shown by reapplying, updating responses, and staying engaged—is included as a factor in the selection rubric.
# Applications are reviewed by the Scholarship Committee (or another committee designated by the Board) using the rubric in this policy.

== 3. Number of Scholarships Awarded Each Month ==
# The number of scholarships that '''begin in a specific month''' scales with the current membership count.
# The default formula is:

: '''0.5% of current dues-paying membership, rounded to the nearest whole number, with a minimum of 1 scholarship per month.'''

# Membership count for this purpose is determined as of the first day of the month in which the scholarship term begins.
# The Board may adjust the ratio by Board vote if membership levels or financial conditions change significantly. Any such change must be announced through PS:1’s official communication channels.

== 4. Scholarship Extension ==
# Scholarship recipients may request a '''six-month extension''' during the final month of their scholarship term.
# To request an extension, the recipient must attend a Board meeting and give a short presentation that covers:
## What they’ve accomplished during their first five months at PS:1;
## How the scholarship has supported their work and participation in the community;
## Their goals and plans for the next six months if the scholarship is extended.
# After the presentation, the Board will vote to approve or deny the extension.
# Each scholarship can be extended once under this policy, unless changed by a future member vote.

== 5. Administration ==
# The Scholarship Committee (or another committee designated by the Board) is responsible for:
## Maintaining and publishing the scholarship application,
## Reviewing and scoring applications using the rubric in this policy,
## Recommending finalists for each monthly cycle,
## Tracking scholarship start and end dates in the membership system,
## Coordinating with the Board on extension requests and approvals.
# The Scholarship Committee may adopt additional internal processes and guidelines to carry out this policy, as long as they do not conflict with the language of this policy or other PS:1 policies.
# The Scholarship Committee may modify the scholarship application questions and scoring rubric at any time, provided that:
## Any changes are announced via PS:1’s official communication channels (for example, mailing list, forums, and/or Discord as appropriate), and
## This policy page is updated to reflect the current application and rubric.

== 6. Scholarship Application Questions ==
Applicants must answer all required questions honestly and to the best of their ability. The current standard application includes:

=== Why would you like to be considered for a scholarship? ===
''Please write 1–3 paragraphs.''

Tell us what brings you to PS:1 at this point in your life. What opportunities would a scholarship unlock for you? How would it support your goals, interests, or growth?

=== What would you like to make or hack at PS:1? ===
''Please write 1–3 paragraphs.''

You do not need to have a fully formed project. Curiosity and exploration are welcome. Tell us what tools, skills, or ideas excite you and what you hope to learn or create at the space.

=== In your own words, what is the purpose of PS:1? ===
''Please write 1–3 paragraphs.''

There are no right or wrong answers. We want to understand your perspective. What do you think a community workshop/makerspace is for? How do you imagine participating in and contributing to PS:1?

=== Financial Need (multiple choice) ===
''This field has lower weight than the essays but is still considered.''

Which of the following best describes your financial situation in relation to PS:1 membership?

* '''I would not be able to be a member of PS:1 without a scholarship.'''
* '''It would be hard for me to be a member without a scholarship.'''
* '''I can barely afford PS:1, but I could technically make it work.'''
* '''My scholarship request is not need-based.'''
* '''I prefer not to answer.'''

=== Minority Status in the PS:1 Community (optional) ===
Do you self-identify as a minority in the PS:1 community? Examples include BIPOC individuals and people who identify as women or nonbinary, but you may answer based on your own lived experience.

* '''Yes'''
* '''No'''
* '''Prefer not to answer'''

== 7. Scoring Rubric ==
The Scholarship Committee uses the following rubric as a guideline for scoring. Multiple reviewers are encouraged, and scores may be averaged.

=== Essay: Why would you like to be considered for a scholarship? (0–10 points) ===
* '''0–2 points''': Vague or incomplete; no clear personal motivation.
* '''3–5 points''': Some motivation described; limited connection to growth or barriers.
* '''6–8 points''': Clear, thoughtful reasoning; demonstrates how PS:1 would meaningfully benefit the applicant.
* '''9–10 points''': Exceptionally compelling; strong personal narrative, clear barriers, and high potential impact.

=== Essay: What would you like to make or hack at PS:1? (0–10 points) ===
* '''0–2 points''': Minimal information; unclear what the applicant wants to do.
* '''3–5 points''': Some ideas but shallow detail; shows curiosity but not depth.
* '''6–8 points''': Clear goals; shows enthusiasm for making/learning; aligns with PS:1 tools and activities.
* '''9–10 points''': Highly creative, well thought-out goals; strong alignment with PS:1’s culture of experimentation.

=== Essay: In your own words, what is the purpose of PS:1? (0–10 points) ===
* '''0–2 points''': Little understanding of PS:1 or community workshop ideas; generic or inaccurate answer.
* '''3–5 points''': Basic understanding of a makerspace/community workshop.
* '''6–8 points''': Good insight into the purpose and values of PS:1; shows a desire to participate and contribute.
* '''9–10 points''': Deep, thoughtful understanding; expresses values of collaboration, experimentation, and community.

=== Financial Need (0–5 points, low weight) ===
* '''I would not be able to be a member without a scholarship.''' – +5 points
* '''It would be hard for me to be a member without a scholarship.''' – +4 points
* '''I can barely afford PS:1, but I could technically make it work.''' – +2 points
* '''My scholarship request is not need-based.''' – –2 points (mild negative weight; not disqualifying)
* '''I prefer not to answer.''' – 0 points (neutral)

=== Minority Status in the PS:1 Community (0–2 points, very low weight) ===
* '''Yes''' – +2 points
* '''No''' – 0 points
* '''Prefer not to answer''' – 0 points
This factor does not decide selection by itself, but is included to modestly prioritize applicants from underrepresented groups in the community.

=== Repeated Applications (0–5 points, low weight) ===
* +1 Point for every past rejected application, up to 5 points total. An accepted application resets this counter.

=== Past Scholarships (0 - -5 points, low weight) ===
* -1 Point for every past awarded scholarship, up to -5 points total.

== 8. Total Scoring and Selection ==
# A typical total score range is approximately 0–37 points using the rubric above.
# The Scholarship Committee may normalize or average scores across reviewers to account for different scoring styles.
# Final recommendations should consider both the numeric scores and the overall mix of recipients, with attention to:
## Alignment with PS:1’s purpose and culture,
## Diversity of projects and interests,
## Financial accessibility and equity,
## Overall community health and participation.
# Final approval of scholarship awards for each month rests with the Board, based on the recommendations of the Scholarship Committee.

== 9. Modification of Application Process ==

The Scholarship Committee may modify the scholarship application questions and scoring rubric at any time, provided that:
* 1. Any changes are announced via PS:1’s official communication channels.
* 2. The Scholarship Policy 2026 page is updated to reflect the current application and rubric.

== Footnotes ==
This policy was originally drafted in December 2025 by [[User:jcmertz | Joe 'theJuggler' Mertz]] with the assistance of ChatGPT and input from many PS:1 members and volunteers.

[[Category:Policies]]
[[Category:Scholarships]]

Scholarship Policy 2026

2025-12-08T01:30:43Z

Jcmertz:

{{Note|type=warn|text=''This page contains the proposed Scholarship Policy referenced by the "[[Scholarship Policy Update Vote 2025]]" vote. If the vote passes, this page becomes the active Scholarship Policy for PS:1.''}}

== Overview ==
The PS:1 Scholarship Policy is intended to reduce financial barriers to membership, support a diverse and active community of makers and hackers, and align scholarship awards with the space’s purpose and values. Scholarships are time-limited memberships awarded through a recurring application and review process.

<div class="noautonum">__TOC__</div>

== 1. Scholarship Term ==
# Scholarships are awarded for a '''six-month term'''.
# Scholarship members have the same access and responsibilities as regular members during their term, unless otherwise noted in other policies.
# Scholarship recipients are subject to all clauses of the Membership Agreement and all other PS:1 policies. They may receive temporary or permanent bans for violations, the same as any other member.
# Scholarship terms begin on the first day of the month following selection.

== 2. Monthly Application and Selection Process ==
# PS:1 uses a '''monthly scholarship cycle''' rather than limited selection windows during the year.
# The scholarship application remains open year-round, with a clearly posted monthly deadline for each selection cycle.
# Applicants who are not selected in a given month '''must reapply''' to be considered again in future months.
# Continued interest—shown by reapplying, updating responses, and staying engaged—is included as a factor in the selection rubric.
# Applications are reviewed by the Scholarship Committee (or another committee designated by the Board) using the rubric in this policy.

== 3. Number of Scholarships Awarded Each Month ==
# The number of scholarships that '''begin in a specific month''' scales with the current membership count.
# The default formula is:

: '''0.5% of current dues-paying membership, rounded to the nearest whole number, with a minimum of 1 scholarship per month.'''

# Membership count for this purpose is determined as of the first day of the month in which the scholarship term begins.
# The Board may adjust the ratio by Board vote if membership levels or financial conditions change significantly. Any such change must be announced through PS:1’s official communication channels.

== 4. Scholarship Extension ==
# Scholarship recipients may request a '''six-month extension''' during the final month of their scholarship term.
# To request an extension, the recipient must attend a Board meeting and give a short presentation that covers:
## What they’ve accomplished during their first five months at PS:1;
## How the scholarship has supported their work and participation in the community;
## Their goals and plans for the next six months if the scholarship is extended.
# After the presentation, the Board will vote to approve or deny the extension.
# Each scholarship can be extended once under this policy, unless changed by a future member vote.

== 5. Administration ==
# The Scholarship Committee (or another committee designated by the Board) is responsible for:
## Maintaining and publishing the scholarship application,
## Reviewing and scoring applications using the rubric in this policy,
## Recommending finalists for each monthly cycle,
## Tracking scholarship start and end dates in the membership system,
## Coordinating with the Board on extension requests and approvals.
# The Scholarship Committee may adopt additional internal processes and guidelines to carry out this policy, as long as they do not conflict with the language of this policy or other PS:1 policies.
# The Scholarship Committee may modify the scholarship application questions and scoring rubric at any time, provided that:
## Any changes are announced via PS:1’s official communication channels (for example, mailing list, forums, and/or Discord as appropriate), and
## This policy page is updated to reflect the current application and rubric.

== 6. Scholarship Application Questions ==
Applicants must answer all required questions honestly and to the best of their ability. The current standard application includes:

=== Why would you like to be considered for a scholarship? ===
''Please write 1–3 paragraphs.''

Tell us what brings you to PS:1 at this point in your life. What opportunities would a scholarship unlock for you? How would it support your goals, interests, or growth?

=== What would you like to make or hack at PS:1? ===
''Please write 1–3 paragraphs.''

You do not need to have a fully formed project. Curiosity and exploration are welcome. Tell us what tools, skills, or ideas excite you and what you hope to learn or create at the space.

=== In your own words, what is the purpose of PS:1? ===
''Please write 1–3 paragraphs.''

There are no right or wrong answers. We want to understand your perspective. What do you think a community workshop/makerspace is for? How do you imagine participating in and contributing to PS:1?

=== Financial Need (multiple choice) ===
''This field has lower weight than the essays but is still considered.''

Which of the following best describes your financial situation in relation to PS:1 membership?

* '''I would not be able to be a member of PS:1 without a scholarship.'''
* '''It would be hard for me to be a member without a scholarship.'''
* '''I can barely afford PS:1, but I could technically make it work.'''
* '''My scholarship request is not need-based.'''
* '''I prefer not to answer.'''

=== Minority Status in the PS:1 Community (optional) ===
Do you self-identify as a minority in the PS:1 community? Examples include BIPOC individuals and people who identify as women or nonbinary, but you may answer based on your own lived experience.

* '''Yes'''
* '''No'''
* '''Prefer not to answer'''

== 7. Scoring Rubric ==
The Scholarship Committee uses the following rubric as a guideline for scoring. Multiple reviewers are encouraged, and scores may be averaged.

=== Essay: Why would you like to be considered for a scholarship? (0–10 points) ===
* '''0–2 points''': Vague or incomplete; no clear personal motivation.
* '''3–5 points''': Some motivation described; limited connection to growth or barriers.
* '''6–8 points''': Clear, thoughtful reasoning; demonstrates how PS:1 would meaningfully benefit the applicant.
* '''9–10 points''': Exceptionally compelling; strong personal narrative, clear barriers, and high potential impact.

=== Essay: What would you like to make or hack at PS:1? (0–10 points) ===
* '''0–2 points''': Minimal information; unclear what the applicant wants to do.
* '''3–5 points''': Some ideas but shallow detail; shows curiosity but not depth.
* '''6–8 points''': Clear goals; shows enthusiasm for making/learning; aligns with PS:1 tools and activities.
* '''9–10 points''': Highly creative, well thought-out goals; strong alignment with PS:1’s culture of experimentation.

=== Essay: In your own words, what is the purpose of PS:1? (0–10 points) ===
* '''0–2 points''': Little understanding of PS:1 or community workshop ideas; generic or inaccurate answer.
* '''3–5 points''': Basic understanding of a makerspace/community workshop.
* '''6–8 points''': Good insight into the purpose and values of PS:1; shows a desire to participate and contribute.
* '''9–10 points''': Deep, thoughtful understanding; expresses values of collaboration, experimentation, and community.

=== Financial Need (0–5 points, low weight) ===
* '''I would not be able to be a member without a scholarship.''' – +5 points
* '''It would be hard for me to be a member without a scholarship.''' – +4 points
* '''I can barely afford PS:1, but I could technically make it work.''' – +2 points
* '''My scholarship request is not need-based.''' – –2 points (mild negative weight; not disqualifying)
* '''I prefer not to answer.''' – 0 points (neutral)

=== Minority Status in the PS:1 Community (0–2 points, very low weight) ===
* '''Yes''' – +2 points
* '''No''' – 0 points
* '''Prefer not to answer''' – 0 points
This factor does not decide selection by itself, but is included to modestly prioritize applicants from underrepresented groups in the community.

=== Repeated Applications (0–5 points, low weight) ===
* +1 Point for every past rejected application, up to 5 points total. An accepted application resets this counter.

=== Past Scholarships (0 - -5 points, low weight) ===
* -1 Point for every past awarded scholarship, up to -5 points total.

== 8. Total Scoring and Selection ==
# A typical total score range is approximately 0–37 points using the rubric above.
# The Scholarship Committee may normalize or average scores across reviewers to account for different scoring styles.
# Final recommendations should consider both the numeric scores and the overall mix of recipients, with attention to:
## Alignment with PS:1’s purpose and culture,
## Diversity of projects and interests,
## Financial accessibility and equity,
## Overall community health and participation.
# Final approval of scholarship awards for each month rests with the Board, based on the recommendations of the Scholarship Committee.

== 9. Modification of Application Process ==

The Scholarship Committee may modify the scholarship application questions and scoring rubric at any time, provided that:
* 1. Any changes are announced via PS:1’s official communication channels.
* 2. The Scholarship Policy 2026 page is updated to reflect the current application and rubric.

[[Category:Policies]]
[[Category:Scholarships]]

Scholarship Policy 2026

2025-12-08T01:29:44Z

Jcmertz: /* 7. Scoring Rubric */

{{Note|type=warn|text=''This page contains the proposed Scholarship Policy referenced by the "[[Scholarship Policy Update Vote 2025]]" vote. If the vote passes, this page becomes the active Scholarship Policy for PS:1.''}}

== Overview ==
The PS:1 Scholarship Policy is intended to reduce financial barriers to membership, support a diverse and active community of makers and hackers, and align scholarship awards with the space’s purpose and values. Scholarships are time-limited memberships awarded through a recurring application and review process.

<div class="noautonum">__TOC__</div>

== 1. Scholarship Term ==
# Scholarships are awarded for a '''six-month term'''.
# Scholarship members have the same access and responsibilities as regular members during their term, unless otherwise noted in other policies.
# Scholarship recipients are subject to all clauses of the Membership Agreement and all other PS:1 policies. They may receive temporary or permanent bans for violations, the same as any other member.
# Scholarship terms begin on the first day of the month following selection.

== 2. Monthly Application and Selection Process ==
# PS:1 uses a '''monthly scholarship cycle''' rather than limited selection windows during the year.
# The scholarship application remains open year-round, with a clearly posted monthly deadline for each selection cycle.
# Applicants who are not selected in a given month '''must reapply''' to be considered again in future months.
# Continued interest—shown by reapplying, updating responses, and staying engaged—is included as a factor in the selection rubric.
# Applications are reviewed by the Scholarship Committee (or another committee designated by the Board) using the rubric in this policy.

== 3. Number of Scholarships Awarded Each Month ==
# The number of scholarships that '''begin in a specific month''' scales with the current membership count.
# The default formula is:

: '''0.5% of current dues-paying membership, rounded to the nearest whole number, with a minimum of 1 scholarship per month.'''

# Membership count for this purpose is determined as of the first day of the month in which the scholarship term begins.
# The Board may adjust the ratio by Board vote if membership levels or financial conditions change significantly. Any such change must be announced through PS:1’s official communication channels.

== 4. Scholarship Extension ==
# Scholarship recipients may request a '''six-month extension''' during the final month of their scholarship term.
# To request an extension, the recipient must attend a Board meeting and give a short presentation that covers:
## What they’ve accomplished during their first five months at PS:1;
## How the scholarship has supported their work and participation in the community;
## Their goals and plans for the next six months if the scholarship is extended.
# After the presentation, the Board will vote to approve or deny the extension.
# Each scholarship can be extended once under this policy, unless changed by a future member vote.

== 5. Administration ==
# The Scholarship Committee (or another committee designated by the Board) is responsible for:
## Maintaining and publishing the scholarship application,
## Reviewing and scoring applications using the rubric in this policy,
## Recommending finalists for each monthly cycle,
## Tracking scholarship start and end dates in the membership system,
## Coordinating with the Board on extension requests and approvals.
# The Scholarship Committee may adopt additional internal processes and guidelines to carry out this policy, as long as they do not conflict with the language of this policy or other PS:1 policies.
# The Scholarship Committee may modify the scholarship application questions and scoring rubric at any time, provided that:
## Any changes are announced via PS:1’s official communication channels (for example, mailing list, forums, and/or Discord as appropriate), and
## This policy page is updated to reflect the current application and rubric.

== 6. Scholarship Application Questions ==
Applicants must answer all required questions honestly and to the best of their ability. The current standard application includes:

=== Why would you like to be considered for a scholarship? ===
''Please write 1–3 paragraphs.''

Tell us what brings you to PS:1 at this point in your life. What opportunities would a scholarship unlock for you? How would it support your goals, interests, or growth?

=== What would you like to make or hack at PS:1? ===
''Please write 1–3 paragraphs.''

You do not need to have a fully formed project. Curiosity and exploration are welcome. Tell us what tools, skills, or ideas excite you and what you hope to learn or create at the space.

=== In your own words, what is the purpose of PS:1? ===
''Please write 1–3 paragraphs.''

There are no right or wrong answers. We want to understand your perspective. What do you think a community workshop/makerspace is for? How do you imagine participating in and contributing to PS:1?

=== Financial Need (multiple choice) ===
''This field has lower weight than the essays but is still considered.''

Which of the following best describes your financial situation in relation to PS:1 membership?

* '''I would not be able to be a member of PS:1 without a scholarship.'''
* '''It would be hard for me to be a member without a scholarship.'''
* '''I can barely afford PS:1, but I could technically make it work.'''
* '''My scholarship request is not need-based.'''
* '''I prefer not to answer.'''

=== Minority Status in the PS:1 Community (optional) ===
Do you self-identify as a minority in the PS:1 community? Examples include BIPOC individuals and people who identify as women or nonbinary, but you may answer based on your own lived experience.

* '''Yes'''
* '''No'''
* '''Prefer not to answer'''

== 7. Scoring Rubric ==
The Scholarship Committee uses the following rubric as a guideline for scoring. Multiple reviewers are encouraged, and scores may be averaged.

=== Essay: Why would you like to be considered for a scholarship? (0–10 points) ===
* '''0–2 points''': Vague or incomplete; no clear personal motivation.
* '''3–5 points''': Some motivation described; limited connection to growth or barriers.
* '''6–8 points''': Clear, thoughtful reasoning; demonstrates how PS:1 would meaningfully benefit the applicant.
* '''9–10 points''': Exceptionally compelling; strong personal narrative, clear barriers, and high potential impact.

=== Essay: What would you like to make or hack at PS:1? (0–10 points) ===
* '''0–2 points''': Minimal information; unclear what the applicant wants to do.
* '''3–5 points''': Some ideas but shallow detail; shows curiosity but not depth.
* '''6–8 points''': Clear goals; shows enthusiasm for making/learning; aligns with PS:1 tools and activities.
* '''9–10 points''': Highly creative, well thought-out goals; strong alignment with PS:1’s culture of experimentation.

=== Essay: In your own words, what is the purpose of PS:1? (0–10 points) ===
* '''0–2 points''': Little understanding of PS:1 or community workshop ideas; generic or inaccurate answer.
* '''3–5 points''': Basic understanding of a makerspace/community workshop.
* '''6–8 points''': Good insight into the purpose and values of PS:1; shows a desire to participate and contribute.
* '''9–10 points''': Deep, thoughtful understanding; expresses values of collaboration, experimentation, and community.

=== Financial Need (0–5 points, low weight) ===
* '''I would not be able to be a member without a scholarship.''' – +5 points
* '''It would be hard for me to be a member without a scholarship.''' – +4 points
* '''I can barely afford PS:1, but I could technically make it work.''' – +2 points
* '''My scholarship request is not need-based.''' – –2 points (mild negative weight; not disqualifying)
* '''I prefer not to answer.''' – 0 points (neutral)

=== Minority Status in the PS:1 Community (0–2 points, very low weight) ===
* '''Yes''' – +2 points
* '''No''' – 0 points
* '''Prefer not to answer''' – 0 points
This factor does not decide selection by itself, but is included to modestly prioritize applicants from underrepresented groups in the community.

=== Repeated Applications (0–5 points, low weight) ===
* +1 Point for every past rejected application, up to 5 points total. An accepted application resets this counter.

=== Past Scholarships (0 - -5 points, low weight) ===
* -1 Point for every past awarded scholarship, up to -5 points total.

== 8. Total Scoring and Selection ==
# A typical total score range is approximately 0–37 points using the rubric above.
# The Scholarship Committee may normalize or average scores across reviewers to account for different scoring styles.
# Final recommendations should consider both the numeric scores and the overall mix of recipients, with attention to:
## Alignment with PS:1’s purpose and culture,
## Diversity of projects and interests,
## Financial accessibility and equity,
## Overall community health and participation.
# Final approval of scholarship awards for each month rests with the Board, based on the recommendations of the Scholarship Committee.

[[Category:Policies]]
[[Category:Scholarships]]

Scholarship Policy 2026

2025-12-08T01:28:30Z

Jcmertz: /* 6. Scholarship Application Questions */

{{Note|type=warn|text=''This page contains the proposed Scholarship Policy referenced by the "[[Scholarship Policy Update Vote 2025]]" vote. If the vote passes, this page becomes the active Scholarship Policy for PS:1.''}}

== Overview ==
The PS:1 Scholarship Policy is intended to reduce financial barriers to membership, support a diverse and active community of makers and hackers, and align scholarship awards with the space’s purpose and values. Scholarships are time-limited memberships awarded through a recurring application and review process.

<div class="noautonum">__TOC__</div>

== 1. Scholarship Term ==
# Scholarships are awarded for a '''six-month term'''.
# Scholarship members have the same access and responsibilities as regular members during their term, unless otherwise noted in other policies.
# Scholarship recipients are subject to all clauses of the Membership Agreement and all other PS:1 policies. They may receive temporary or permanent bans for violations, the same as any other member.
# Scholarship terms begin on the first day of the month following selection.

== 2. Monthly Application and Selection Process ==
# PS:1 uses a '''monthly scholarship cycle''' rather than limited selection windows during the year.
# The scholarship application remains open year-round, with a clearly posted monthly deadline for each selection cycle.
# Applicants who are not selected in a given month '''must reapply''' to be considered again in future months.
# Continued interest—shown by reapplying, updating responses, and staying engaged—is included as a factor in the selection rubric.
# Applications are reviewed by the Scholarship Committee (or another committee designated by the Board) using the rubric in this policy.

== 3. Number of Scholarships Awarded Each Month ==
# The number of scholarships that '''begin in a specific month''' scales with the current membership count.
# The default formula is:

: '''0.5% of current dues-paying membership, rounded to the nearest whole number, with a minimum of 1 scholarship per month.'''

# Membership count for this purpose is determined as of the first day of the month in which the scholarship term begins.
# The Board may adjust the ratio by Board vote if membership levels or financial conditions change significantly. Any such change must be announced through PS:1’s official communication channels.

== 4. Scholarship Extension ==
# Scholarship recipients may request a '''six-month extension''' during the final month of their scholarship term.
# To request an extension, the recipient must attend a Board meeting and give a short presentation that covers:
## What they’ve accomplished during their first five months at PS:1;
## How the scholarship has supported their work and participation in the community;
## Their goals and plans for the next six months if the scholarship is extended.
# After the presentation, the Board will vote to approve or deny the extension.
# Each scholarship can be extended once under this policy, unless changed by a future member vote.

== 5. Administration ==
# The Scholarship Committee (or another committee designated by the Board) is responsible for:
## Maintaining and publishing the scholarship application,
## Reviewing and scoring applications using the rubric in this policy,
## Recommending finalists for each monthly cycle,
## Tracking scholarship start and end dates in the membership system,
## Coordinating with the Board on extension requests and approvals.
# The Scholarship Committee may adopt additional internal processes and guidelines to carry out this policy, as long as they do not conflict with the language of this policy or other PS:1 policies.
# The Scholarship Committee may modify the scholarship application questions and scoring rubric at any time, provided that:
## Any changes are announced via PS:1’s official communication channels (for example, mailing list, forums, and/or Discord as appropriate), and
## This policy page is updated to reflect the current application and rubric.

== 6. Scholarship Application Questions ==
Applicants must answer all required questions honestly and to the best of their ability. The current standard application includes:

=== Why would you like to be considered for a scholarship? ===
''Please write 1–3 paragraphs.''

Tell us what brings you to PS:1 at this point in your life. What opportunities would a scholarship unlock for you? How would it support your goals, interests, or growth?

=== What would you like to make or hack at PS:1? ===
''Please write 1–3 paragraphs.''

You do not need to have a fully formed project. Curiosity and exploration are welcome. Tell us what tools, skills, or ideas excite you and what you hope to learn or create at the space.

=== In your own words, what is the purpose of PS:1? ===
''Please write 1–3 paragraphs.''

There are no right or wrong answers. We want to understand your perspective. What do you think a community workshop/makerspace is for? How do you imagine participating in and contributing to PS:1?

=== Financial Need (multiple choice) ===
''This field has lower weight than the essays but is still considered.''

Which of the following best describes your financial situation in relation to PS:1 membership?

* '''I would not be able to be a member of PS:1 without a scholarship.'''
* '''It would be hard for me to be a member without a scholarship.'''
* '''I can barely afford PS:1, but I could technically make it work.'''
* '''My scholarship request is not need-based.'''
* '''I prefer not to answer.'''

=== Minority Status in the PS:1 Community (optional) ===
Do you self-identify as a minority in the PS:1 community? Examples include BIPOC individuals and people who identify as women or nonbinary, but you may answer based on your own lived experience.

* '''Yes'''
* '''No'''
* '''Prefer not to answer'''

== 7. Scoring Rubric ==
The Scholarship Committee uses the following rubric as a guideline for scoring. Multiple reviewers are encouraged, and scores may be averaged.

*The Scholarship Committee may modify the scholarship application questions and scoring rubric at any time, provided that:
** 1. Any changes are announced via PS:1’s official communication channels.
** 2. The Scholarship Policy 2026 page is updated to reflect the current application and rubric.

=== Essay: Why would you like to be considered for a scholarship? (0–10 points) ===
* '''0–2 points''': Vague or incomplete; no clear personal motivation.
* '''3–5 points''': Some motivation described; limited connection to growth or barriers.
* '''6–8 points''': Clear, thoughtful reasoning; demonstrates how PS:1 would meaningfully benefit the applicant.
* '''9–10 points''': Exceptionally compelling; strong personal narrative, clear barriers, and high potential impact.

=== Essay: What would you like to make or hack at PS:1? (0–10 points) ===
* '''0–2 points''': Minimal information; unclear what the applicant wants to do.
* '''3–5 points''': Some ideas but shallow detail; shows curiosity but not depth.
* '''6–8 points''': Clear goals; shows enthusiasm for making/learning; aligns with PS:1 tools and activities.
* '''9–10 points''': Highly creative, well thought-out goals; strong alignment with PS:1’s culture of experimentation.

=== Essay: In your own words, what is the purpose of PS:1? (0–10 points) ===
* '''0–2 points''': Little understanding of PS:1 or community workshop ideas; generic or inaccurate answer.
* '''3–5 points''': Basic understanding of a makerspace/community workshop.
* '''6–8 points''': Good insight into the purpose and values of PS:1; shows a desire to participate and contribute.
* '''9–10 points''': Deep, thoughtful understanding; expresses values of collaboration, experimentation, and community.

=== Financial Need (0–5 points, low weight) ===
* '''I would not be able to be a member without a scholarship.''' – +5 points
* '''It would be hard for me to be a member without a scholarship.''' – +4 points
* '''I can barely afford PS:1, but I could technically make it work.''' – +2 points
* '''My scholarship request is not need-based.''' – –2 points (mild negative weight; not disqualifying)
* '''I prefer not to answer.''' – 0 points (neutral)

=== Minority Status in the PS:1 Community (0–2 points, very low weight) ===
* '''Yes''' – +2 points
* '''No''' – 0 points
* '''Prefer not to answer''' – 0 points
This factor does not decide selection by itself, but is included to modestly prioritize applicants from underrepresented groups in the community.

=== Repeated Applications (0–5 points, low weight) ===
* +1 Point for every past rejected application, up to 5 points total. An accepted application resets this counter.

=== Past Scholarships (0 - -5 points, low weight) ===
* -1 Point for every past awarded scholarship, up to -5 points total.

== 8. Total Scoring and Selection ==
# A typical total score range is approximately 0–37 points using the rubric above.
# The Scholarship Committee may normalize or average scores across reviewers to account for different scoring styles.
# Final recommendations should consider both the numeric scores and the overall mix of recipients, with attention to:
## Alignment with PS:1’s purpose and culture,
## Diversity of projects and interests,
## Financial accessibility and equity,
## Overall community health and participation.
# Final approval of scholarship awards for each month rests with the Board, based on the recommendations of the Scholarship Committee.

[[Category:Policies]]
[[Category:Scholarships]]

Scholarship Policy 2026

2025-12-08T01:27:30Z

Jcmertz:

{{Note|type=warn|text=''This page contains the proposed Scholarship Policy referenced by the "[[Scholarship Policy Update Vote 2025]]" vote. If the vote passes, this page becomes the active Scholarship Policy for PS:1.''}}

== Overview ==
The PS:1 Scholarship Policy is intended to reduce financial barriers to membership, support a diverse and active community of makers and hackers, and align scholarship awards with the space’s purpose and values. Scholarships are time-limited memberships awarded through a recurring application and review process.

<div class="noautonum">__TOC__</div>

== 1. Scholarship Term ==
# Scholarships are awarded for a '''six-month term'''.
# Scholarship members have the same access and responsibilities as regular members during their term, unless otherwise noted in other policies.
# Scholarship recipients are subject to all clauses of the Membership Agreement and all other PS:1 policies. They may receive temporary or permanent bans for violations, the same as any other member.
# Scholarship terms begin on the first day of the month following selection.

== 2. Monthly Application and Selection Process ==
# PS:1 uses a '''monthly scholarship cycle''' rather than limited selection windows during the year.
# The scholarship application remains open year-round, with a clearly posted monthly deadline for each selection cycle.
# Applicants who are not selected in a given month '''must reapply''' to be considered again in future months.
# Continued interest—shown by reapplying, updating responses, and staying engaged—is included as a factor in the selection rubric.
# Applications are reviewed by the Scholarship Committee (or another committee designated by the Board) using the rubric in this policy.

== 3. Number of Scholarships Awarded Each Month ==
# The number of scholarships that '''begin in a specific month''' scales with the current membership count.
# The default formula is:

: '''0.5% of current dues-paying membership, rounded to the nearest whole number, with a minimum of 1 scholarship per month.'''

# Membership count for this purpose is determined as of the first day of the month in which the scholarship term begins.
# The Board may adjust the ratio by Board vote if membership levels or financial conditions change significantly. Any such change must be announced through PS:1’s official communication channels.

== 4. Scholarship Extension ==
# Scholarship recipients may request a '''six-month extension''' during the final month of their scholarship term.
# To request an extension, the recipient must attend a Board meeting and give a short presentation that covers:
## What they’ve accomplished during their first five months at PS:1;
## How the scholarship has supported their work and participation in the community;
## Their goals and plans for the next six months if the scholarship is extended.
# After the presentation, the Board will vote to approve or deny the extension.
# Each scholarship can be extended once under this policy, unless changed by a future member vote.

== 5. Administration ==
# The Scholarship Committee (or another committee designated by the Board) is responsible for:
## Maintaining and publishing the scholarship application,
## Reviewing and scoring applications using the rubric in this policy,
## Recommending finalists for each monthly cycle,
## Tracking scholarship start and end dates in the membership system,
## Coordinating with the Board on extension requests and approvals.
# The Scholarship Committee may adopt additional internal processes and guidelines to carry out this policy, as long as they do not conflict with the language of this policy or other PS:1 policies.
# The Scholarship Committee may modify the scholarship application questions and scoring rubric at any time, provided that:
## Any changes are announced via PS:1’s official communication channels (for example, mailing list, forums, and/or Discord as appropriate), and
## This policy page is updated to reflect the current application and rubric.

== 6. Scholarship Application Questions ==
Applicants must answer all required questions honestly and to the best of their ability. The current standard application includes:

=== 6.1 Why would you like to be considered for a scholarship? ===
''Please write 1–3 paragraphs.''

Tell us what brings you to PS:1 at this point in your life. What opportunities would a scholarship unlock for you? How would it support your goals, interests, or growth?

=== 6.2 What would you like to make or hack at PS:1? ===
''Please write 1–3 paragraphs.''

You do not need to have a fully formed project. Curiosity and exploration are welcome. Tell us what tools, skills, or ideas excite you and what you hope to learn or create at the space.

=== 6.3 In your own words, what is the purpose of PS:1? ===
''Please write 1–3 paragraphs.''

There are no right or wrong answers. We want to understand your perspective. What do you think a community workshop/makerspace is for? How do you imagine participating in and contributing to PS:1?

=== 6.4 Financial Need (multiple choice) ===
''This field has lower weight than the essays but is still considered.''

Which of the following best describes your financial situation in relation to PS:1 membership?

* '''I would not be able to be a member of PS:1 without a scholarship.'''
* '''It would be hard for me to be a member without a scholarship.'''
* '''I can barely afford PS:1, but I could technically make it work.'''
* '''My scholarship request is not need-based.'''
* '''I prefer not to answer.'''

=== 6.5 Minority Status in the PS:1 Community (optional) ===
Do you self-identify as a minority in the PS:1 community? Examples include BIPOC individuals and people who identify as women or nonbinary, but you may answer based on your own lived experience.

* '''Yes'''
* '''No'''
* '''Prefer not to answer'''

== 7. Scoring Rubric ==
The Scholarship Committee uses the following rubric as a guideline for scoring. Multiple reviewers are encouraged, and scores may be averaged.

*The Scholarship Committee may modify the scholarship application questions and scoring rubric at any time, provided that:
** 1. Any changes are announced via PS:1’s official communication channels.
** 2. The Scholarship Policy 2026 page is updated to reflect the current application and rubric.

=== Essay: Why would you like to be considered for a scholarship? (0–10 points) ===
* '''0–2 points''': Vague or incomplete; no clear personal motivation.
* '''3–5 points''': Some motivation described; limited connection to growth or barriers.
* '''6–8 points''': Clear, thoughtful reasoning; demonstrates how PS:1 would meaningfully benefit the applicant.
* '''9–10 points''': Exceptionally compelling; strong personal narrative, clear barriers, and high potential impact.

=== Essay: What would you like to make or hack at PS:1? (0–10 points) ===
* '''0–2 points''': Minimal information; unclear what the applicant wants to do.
* '''3–5 points''': Some ideas but shallow detail; shows curiosity but not depth.
* '''6–8 points''': Clear goals; shows enthusiasm for making/learning; aligns with PS:1 tools and activities.
* '''9–10 points''': Highly creative, well thought-out goals; strong alignment with PS:1’s culture of experimentation.

=== Essay: In your own words, what is the purpose of PS:1? (0–10 points) ===
* '''0–2 points''': Little understanding of PS:1 or community workshop ideas; generic or inaccurate answer.
* '''3–5 points''': Basic understanding of a makerspace/community workshop.
* '''6–8 points''': Good insight into the purpose and values of PS:1; shows a desire to participate and contribute.
* '''9–10 points''': Deep, thoughtful understanding; expresses values of collaboration, experimentation, and community.

=== Financial Need (0–5 points, low weight) ===
* '''I would not be able to be a member without a scholarship.''' – +5 points
* '''It would be hard for me to be a member without a scholarship.''' – +4 points
* '''I can barely afford PS:1, but I could technically make it work.''' – +2 points
* '''My scholarship request is not need-based.''' – –2 points (mild negative weight; not disqualifying)
* '''I prefer not to answer.''' – 0 points (neutral)

=== Minority Status in the PS:1 Community (0–2 points, very low weight) ===
* '''Yes''' – +2 points
* '''No''' – 0 points
* '''Prefer not to answer''' – 0 points
This factor does not decide selection by itself, but is included to modestly prioritize applicants from underrepresented groups in the community.

=== Repeated Applications (0–5 points, low weight) ===
* +1 Point for every past rejected application, up to 5 points total. An accepted application resets this counter.

=== Past Scholarships (0 - -5 points, low weight) ===
* -1 Point for every past awarded scholarship, up to -5 points total.

== 8. Total Scoring and Selection ==
# A typical total score range is approximately 0–37 points using the rubric above.
# The Scholarship Committee may normalize or average scores across reviewers to account for different scoring styles.
# Final recommendations should consider both the numeric scores and the overall mix of recipients, with attention to:
## Alignment with PS:1’s purpose and culture,
## Diversity of projects and interests,
## Financial accessibility and equity,
## Overall community health and participation.
# Final approval of scholarship awards for each month rests with the Board, based on the recommendations of the Scholarship Committee.

[[Category:Policies]]
[[Category:Scholarships]]

Scholarship Policy 2026

2025-12-08T01:22:17Z

Jcmertz:

{{Note|type=warn|text=''This page contains the proposed Scholarship Policy referenced by the "[[Scholarship Policy Update Vote 2025]]" vote. If the vote passes, this page becomes the active Scholarship Policy for PS:1.''}}

== Overview ==
The PS:1 Scholarship Policy is intended to reduce financial barriers to membership, support a diverse and active community of makers and hackers, and align scholarship awards with the space’s purpose and values. Scholarships are time-limited memberships awarded through a recurring application and review process.

<div class="noautonum">__TOC__</div>

== 1. Scholarship Term ==
# Scholarships are awarded for a '''six-month term'''.
# Scholarship members have the same access and responsibilities as regular members during their term, unless otherwise noted in other policies.
# Scholarship recipients are subject to all clauses of the Membership Agreement and all other PS:1 policies. They may receive temporary or permanent bans for violations, the same as any other member.
# Scholarship terms begin on the first day of the month following selection.

== 2. Monthly Application and Selection Process ==
# PS:1 uses a '''monthly scholarship cycle''' rather than limited selection windows during the year.
# The scholarship application remains open year-round, with a clearly posted monthly deadline for each selection cycle.
# Applicants who are not selected in a given month '''must reapply''' to be considered again in future months.
# Continued interest—shown by reapplying, updating responses, and staying engaged—is included as a factor in the selection rubric.
# Applications are reviewed by the Scholarship Committee (or another committee designated by the Board) using the rubric in this policy.

== 3. Number of Scholarships Awarded Each Month ==
# The number of scholarships that '''begin in a specific month''' scales with the current membership count.
# The default formula is:

: '''0.5% of current dues-paying membership, rounded to the nearest whole number, with a minimum of 1 scholarship per month.'''

# Membership count for this purpose is determined as of the first day of the month in which the scholarship term begins.
# The Board may adjust the ratio by Board vote if membership levels or financial conditions change significantly. Any such change must be announced through PS:1’s official communication channels.

== 4. Scholarship Extension ==
# Scholarship recipients may request a '''six-month extension''' during the final month of their scholarship term.
# To request an extension, the recipient must attend a Board meeting and give a short presentation that covers:
## What they’ve accomplished during their first five months at PS:1;
## How the scholarship has supported their work and participation in the community;
## Their goals and plans for the next six months if the scholarship is extended.
# After the presentation, the Board will vote to approve or deny the extension.
# Each scholarship can be extended once under this policy, unless changed by a future member vote.

== 5. Administration ==
# The Scholarship Committee (or another committee designated by the Board) is responsible for:
## Maintaining and publishing the scholarship application,
## Reviewing and scoring applications using the rubric in this policy,
## Recommending finalists for each monthly cycle,
## Tracking scholarship start and end dates in the membership system,
## Coordinating with the Board on extension requests and approvals.
# The Scholarship Committee may adopt additional internal processes and guidelines to carry out this policy, as long as they do not conflict with the language of this policy or other PS:1 policies.
# The Scholarship Committee may modify the scholarship application questions and scoring rubric at any time, provided that:
## Any changes are announced via PS:1’s official communication channels (for example, mailing list, forums, and/or Discord as appropriate), and
## This policy page is updated to reflect the current application and rubric.

== 6. Scholarship Application Questions ==
Applicants must answer all required questions honestly and to the best of their ability. The current standard application includes:

=== 6.1 Why would you like to be considered for a scholarship? ===
''Please write 1–3 paragraphs.''

Tell us what brings you to PS:1 at this point in your life. What opportunities would a scholarship unlock for you? How would it support your goals, interests, or growth?

=== 6.2 What would you like to make or hack at PS:1? ===
''Please write 1–3 paragraphs.''

You do not need to have a fully formed project. Curiosity and exploration are welcome. Tell us what tools, skills, or ideas excite you and what you hope to learn or create at the space.

=== 6.3 In your own words, what is the purpose of PS:1? ===
''Please write 1–3 paragraphs.''

There are no right or wrong answers. We want to understand your perspective. What do you think a community workshop/makerspace is for? How do you imagine participating in and contributing to PS:1?

=== 6.4 Financial Need (multiple choice) ===
''This field has lower weight than the essays but is still considered.''

Which of the following best describes your financial situation in relation to PS:1 membership?

* '''I would not be able to be a member of PS:1 without a scholarship.'''
* '''It would be hard for me to be a member without a scholarship.'''
* '''I can barely afford PS:1, but I could technically make it work.'''
* '''My scholarship request is not need-based.'''
* '''I prefer not to answer.'''

=== 6.5 Minority Status in the PS:1 Community (optional) ===
Do you self-identify as a minority in the PS:1 community? Examples include BIPOC individuals and people who identify as women or nonbinary, but you may answer based on your own lived experience.

* '''Yes'''
* '''No'''
* '''Prefer not to answer'''

== 7. Scoring Rubric ==
The Scholarship Committee uses the following rubric as a guideline for scoring. Multiple reviewers are encouraged, and scores may be averaged. The ranges below are suggested and may be scaled as needed, as long as the relative weights remain similar.

=== 7.1 Essay: Why would you like to be considered for a scholarship? (0–10 points) ===
* '''0–2 points''': Vague or incomplete; no clear personal motivation.
* '''3–5 points''': Some motivation described; limited connection to growth or barriers.
* '''6–8 points''': Clear, thoughtful reasoning; demonstrates how PS:1 would meaningfully benefit the applicant.
* '''9–10 points''': Exceptionally compelling; strong personal narrative, clear barriers, and high potential impact.

=== 7.2 Essay: What would you like to make or hack at PS:1? (0–10 points) ===
* '''0–2 points''': Minimal information; unclear what the applicant wants to do.
* '''3–5 points''': Some ideas but shallow detail; shows curiosity but not depth.
* '''6–8 points''': Clear goals; shows enthusiasm for making/learning; aligns with PS:1 tools and activities.
* '''9–10 points''': Highly creative, well thought-out goals; strong alignment with PS:1’s culture of experimentation.

=== 7.3 Essay: In your own words, what is the purpose of PS:1? (0–10 points) ===
* '''0–2 points''': Little understanding of PS:1 or community workshop ideas; generic or inaccurate answer.
* '''3–5 points''': Basic understanding of a makerspace/community workshop.
* '''6–8 points''': Good insight into the purpose and values of PS:1; shows a desire to participate and contribute.
* '''9–10 points''': Deep, thoughtful understanding; expresses values of collaboration, experimentation, and community.

=== 7.4 Financial Need (0–5 points, low weight) ===
* '''I would not be able to be a member without a scholarship.''' – +5 points
* '''It would be hard for me to be a member without a scholarship.''' – +4 points
* '''I can barely afford PS:1, but I could technically make it work.''' – +2 points
* '''My scholarship request is not need-based.''' – –2 points (mild negative weight; not disqualifying)
* '''I prefer not to answer.''' – 0 points (neutral)

=== 7.5 Minority Status in the PS:1 Community (0–2 points, very low weight) ===
* '''Yes''' – +2 points
* '''No''' – 0 points
* '''Prefer not to answer''' – 0 points

This factor does not decide selection by itself, but is included to modestly prioritize applicants from underrepresented groups in the community.

== 8. Total Scoring and Selection ==
# A typical total score range is approximately 0–37 points using the rubric above.
# The Scholarship Committee may normalize or average scores across reviewers to account for different scoring styles.
# Final recommendations should consider both the numeric scores and the overall mix of recipients, with attention to:
## Alignment with PS:1’s purpose and culture,
## Diversity of projects and interests,
## Financial accessibility and equity,
## Overall community health and participation.
# Final approval of scholarship awards for each month rests with the Board, based on the recommendations of the Scholarship Committee.

[[Category:Policies]]
[[Category:Scholarships]]

Scholarship Policy 2026

2025-12-08T01:19:58Z

Jcmertz: /* 1. Scholarship Term */

{{Note|type=warn|text=''This page contains the proposed Scholarship Policy referenced by the "[[Scholarship Policy Update Vote 2025]]" vote. If the vote passes, this page becomes the active Scholarship Policy for PS:1.''}}

== Overview ==
The PS:1 Scholarship Policy is intended to reduce financial barriers to membership, support a diverse and active community of makers and hackers, and align scholarship awards with the space’s purpose and values. Scholarships are time-limited memberships awarded through a recurring application and review process.

<div class="noautonum">__TOC__</div>

== 1. Scholarship Term ==
# Scholarships are awarded for a '''six-month term'''.
# Scholarship members have the same access and responsibilities as regular members during their term, unless otherwise noted in other policies.
# Scholarship recipients are subject to all clauses of the Membership Agreement and all other PS:1 policies. They may receive temporary or permanent bans for violations, the same as any other member.
# Scholarship terms begin on the first day of the month following selection.

== 2. Monthly Application and Selection Process ==
# PS:1 uses a **monthly scholarship cycle** rather than limited selection windows during the year.
# The scholarship application remains open year-round, with a clearly posted monthly deadline for each selection cycle.
# Applicants who are not selected in a given month **must reapply** to be considered again in future months.
# Continued interest—shown by reapplying, updating responses, and staying engaged—is included as a factor in the selection rubric.
# Applications are reviewed by the Scholarship Committee (or another committee designated by the Board) using the rubric in this policy.

== 3. Number of Scholarships Awarded Each Month ==
# The number of scholarships that **begin in a specific month** scales with the current membership count.
# The default formula is:

: '''0.5% of current dues-paying membership, rounded to the nearest whole number, with a minimum of 1 scholarship per month.'''

# Membership count for this purpose is determined as of the first day of the month in which the scholarship term begins.
# The Board may adjust the ratio by Board vote if membership levels or financial conditions change significantly. Any such change must be announced through PS:1’s official communication channels.

== 4. Scholarship Extension ==
# Scholarship recipients may request a **six-month extension** during the final month of their scholarship term.
# To request an extension, the recipient must attend a Board meeting and give a short presentation that covers:
## What they’ve accomplished during their first five months at PS:1;
## How the scholarship has supported their work and participation in the community;
## Their goals and plans for the next six months if the scholarship is extended.
# After the presentation, the Board will vote to approve or deny the extension.
# Each scholarship can be extended once under this policy, unless changed by a future member vote.

== 5. Administration ==
# The Scholarship Committee (or another committee designated by the Board) is responsible for:
## Maintaining and publishing the scholarship application,
## Reviewing and scoring applications using the rubric in this policy,
## Recommending finalists for each monthly cycle,
## Tracking scholarship start and end dates in the membership system,
## Coordinating with the Board on extension requests and approvals.
# The Scholarship Committee may adopt additional internal processes and guidelines to carry out this policy, as long as they do not conflict with the language of this policy or other PS:1 policies.
# The Scholarship Committee may modify the scholarship application questions and scoring rubric at any time, provided that:
## Any changes are announced via PS:1’s official communication channels (for example, mailing list, forums, and/or Discord as appropriate), and
## This policy page is updated to reflect the current application and rubric.

== 6. Scholarship Application Questions ==
Applicants must answer all required questions honestly and to the best of their ability. The current standard application includes:

=== 6.1 Why would you like to be considered for a scholarship? ===
''Please write 1–3 paragraphs.''

Tell us what brings you to PS:1 at this point in your life. What opportunities would a scholarship unlock for you? How would it support your goals, interests, or growth?

=== 6.2 What would you like to make or hack at PS:1? ===
''Please write 1–3 paragraphs.''

You do not need to have a fully formed project. Curiosity and exploration are welcome. Tell us what tools, skills, or ideas excite you and what you hope to learn or create at the space.

=== 6.3 In your own words, what is the purpose of PS:1? ===
''Please write 1–3 paragraphs.''

There are no right or wrong answers. We want to understand your perspective. What do you think a community workshop/makerspace is for? How do you imagine participating in and contributing to PS:1?

=== 6.4 Financial Need (multiple choice) ===
''This field has lower weight than the essays but is still considered.''

Which of the following best describes your financial situation in relation to PS:1 membership?

* '''I would not be able to be a member of PS:1 without a scholarship.'''
* '''It would be hard for me to be a member without a scholarship.'''
* '''I can barely afford PS:1, but I could technically make it work.'''
* '''My scholarship request is not need-based.'''
* '''I prefer not to answer.'''

=== 6.5 Minority Status in the PS:1 Community (optional) ===
Do you self-identify as a minority in the PS:1 community? Examples include BIPOC individuals and people who identify as women or nonbinary, but you may answer based on your own lived experience.

* '''Yes'''
* '''No'''
* '''Prefer not to answer'''

== 7. Scoring Rubric ==
The Scholarship Committee uses the following rubric as a guideline for scoring. Multiple reviewers are encouraged, and scores may be averaged. The ranges below are suggested and may be scaled as needed, as long as the relative weights remain similar.

=== 7.1 Essay: Why would you like to be considered for a scholarship? (0–10 points) ===
* '''0–2 points''': Vague or incomplete; no clear personal motivation.
* '''3–5 points''': Some motivation described; limited connection to growth or barriers.
* '''6–8 points''': Clear, thoughtful reasoning; demonstrates how PS:1 would meaningfully benefit the applicant.
* '''9–10 points''': Exceptionally compelling; strong personal narrative, clear barriers, and high potential impact.

=== 7.2 Essay: What would you like to make or hack at PS:1? (0–10 points) ===
* '''0–2 points''': Minimal information; unclear what the applicant wants to do.
* '''3–5 points''': Some ideas but shallow detail; shows curiosity but not depth.
* '''6–8 points''': Clear goals; shows enthusiasm for making/learning; aligns with PS:1 tools and activities.
* '''9–10 points''': Highly creative, well thought-out goals; strong alignment with PS:1’s culture of experimentation.

=== 7.3 Essay: In your own words, what is the purpose of PS:1? (0–10 points) ===
* '''0–2 points''': Little understanding of PS:1 or community workshop ideas; generic or inaccurate answer.
* '''3–5 points''': Basic understanding of a makerspace/community workshop.
* '''6–8 points''': Good insight into the purpose and values of PS:1; shows a desire to participate and contribute.
* '''9–10 points''': Deep, thoughtful understanding; expresses values of collaboration, experimentation, and community.

=== 7.4 Financial Need (0–5 points, low weight) ===
* '''I would not be able to be a member without a scholarship.''' – +5 points
* '''It would be hard for me to be a member without a scholarship.''' – +4 points
* '''I can barely afford PS:1, but I could technically make it work.''' – +2 points
* '''My scholarship request is not need-based.''' – –1 to –2 points (mild negative weight; not disqualifying)
* '''I prefer not to answer.''' – 0 points (neutral)

Negative scoring for this field should be capped at –2 so that financial need does not overwhelm the rest of the rubric.

=== 7.5 Minority Status in the PS:1 Community (0–2 points, very low weight) ===
* '''Yes''' – +2 points
* '''No''' – 0 points
* '''Prefer not to answer''' – 0 points

This factor does not decide selection by itself, but is included to modestly prioritize applicants from underrepresented groups in the community.

== 8. Total Scoring and Selection ==
# A typical total score range is approximately 0–37 points using the rubric above.
# The Scholarship Committee may normalize or average scores across reviewers to account for different scoring styles.
# Final recommendations should consider both the numeric scores and the overall mix of recipients, with attention to:
## Alignment with PS:1’s purpose and culture,
## Diversity of projects and interests,
## Financial accessibility and equity,
## Overall community health and participation.
# Final approval of scholarship awards for each month rests with the Board, based on the recommendations of the Scholarship Committee.

[[Category:Policies]]
[[Category:Scholarships]]

User:Jcmertz

2025-12-08T01:18:42Z

Jcmertz: /* Things I Do */

Hi! I'm Joe aka theJuggler. I am the very tall guy frequently seen around the space socializing or working on space projects. Feel free to say hi!

==Things I Do==

* '''Scholarship Committee Chair'''
* '''Board Member Emeritus'''
* Former Secretary of the Board
* Former Director at Large on the Board
* Former Lasers Area Host
* Former Member Management Team Lead
* Former Lasers Area Authorizerr
* Former [[Drinking Station: One]] Manager
* '''Tour Guide'''
==My Projects==

*[[PS:1 Club-Mate]]
*[[Drinking Station: One]]
*Flamethrowing Snow Shovel
*Giant Rock-em Sock-em Robots

==Outside of PS:1==
* Controls Integrator at [https://www.taittowers.com/ TAIT]
* Co-Owner of [https://kitchen17.com/ Kitchen 17]
* Co-Owner of [https://amalgamincorporated.com/ Amalgam Incorporated]
* Founder of [http://osmatesoda.com/ The osMate Soda Compan]y
* Organizer of HackPacking 2025 Hacker Backpacking Trip
* Regular at DMen Tap
Find more at: [https://joemertz.com joemertz.com]

Follow me on Mastadon: [https://hackaday.social/@thejuggler thejuggler@hackaday.social]

User:Jcmertz

2025-12-08T01:18:17Z

Jcmertz:

Hi! I'm Joe aka theJuggler. I am the very tall guy frequently seen around the space socializing or working on space projects. Feel free to say hi!

==Things I Do==

* Scholarship Committee Chair
* Board Member Emeritus
* Former Secretary of the Board
* Former Director at Large on the Board
* Former Lasers Area Host
* Former Member Management Team Lead
* Former Lasers Area Authorizerr
* Former [[Drinking Station: One]] Manager
* Tour Guide
==My Projects==

*[[PS:1 Club-Mate]]
*[[Drinking Station: One]]
*Flamethrowing Snow Shovel
*Giant Rock-em Sock-em Robots

==Outside of PS:1==
* Controls Integrator at [https://www.taittowers.com/ TAIT]
* Co-Owner of [https://kitchen17.com/ Kitchen 17]
* Co-Owner of [https://amalgamincorporated.com/ Amalgam Incorporated]
* Founder of [http://osmatesoda.com/ The osMate Soda Compan]y
* Organizer of HackPacking 2025 Hacker Backpacking Trip
* Regular at DMen Tap
Find more at: [https://joemertz.com joemertz.com]

Follow me on Mastadon: [https://hackaday.social/@thejuggler thejuggler@hackaday.social]

Scholarship Policy Update Vote 2025

2025-12-08T01:13:13Z

Jcmertz: /* Co-Sponsors */

== Title==
Scholarship Policy Update Vote 2025

== Sponsor ==
*[[User:jcmertz | Joe 'theJuggler' Mertz (Scholarship Committee Chair and Board Member Emeritus)]]
== Co-Sponsors ==

== Vote Results ==
Quorum:[ ]
Yea Votes: [ ]
Nay Votes: [ ]
Present or Abstain: [ ]

== Schedule ==
==== Proposal Date ====
Date this proposal was posted to the membership and a request for a vote date was sent to the Board.

'''12/08/2025'''

==== Member Input ====
Does the Sponsor choose to open the language of the vote for changes due to member input? (optional and can be modified at any time)

'''[X] YES [ ] NO'''

==== Vote Announcement and Beginning Date of the Discussion Period ====
The announcement date of the vote proposal is the beginning date of the seven-day (minimum) posting and Member discussion period. (Certain exceptional vote types have longer discussion periods. Check the Bylaws if you are unsure.) If the Sponsor has chosen to include member input, suggested edits can be made in a shared document or other collaborative vehicle until the language is locked. The sponsor can stop taking suggestions at any time.

'''12/08/2025'''

==== Language Lock Date and Start of Voting ====
Five days prior to the Day of the Vote, the vote language is locked, all edits are frozen, and the language of the vote is converted to a pdf file. Ballots that include the pdf are sent to the Membership, and electronic voting begins. Note that the minimum discussion period of seven days leaves only two days for changes before the lock takes place.

'''Requested: 12/11/2025. Actual date to be assigned by the Secretary of the Board.'''

==== Day of the Vote ====

Date the Board has assigned for the vote. The Day of the Vote is the day the vote closes.

'''Requested: 12/16/2025. Actual date to be assigned by the Secretary of the Board.'''

== Background ==
In the current Scholarship Policy, scholarships are awarded only during limited selection windows each year. This makes it harder to respond to changes in membership, financial need, and interest in the space. It also limits how quickly new members who rely on financial assistance can get involved.

This proposal revises the Scholarship Policy to:
* Award scholarships on a '''monthly''' basis instead of only twice a year.
* Standardize scholarships as '''six-month terms.'''
* Scale the number of scholarships to current membership levels.
* Allow scholarship recipients to request a single '''six-month extension''' from the Board based on their activity and contributions.
* Use a clear, equity-minded application and rubric that centers alignment with PS:1’s purpose, creativity, and demonstrated interest.

== Synopsis ==
This vote replaces the existing Scholarship Policy with a new, monthly scholarship model. Scholarships will be granted for six-month terms, with a limited number of slots each month based on a percentage of current membership. Applicants who are not selected in a given month can reapply, and continued interest will be factored into selection.

The new policy also allows scholarship recipients, in the final month of their term, to petition the Board for a one-time six-month extension, based on a short presentation of what they have done and what they plan to do next.

The detailed policy, including the application questions and scoring rubric, is defined on the page [[Scholarship Policy 2026]], which will become the active Scholarship Policy if this vote passes.

== Language of the Vote ==
The membership of Pumping Station: One, NFP votes to repeal all existing Scholarship policies and replace them in full with the policy described on the page [[Scholarship Policy 2026]]. That page shall become the official Scholarship Policy of PS:1.

[[Category:Votes]]
[[Category:2025 Votes]]

Scholarship Policy Update Vote 2025

2025-12-08T01:13:04Z

Jcmertz:

== Title==
Scholarship Policy Update Vote 2025

== Sponsor ==
*[[User:jcmertz | Joe 'theJuggler' Mertz (Scholarship Committee Chair and Board Member Emeritus)]]
== Co-Sponsors ==
''[Co-sponsor 1 handle] ([Co-sponsor 1 real name])''
''[Co-sponsor 2 handle] ([Co-sponsor 2 real name])''
''[Add additional co-sponsors as needed]''

== Vote Results ==
Quorum:[ ]
Yea Votes: [ ]
Nay Votes: [ ]
Present or Abstain: [ ]

== Schedule ==
==== Proposal Date ====
Date this proposal was posted to the membership and a request for a vote date was sent to the Board.

'''12/08/2025'''

==== Member Input ====
Does the Sponsor choose to open the language of the vote for changes due to member input? (optional and can be modified at any time)

'''[X] YES [ ] NO'''

==== Vote Announcement and Beginning Date of the Discussion Period ====
The announcement date of the vote proposal is the beginning date of the seven-day (minimum) posting and Member discussion period. (Certain exceptional vote types have longer discussion periods. Check the Bylaws if you are unsure.) If the Sponsor has chosen to include member input, suggested edits can be made in a shared document or other collaborative vehicle until the language is locked. The sponsor can stop taking suggestions at any time.

'''12/08/2025'''

==== Language Lock Date and Start of Voting ====
Five days prior to the Day of the Vote, the vote language is locked, all edits are frozen, and the language of the vote is converted to a pdf file. Ballots that include the pdf are sent to the Membership, and electronic voting begins. Note that the minimum discussion period of seven days leaves only two days for changes before the lock takes place.

'''Requested: 12/11/2025. Actual date to be assigned by the Secretary of the Board.'''

==== Day of the Vote ====

Date the Board has assigned for the vote. The Day of the Vote is the day the vote closes.

'''Requested: 12/16/2025. Actual date to be assigned by the Secretary of the Board.'''

== Background ==
In the current Scholarship Policy, scholarships are awarded only during limited selection windows each year. This makes it harder to respond to changes in membership, financial need, and interest in the space. It also limits how quickly new members who rely on financial assistance can get involved.

This proposal revises the Scholarship Policy to:
* Award scholarships on a '''monthly''' basis instead of only twice a year.
* Standardize scholarships as '''six-month terms.'''
* Scale the number of scholarships to current membership levels.
* Allow scholarship recipients to request a single '''six-month extension''' from the Board based on their activity and contributions.
* Use a clear, equity-minded application and rubric that centers alignment with PS:1’s purpose, creativity, and demonstrated interest.

== Synopsis ==
This vote replaces the existing Scholarship Policy with a new, monthly scholarship model. Scholarships will be granted for six-month terms, with a limited number of slots each month based on a percentage of current membership. Applicants who are not selected in a given month can reapply, and continued interest will be factored into selection.

The new policy also allows scholarship recipients, in the final month of their term, to petition the Board for a one-time six-month extension, based on a short presentation of what they have done and what they plan to do next.

The detailed policy, including the application questions and scoring rubric, is defined on the page [[Scholarship Policy 2026]], which will become the active Scholarship Policy if this vote passes.

== Language of the Vote ==
The membership of Pumping Station: One, NFP votes to repeal all existing Scholarship policies and replace them in full with the policy described on the page [[Scholarship Policy 2026]]. That page shall become the official Scholarship Policy of PS:1.

[[Category:Votes]]
[[Category:2025 Votes]]

Scholarship Policy Update Vote 2025

2025-12-08T01:10:14Z

Jcmertz: /* Sponsor */

== Title==
Scholarship Policy Update Vote 2025

== Sponsor ==
*[[User:jcmertz | Joe 'theJuggler' Mertz (Scholarship Committee Chair and Board Member Emeritus)]]
== Co-Sponsors ==
''[Co-sponsor 1 handle] ([Co-sponsor 1 real name])''
''[Co-sponsor 2 handle] ([Co-sponsor 2 real name])''
''[Add additional co-sponsors as needed]''

== Vote Results ==
Quorum:[ ]
Yea Votes: [ ]
Nay Votes: [ ]
Present or Abstain: [ ]

== Definition of "Language" ==
"The wording of a legal document." [tfd.com/language]

== Schedule ==
==== Proposal Date ====
Date this proposal was posted to the membership and a request for a vote date was sent to the Board.

'''[DATE]'''

==== Member Input ====
Does the Sponsor choose to open the language of the vote for changes due to member input? (optional and can be modified at any time)

'''[ ] YES [ ] NO'''

==== Vote Announcement and Beginning Date of the Discussion Period ====
The announcement date of the vote proposal is the beginning date of the seven-day (minimum) posting and Member discussion period. (Certain exceptional vote types have longer discussion periods. Check the Bylaws if you are unsure.) If the Sponsor has chosen to include member input, suggested edits can be made in a shared document or other collaborative vehicle until the language is locked. The sponsor can stop taking suggestions at any time.

'''[DATE]'''

==== Language Lock Date and Start of Voting ====
Five days prior to the Day of the Vote, the vote language is locked, all edits are frozen, and the language of the vote is converted to a pdf file. Ballots that include the pdf are sent to the Membership, and electronic voting begins. Note that the minimum discussion period of seven days leaves only two days for changes before the lock takes place.

'''[DATE]'''

==== Day of the Vote ====

Date the Board has assigned for the vote. The Day of the Vote is the day the vote closes.

'''[DATE]'''

== Background ==
In the current Scholarship Policy, scholarships are awarded only during limited selection windows each year. This makes it harder to respond to changes in membership, financial need, and interest in the space. It also limits how quickly new members who rely on financial assistance can get involved.

This proposal revises the Scholarship Policy to:
* Award scholarships on a '''monthly''' basis instead of only twice a year.
* Standardize scholarships as '''six-month terms.'''
* Scale the number of scholarships to current membership levels.
* Allow scholarship recipients to request a single '''six-month extension''' from the Board based on their activity and contributions.
* Use a clear, equity-minded application and rubric that centers alignment with PS:1’s purpose, creativity, and demonstrated interest.

== Synopsis ==
This vote replaces the existing Scholarship Policy with a new, monthly scholarship model. Scholarships will be granted for six-month terms, with a limited number of slots each month based on a percentage of current membership. Applicants who are not selected in a given month can reapply, and continued interest will be factored into selection.

The new policy also allows scholarship recipients, in the final month of their term, to petition the Board for a one-time six-month extension, based on a short presentation of what they have done and what they plan to do next.

The detailed policy, including the application questions and scoring rubric, is defined on the page [[Scholarship Policy 2026]], which will become the active Scholarship Policy if this vote passes.

== Language of the Vote ==
The membership of Pumping Station: One, NFP votes to repeal all existing Scholarship policies and replace them in full with the policy described on the page [[Scholarship Policy 2026]]. That page shall become the official Scholarship Policy of PS:1.

[[Category:Votes]]
[[Category:2025 Votes]]

Scholarship Policy Update Vote 2025

2025-12-08T01:08:42Z

Jcmertz: /* Background */

== Title==
Scholarship Policy Update Vote 2025

== Sponsor ==
''[Sponsor handle] ([Sponsor real name])''

== Co-Sponsors ==
''[Co-sponsor 1 handle] ([Co-sponsor 1 real name])''
''[Co-sponsor 2 handle] ([Co-sponsor 2 real name])''
''[Add additional co-sponsors as needed]''

== Vote Results ==
Quorum:[ ]
Yea Votes: [ ]
Nay Votes: [ ]
Present or Abstain: [ ]

== Definition of "Language" ==
"The wording of a legal document." [tfd.com/language]

== Schedule ==
==== Proposal Date ====
Date this proposal was posted to the membership and a request for a vote date was sent to the Board.

'''[DATE]'''

==== Member Input ====
Does the Sponsor choose to open the language of the vote for changes due to member input? (optional and can be modified at any time)

'''[ ] YES [ ] NO'''

==== Vote Announcement and Beginning Date of the Discussion Period ====
The announcement date of the vote proposal is the beginning date of the seven-day (minimum) posting and Member discussion period. (Certain exceptional vote types have longer discussion periods. Check the Bylaws if you are unsure.) If the Sponsor has chosen to include member input, suggested edits can be made in a shared document or other collaborative vehicle until the language is locked. The sponsor can stop taking suggestions at any time.

'''[DATE]'''

==== Language Lock Date and Start of Voting ====
Five days prior to the Day of the Vote, the vote language is locked, all edits are frozen, and the language of the vote is converted to a pdf file. Ballots that include the pdf are sent to the Membership, and electronic voting begins. Note that the minimum discussion period of seven days leaves only two days for changes before the lock takes place.

'''[DATE]'''

==== Day of the Vote ====

Date the Board has assigned for the vote. The Day of the Vote is the day the vote closes.

'''[DATE]'''

== Background ==
In the current Scholarship Policy, scholarships are awarded only during limited selection windows each year. This makes it harder to respond to changes in membership, financial need, and interest in the space. It also limits how quickly new members who rely on financial assistance can get involved.

This proposal revises the Scholarship Policy to:
* Award scholarships on a '''monthly''' basis instead of only twice a year.
* Standardize scholarships as '''six-month terms.'''
* Scale the number of scholarships to current membership levels.
* Allow scholarship recipients to request a single '''six-month extension''' from the Board based on their activity and contributions.
* Use a clear, equity-minded application and rubric that centers alignment with PS:1’s purpose, creativity, and demonstrated interest.

== Synopsis ==
This vote replaces the existing Scholarship Policy with a new, monthly scholarship model. Scholarships will be granted for six-month terms, with a limited number of slots each month based on a percentage of current membership. Applicants who are not selected in a given month can reapply, and continued interest will be factored into selection.

The new policy also allows scholarship recipients, in the final month of their term, to petition the Board for a one-time six-month extension, based on a short presentation of what they have done and what they plan to do next.

The detailed policy, including the application questions and scoring rubric, is defined on the page [[Scholarship Policy 2026]], which will become the active Scholarship Policy if this vote passes.

== Language of the Vote ==
The membership of Pumping Station: One, NFP votes to repeal all existing Scholarship policies and replace them in full with the policy described on the page [[Scholarship Policy 2026]]. That page shall become the official Scholarship Policy of PS:1.

[[Category:Votes]]
[[Category:2025 Votes]]

Scholarship Policy Update Vote 2025

2025-12-08T01:07:30Z

Jcmertz: /* Language of the Vote */

== Title==
Scholarship Policy Update Vote 2025

== Sponsor ==
''[Sponsor handle] ([Sponsor real name])''

== Co-Sponsors ==
''[Co-sponsor 1 handle] ([Co-sponsor 1 real name])''
''[Co-sponsor 2 handle] ([Co-sponsor 2 real name])''
''[Add additional co-sponsors as needed]''

== Vote Results ==
Quorum:[ ]
Yea Votes: [ ]
Nay Votes: [ ]
Present or Abstain: [ ]

== Definition of "Language" ==
"The wording of a legal document." [tfd.com/language]

== Schedule ==
==== Proposal Date ====
Date this proposal was posted to the membership and a request for a vote date was sent to the Board.

'''[DATE]'''

==== Member Input ====
Does the Sponsor choose to open the language of the vote for changes due to member input? (optional and can be modified at any time)

'''[ ] YES [ ] NO'''

==== Vote Announcement and Beginning Date of the Discussion Period ====
The announcement date of the vote proposal is the beginning date of the seven-day (minimum) posting and Member discussion period. (Certain exceptional vote types have longer discussion periods. Check the Bylaws if you are unsure.) If the Sponsor has chosen to include member input, suggested edits can be made in a shared document or other collaborative vehicle until the language is locked. The sponsor can stop taking suggestions at any time.

'''[DATE]'''

==== Language Lock Date and Start of Voting ====
Five days prior to the Day of the Vote, the vote language is locked, all edits are frozen, and the language of the vote is converted to a pdf file. Ballots that include the pdf are sent to the Membership, and electronic voting begins. Note that the minimum discussion period of seven days leaves only two days for changes before the lock takes place.

'''[DATE]'''

==== Day of the Vote ====

Date the Board has assigned for the vote. The Day of the Vote is the day the vote closes.

'''[DATE]'''

== Background ==
In the current Scholarship Policy, scholarships are awarded only during limited selection windows each year. This makes it harder to respond to changes in membership, financial need, and interest in the space. It also limits how quickly new members who rely on financial assistance can get involved.

This proposal revises the Scholarship Policy to:
* Award scholarships on a **monthly** basis instead of only twice a year.
* Standardize scholarships as **six-month terms**.
* Scale the number of scholarships to current membership levels.
* Allow scholarship recipients to request a single **six-month extension** from the Board based on their activity and contributions.
* Use a clear, equity-minded application and rubric that centers alignment with PS:1’s purpose, creativity, and demonstrated interest.

== Synopsis ==
This vote replaces the existing Scholarship Policy with a new, monthly scholarship model. Scholarships will be granted for six-month terms, with a limited number of slots each month based on a percentage of current membership. Applicants who are not selected in a given month can reapply, and continued interest will be factored into selection.

The new policy also allows scholarship recipients, in the final month of their term, to petition the Board for a one-time six-month extension, based on a short presentation of what they have done and what they plan to do next.

The detailed policy, including the application questions and scoring rubric, is defined on the page [[Scholarship Policy 2026]], which will become the active Scholarship Policy if this vote passes.

== Language of the Vote ==
The membership of Pumping Station: One, NFP votes to repeal all existing Scholarship policies and replace them in full with the policy described on the page [[Scholarship Policy 2026]]. That page shall become the official Scholarship Policy of PS:1.

[[Category:Votes]]
[[Category:2025 Votes]]

Scholarship Policy Update Vote 2025

2025-12-08T01:04:20Z

Jcmertz: /* Synopsis */

== Title==
Scholarship Policy Update Vote 2025

== Sponsor ==
''[Sponsor handle] ([Sponsor real name])''

== Co-Sponsors ==
''[Co-sponsor 1 handle] ([Co-sponsor 1 real name])''
''[Co-sponsor 2 handle] ([Co-sponsor 2 real name])''
''[Add additional co-sponsors as needed]''

== Vote Results ==
Quorum:[ ]
Yea Votes: [ ]
Nay Votes: [ ]
Present or Abstain: [ ]

== Definition of "Language" ==
"The wording of a legal document." [tfd.com/language]

== Schedule ==
==== Proposal Date ====
Date this proposal was posted to the membership and a request for a vote date was sent to the Board.

'''[DATE]'''

==== Member Input ====
Does the Sponsor choose to open the language of the vote for changes due to member input? (optional and can be modified at any time)

'''[ ] YES [ ] NO'''

==== Vote Announcement and Beginning Date of the Discussion Period ====
The announcement date of the vote proposal is the beginning date of the seven-day (minimum) posting and Member discussion period. (Certain exceptional vote types have longer discussion periods. Check the Bylaws if you are unsure.) If the Sponsor has chosen to include member input, suggested edits can be made in a shared document or other collaborative vehicle until the language is locked. The sponsor can stop taking suggestions at any time.

'''[DATE]'''

==== Language Lock Date and Start of Voting ====
Five days prior to the Day of the Vote, the vote language is locked, all edits are frozen, and the language of the vote is converted to a pdf file. Ballots that include the pdf are sent to the Membership, and electronic voting begins. Note that the minimum discussion period of seven days leaves only two days for changes before the lock takes place.

'''[DATE]'''

==== Day of the Vote ====

Date the Board has assigned for the vote. The Day of the Vote is the day the vote closes.

'''[DATE]'''

== Background ==
In the current Scholarship Policy, scholarships are awarded only during limited selection windows each year. This makes it harder to respond to changes in membership, financial need, and interest in the space. It also limits how quickly new members who rely on financial assistance can get involved.

This proposal revises the Scholarship Policy to:
* Award scholarships on a **monthly** basis instead of only twice a year.
* Standardize scholarships as **six-month terms**.
* Scale the number of scholarships to current membership levels.
* Allow scholarship recipients to request a single **six-month extension** from the Board based on their activity and contributions.
* Use a clear, equity-minded application and rubric that centers alignment with PS:1’s purpose, creativity, and demonstrated interest.

== Synopsis ==
This vote replaces the existing Scholarship Policy with a new, monthly scholarship model. Scholarships will be granted for six-month terms, with a limited number of slots each month based on a percentage of current membership. Applicants who are not selected in a given month can reapply, and continued interest will be factored into selection.

The new policy also allows scholarship recipients, in the final month of their term, to petition the Board for a one-time six-month extension, based on a short presentation of what they have done and what they plan to do next.

The detailed policy, including the application questions and scoring rubric, is defined on the page [[Scholarship Policy 2026]], which will become the active Scholarship Policy if this vote passes.

== Language of the Vote ==
Upon passage of this vote:

# The current Scholarship Policy is repealed and replaced in full by the policy described on the page [[Scholarship Policy 2026]]. That page shall become the official Scholarship Policy of PS:1.
# Scholarships shall be awarded on a **monthly** basis, for **six-month terms**, in accordance with the provisions of the Scholarship Policy.
# The number of scholarships that begin in any given month shall be determined using the membership-scaled formula defined in the Scholarship Policy.
# Scholarship recipients in the final month of their term may request a **six-month extension** by presenting their work and plans at a Board meeting, after which the Board will vote to approve or deny the extension, as described in the Scholarship Policy.
# The Scholarship Committee (or another committee designated by the Board) shall administer applications, scoring, recommendations, and record-keeping as defined in the Scholarship Policy.
# The Scholarship Committee may modify the scholarship application questions and scoring rubric at any time, provided that:
## Any changes are announced via PS:1’s official communication channels (for example, mailing list, forums, and/or Discord as appropriate), and
## The [[Scholarship Policy 2026]] page is updated to reflect the current application and rubric.

This vote takes effect immediately upon passage, and the revised Scholarship Policy shall apply to all scholarships awarded after the effective date of this vote.

[[Category:Votes]]
[[Category:2025 Votes]]

Scholarship Policy Update Vote 2025

2025-12-08T01:04:10Z

Jcmertz: /* Language of the Vote */

== Title==
Scholarship Policy Update Vote 2025

== Sponsor ==
''[Sponsor handle] ([Sponsor real name])''

== Co-Sponsors ==
''[Co-sponsor 1 handle] ([Co-sponsor 1 real name])''
''[Co-sponsor 2 handle] ([Co-sponsor 2 real name])''
''[Add additional co-sponsors as needed]''

== Vote Results ==
Quorum:[ ]
Yea Votes: [ ]
Nay Votes: [ ]
Present or Abstain: [ ]

== Definition of "Language" ==
"The wording of a legal document." [tfd.com/language]

== Schedule ==
==== Proposal Date ====
Date this proposal was posted to the membership and a request for a vote date was sent to the Board.

'''[DATE]'''

==== Member Input ====
Does the Sponsor choose to open the language of the vote for changes due to member input? (optional and can be modified at any time)

'''[ ] YES [ ] NO'''

==== Vote Announcement and Beginning Date of the Discussion Period ====
The announcement date of the vote proposal is the beginning date of the seven-day (minimum) posting and Member discussion period. (Certain exceptional vote types have longer discussion periods. Check the Bylaws if you are unsure.) If the Sponsor has chosen to include member input, suggested edits can be made in a shared document or other collaborative vehicle until the language is locked. The sponsor can stop taking suggestions at any time.

'''[DATE]'''

==== Language Lock Date and Start of Voting ====
Five days prior to the Day of the Vote, the vote language is locked, all edits are frozen, and the language of the vote is converted to a pdf file. Ballots that include the pdf are sent to the Membership, and electronic voting begins. Note that the minimum discussion period of seven days leaves only two days for changes before the lock takes place.

'''[DATE]'''

==== Day of the Vote ====

Date the Board has assigned for the vote. The Day of the Vote is the day the vote closes.

'''[DATE]'''

== Background ==
In the current Scholarship Policy, scholarships are awarded only during limited selection windows each year. This makes it harder to respond to changes in membership, financial need, and interest in the space. It also limits how quickly new members who rely on financial assistance can get involved.

This proposal revises the Scholarship Policy to:
* Award scholarships on a **monthly** basis instead of only twice a year.
* Standardize scholarships as **six-month terms**.
* Scale the number of scholarships to current membership levels.
* Allow scholarship recipients to request a single **six-month extension** from the Board based on their activity and contributions.
* Use a clear, equity-minded application and rubric that centers alignment with PS:1’s purpose, creativity, and demonstrated interest.

== Synopsis ==
This vote replaces the existing Scholarship Policy with a new, monthly scholarship model. Scholarships will be granted for six-month terms, with a limited number of slots each month based on a percentage of current membership. Applicants who are not selected in a given month can reapply, and continued interest will be factored into selection.

The new policy also allows scholarship recipients, in the final month of their term, to petition the Board for a one-time six-month extension, based on a short presentation of what they have done and what they plan to do next.

The detailed policy, including the application questions and scoring rubric, is defined on the page [[Scholarship Policy (2025 Revision Proposal)]], which will become the active Scholarship Policy if this vote passes.

== Language of the Vote ==
Upon passage of this vote:

# The current Scholarship Policy is repealed and replaced in full by the policy described on the page [[Scholarship Policy 2026]]. That page shall become the official Scholarship Policy of PS:1.
# Scholarships shall be awarded on a **monthly** basis, for **six-month terms**, in accordance with the provisions of the Scholarship Policy.
# The number of scholarships that begin in any given month shall be determined using the membership-scaled formula defined in the Scholarship Policy.
# Scholarship recipients in the final month of their term may request a **six-month extension** by presenting their work and plans at a Board meeting, after which the Board will vote to approve or deny the extension, as described in the Scholarship Policy.
# The Scholarship Committee (or another committee designated by the Board) shall administer applications, scoring, recommendations, and record-keeping as defined in the Scholarship Policy.
# The Scholarship Committee may modify the scholarship application questions and scoring rubric at any time, provided that:
## Any changes are announced via PS:1’s official communication channels (for example, mailing list, forums, and/or Discord as appropriate), and
## The [[Scholarship Policy 2026]] page is updated to reflect the current application and rubric.

This vote takes effect immediately upon passage, and the revised Scholarship Policy shall apply to all scholarships awarded after the effective date of this vote.

[[Category:Votes]]
[[Category:2025 Votes]]

Scholarship Policy 2026

2025-12-08T01:01:33Z

Jcmertz:

{{Note|type=warn|text=''This page contains the proposed Scholarship Policy referenced by the "[[Scholarship Policy Update Vote 2025]]" vote. If the vote passes, this page becomes the active Scholarship Policy for PS:1.''}}

== Overview ==
The PS:1 Scholarship Policy is intended to reduce financial barriers to membership, support a diverse and active community of makers and hackers, and align scholarship awards with the space’s purpose and values. Scholarships are time-limited memberships awarded through a recurring application and review process.

<div class="noautonum">__TOC__</div>

== 1. Scholarship Term ==
# Scholarships are awarded for a **six-month term**.
# Scholarship members have the same access and responsibilities as regular members during their term, unless otherwise noted in other policies.
# Scholarship recipients are subject to all clauses of the Membership Agreement and all other PS:1 policies. They may receive temporary or permanent bans for violations, the same as any other member.
# Scholarship terms begin on the first day of the month following selection.

== 2. Monthly Application and Selection Process ==
# PS:1 uses a **monthly scholarship cycle** rather than limited selection windows during the year.
# The scholarship application remains open year-round, with a clearly posted monthly deadline for each selection cycle.
# Applicants who are not selected in a given month **must reapply** to be considered again in future months.
# Continued interest—shown by reapplying, updating responses, and staying engaged—is included as a factor in the selection rubric.
# Applications are reviewed by the Scholarship Committee (or another committee designated by the Board) using the rubric in this policy.

== 3. Number of Scholarships Awarded Each Month ==
# The number of scholarships that **begin in a specific month** scales with the current membership count.
# The default formula is:

: '''0.5% of current dues-paying membership, rounded to the nearest whole number, with a minimum of 1 scholarship per month.'''

# Membership count for this purpose is determined as of the first day of the month in which the scholarship term begins.
# The Board may adjust the ratio by Board vote if membership levels or financial conditions change significantly. Any such change must be announced through PS:1’s official communication channels.

== 4. Scholarship Extension ==
# Scholarship recipients may request a **six-month extension** during the final month of their scholarship term.
# To request an extension, the recipient must attend a Board meeting and give a short presentation that covers:
## What they’ve accomplished during their first five months at PS:1;
## How the scholarship has supported their work and participation in the community;
## Their goals and plans for the next six months if the scholarship is extended.
# After the presentation, the Board will vote to approve or deny the extension.
# Each scholarship can be extended once under this policy, unless changed by a future member vote.

== 5. Administration ==
# The Scholarship Committee (or another committee designated by the Board) is responsible for:
## Maintaining and publishing the scholarship application,
## Reviewing and scoring applications using the rubric in this policy,
## Recommending finalists for each monthly cycle,
## Tracking scholarship start and end dates in the membership system,
## Coordinating with the Board on extension requests and approvals.
# The Scholarship Committee may adopt additional internal processes and guidelines to carry out this policy, as long as they do not conflict with the language of this policy or other PS:1 policies.
# The Scholarship Committee may modify the scholarship application questions and scoring rubric at any time, provided that:
## Any changes are announced via PS:1’s official communication channels (for example, mailing list, forums, and/or Discord as appropriate), and
## This policy page is updated to reflect the current application and rubric.

== 6. Scholarship Application Questions ==
Applicants must answer all required questions honestly and to the best of their ability. The current standard application includes:

=== 6.1 Why would you like to be considered for a scholarship? ===
''Please write 1–3 paragraphs.''

Tell us what brings you to PS:1 at this point in your life. What opportunities would a scholarship unlock for you? How would it support your goals, interests, or growth?

=== 6.2 What would you like to make or hack at PS:1? ===
''Please write 1–3 paragraphs.''

You do not need to have a fully formed project. Curiosity and exploration are welcome. Tell us what tools, skills, or ideas excite you and what you hope to learn or create at the space.

=== 6.3 In your own words, what is the purpose of PS:1? ===
''Please write 1–3 paragraphs.''

There are no right or wrong answers. We want to understand your perspective. What do you think a community workshop/makerspace is for? How do you imagine participating in and contributing to PS:1?

=== 6.4 Financial Need (multiple choice) ===
''This field has lower weight than the essays but is still considered.''

Which of the following best describes your financial situation in relation to PS:1 membership?

* '''I would not be able to be a member of PS:1 without a scholarship.'''
* '''It would be hard for me to be a member without a scholarship.'''
* '''I can barely afford PS:1, but I could technically make it work.'''
* '''My scholarship request is not need-based.'''
* '''I prefer not to answer.'''

=== 6.5 Minority Status in the PS:1 Community (optional) ===
Do you self-identify as a minority in the PS:1 community? Examples include BIPOC individuals and people who identify as women or nonbinary, but you may answer based on your own lived experience.

* '''Yes'''
* '''No'''
* '''Prefer not to answer'''

== 7. Scoring Rubric ==
The Scholarship Committee uses the following rubric as a guideline for scoring. Multiple reviewers are encouraged, and scores may be averaged. The ranges below are suggested and may be scaled as needed, as long as the relative weights remain similar.

=== 7.1 Essay: Why would you like to be considered for a scholarship? (0–10 points) ===
* '''0–2 points''': Vague or incomplete; no clear personal motivation.
* '''3–5 points''': Some motivation described; limited connection to growth or barriers.
* '''6–8 points''': Clear, thoughtful reasoning; demonstrates how PS:1 would meaningfully benefit the applicant.
* '''9–10 points''': Exceptionally compelling; strong personal narrative, clear barriers, and high potential impact.

=== 7.2 Essay: What would you like to make or hack at PS:1? (0–10 points) ===
* '''0–2 points''': Minimal information; unclear what the applicant wants to do.
* '''3–5 points''': Some ideas but shallow detail; shows curiosity but not depth.
* '''6–8 points''': Clear goals; shows enthusiasm for making/learning; aligns with PS:1 tools and activities.
* '''9–10 points''': Highly creative, well thought-out goals; strong alignment with PS:1’s culture of experimentation.

=== 7.3 Essay: In your own words, what is the purpose of PS:1? (0–10 points) ===
* '''0–2 points''': Little understanding of PS:1 or community workshop ideas; generic or inaccurate answer.
* '''3–5 points''': Basic understanding of a makerspace/community workshop.
* '''6–8 points''': Good insight into the purpose and values of PS:1; shows a desire to participate and contribute.
* '''9–10 points''': Deep, thoughtful understanding; expresses values of collaboration, experimentation, and community.

=== 7.4 Financial Need (0–5 points, low weight) ===
* '''I would not be able to be a member without a scholarship.''' – +5 points
* '''It would be hard for me to be a member without a scholarship.''' – +4 points
* '''I can barely afford PS:1, but I could technically make it work.''' – +2 points
* '''My scholarship request is not need-based.''' – –1 to –2 points (mild negative weight; not disqualifying)
* '''I prefer not to answer.''' – 0 points (neutral)

Negative scoring for this field should be capped at –2 so that financial need does not overwhelm the rest of the rubric.

=== 7.5 Minority Status in the PS:1 Community (0–2 points, very low weight) ===
* '''Yes''' – +2 points
* '''No''' – 0 points
* '''Prefer not to answer''' – 0 points

This factor does not decide selection by itself, but is included to modestly prioritize applicants from underrepresented groups in the community.

== 8. Total Scoring and Selection ==
# A typical total score range is approximately 0–37 points using the rubric above.
# The Scholarship Committee may normalize or average scores across reviewers to account for different scoring styles.
# Final recommendations should consider both the numeric scores and the overall mix of recipients, with attention to:
## Alignment with PS:1’s purpose and culture,
## Diversity of projects and interests,
## Financial accessibility and equity,
## Overall community health and participation.
# Final approval of scholarship awards for each month rests with the Board, based on the recommendations of the Scholarship Committee.

[[Category:Policies]]
[[Category:Scholarships]]

Scholarship Policy 2026

2025-12-08T01:00:01Z

Jcmertz:

{{Note|type=warn|text=''This page contains the proposed Scholarship Policy referenced by the "[[Scholarship Policy Update Vote 2025]]" vote. If the vote passes, this page becomes the active Scholarship Policy for PS:1.''}}

== Overview ==
The PS:1 Scholarship Policy is intended to reduce financial barriers to membership, support a diverse and active community of makers and hackers, and align scholarship awards with the space’s purpose and values. Scholarships are time-limited memberships awarded through a recurring application and review process.

__TOC__

== 1. Scholarship Term ==
# Scholarships are awarded for a **six-month term**.
# Scholarship members have the same access and responsibilities as regular members during their term, unless otherwise noted in other policies.
# Scholarship recipients are subject to all clauses of the Membership Agreement and all other PS:1 policies. They may receive temporary or permanent bans for violations, the same as any other member.
# Scholarship terms begin on the first day of the month following selection.

== 2. Monthly Application and Selection Process ==
# PS:1 uses a **monthly scholarship cycle** rather than limited selection windows during the year.
# The scholarship application remains open year-round, with a clearly posted monthly deadline for each selection cycle.
# Applicants who are not selected in a given month **must reapply** to be considered again in future months.
# Continued interest—shown by reapplying, updating responses, and staying engaged—is included as a factor in the selection rubric.
# Applications are reviewed by the Scholarship Committee (or another committee designated by the Board) using the rubric in this policy.

== 3. Number of Scholarships Awarded Each Month ==
# The number of scholarships that **begin in a specific month** scales with the current membership count.
# The default formula is:

: '''0.5% of current dues-paying membership, rounded to the nearest whole number, with a minimum of 1 scholarship per month.'''

# Membership count for this purpose is determined as of the first day of the month in which the scholarship term begins.
# The Board may adjust the ratio by Board vote if membership levels or financial conditions change significantly. Any such change must be announced through PS:1’s official communication channels.

== 4. Scholarship Extension ==
# Scholarship recipients may request a **six-month extension** during the final month of their scholarship term.
# To request an extension, the recipient must attend a Board meeting and give a short presentation that covers:
## What they’ve accomplished during their first five months at PS:1;
## How the scholarship has supported their work and participation in the community;
## Their goals and plans for the next six months if the scholarship is extended.
# After the presentation, the Board will vote to approve or deny the extension.
# Each scholarship can be extended once under this policy, unless changed by a future member vote.

== 5. Administration ==
# The Scholarship Committee (or another committee designated by the Board) is responsible for:
## Maintaining and publishing the scholarship application,
## Reviewing and scoring applications using the rubric in this policy,
## Recommending finalists for each monthly cycle,
## Tracking scholarship start and end dates in the membership system,
## Coordinating with the Board on extension requests and approvals.
# The Scholarship Committee may adopt additional internal processes and guidelines to carry out this policy, as long as they do not conflict with the language of this policy or other PS:1 policies.
# The Scholarship Committee may modify the scholarship application questions and scoring rubric at any time, provided that:
## Any changes are announced via PS:1’s official communication channels (for example, mailing list, forums, and/or Discord as appropriate), and
## This policy page is updated to reflect the current application and rubric.

== 6. Scholarship Application Questions ==
Applicants must answer all required questions honestly and to the best of their ability. The current standard application includes:

=== 6.1 Why would you like to be considered for a scholarship? ===
''Please write 1–3 paragraphs.''

Tell us what brings you to PS:1 at this point in your life. What opportunities would a scholarship unlock for you? How would it support your goals, interests, or growth?

=== 6.2 What would you like to make or hack at PS:1? ===
''Please write 1–3 paragraphs.''

You do not need to have a fully formed project. Curiosity and exploration are welcome. Tell us what tools, skills, or ideas excite you and what you hope to learn or create at the space.

=== 6.3 In your own words, what is the purpose of PS:1? ===
''Please write 1–3 paragraphs.''

There are no right or wrong answers. We want to understand your perspective. What do you think a community workshop/makerspace is for? How do you imagine participating in and contributing to PS:1?

=== 6.4 Financial Need (multiple choice) ===
''This field has lower weight than the essays but is still considered.''

Which of the following best describes your financial situation in relation to PS:1 membership?

* '''I would not be able to be a member of PS:1 without a scholarship.'''
* '''It would be hard for me to be a member without a scholarship.'''
* '''I can barely afford PS:1, but I could technically make it work.'''
* '''My scholarship request is not need-based.'''
* '''I prefer not to answer.'''

=== 6.5 Minority Status in the PS:1 Community (optional) ===
Do you self-identify as a minority in the PS:1 community? Examples include BIPOC individuals and people who identify as women or nonbinary, but you may answer based on your own lived experience.

* '''Yes'''
* '''No'''
* '''Prefer not to answer'''

== 7. Scoring Rubric ==
The Scholarship Committee uses the following rubric as a guideline for scoring. Multiple reviewers are encouraged, and scores may be averaged. The ranges below are suggested and may be scaled as needed, as long as the relative weights remain similar.

=== 7.1 Essay: Why would you like to be considered for a scholarship? (0–10 points) ===
* '''0–2 points''': Vague or incomplete; no clear personal motivation.
* '''3–5 points''': Some motivation described; limited connection to growth or barriers.
* '''6–8 points''': Clear, thoughtful reasoning; demonstrates how PS:1 would meaningfully benefit the applicant.
* '''9–10 points''': Exceptionally compelling; strong personal narrative, clear barriers, and high potential impact.

=== 7.2 Essay: What would you like to make or hack at PS:1? (0–10 points) ===
* '''0–2 points''': Minimal information; unclear what the applicant wants to do.
* '''3–5 points''': Some ideas but shallow detail; shows curiosity but not depth.
* '''6–8 points''': Clear goals; shows enthusiasm for making/learning; aligns with PS:1 tools and activities.
* '''9–10 points''': Highly creative, well thought-out goals; strong alignment with PS:1’s culture of experimentation.

=== 7.3 Essay: In your own words, what is the purpose of PS:1? (0–10 points) ===
* '''0–2 points''': Little understanding of PS:1 or community workshop ideas; generic or inaccurate answer.
* '''3–5 points''': Basic understanding of a makerspace/community workshop.
* '''6–8 points''': Good insight into the purpose and values of PS:1; shows a desire to participate and contribute.
* '''9–10 points''': Deep, thoughtful understanding; expresses values of collaboration, experimentation, and community.

=== 7.4 Financial Need (0–5 points, low weight) ===
* '''I would not be able to be a member without a scholarship.''' – +5 points
* '''It would be hard for me to be a member without a scholarship.''' – +4 points
* '''I can barely afford PS:1, but I could technically make it work.''' – +2 points
* '''My scholarship request is not need-based.''' – –1 to –2 points (mild negative weight; not disqualifying)
* '''I prefer not to answer.''' – 0 points (neutral)

Negative scoring for this field should be capped at –2 so that financial need does not overwhelm the rest of the rubric.

=== 7.5 Minority Status in the PS:1 Community (0–2 points, very low weight) ===
* '''Yes''' – +2 points
* '''No''' – 0 points
* '''Prefer not to answer''' – 0 points

This factor does not decide selection by itself, but is included to modestly prioritize applicants from underrepresented groups in the community.

== 8. Total Scoring and Selection ==
# A typical total score range is approximately 0–37 points using the rubric above.
# The Scholarship Committee may normalize or average scores across reviewers to account for different scoring styles.
# Final recommendations should consider both the numeric scores and the overall mix of recipients, with attention to:
## Alignment with PS:1’s purpose and culture,
## Diversity of projects and interests,
## Financial accessibility and equity,
## Overall community health and participation.
# Final approval of scholarship awards for each month rests with the Board, based on the recommendations of the Scholarship Committee.

[[Category:Policies]]
[[Category:Scholarships]]

Scholarship Policy 2026

2025-12-08T00:58:59Z

Jcmertz:

{{Note|type=warn|text=''This page contains the proposed Scholarship Policy referenced by the "[[Scholarship Policy Update Vote 2025]]" vote. If the vote passes, this page becomes the active Scholarship Policy for PS:1.''}}

<span> <h1> Overview </h1>
The PS:1 Scholarship Policy is intended to reduce financial barriers to membership, support a diverse and active community of makers and hackers, and align scholarship awards with the space’s purpose and values. Scholarships are time-limited memberships awarded through a recurring application and review process.
</span>
__TOC__

== 1. Scholarship Term ==
# Scholarships are awarded for a **six-month term**.
# Scholarship members have the same access and responsibilities as regular members during their term, unless otherwise noted in other policies.
# Scholarship recipients are subject to all clauses of the Membership Agreement and all other PS:1 policies. They may receive temporary or permanent bans for violations, the same as any other member.
# Scholarship terms begin on the first day of the month following selection.

== 2. Monthly Application and Selection Process ==
# PS:1 uses a **monthly scholarship cycle** rather than limited selection windows during the year.
# The scholarship application remains open year-round, with a clearly posted monthly deadline for each selection cycle.
# Applicants who are not selected in a given month **must reapply** to be considered again in future months.
# Continued interest—shown by reapplying, updating responses, and staying engaged—is included as a factor in the selection rubric.
# Applications are reviewed by the Scholarship Committee (or another committee designated by the Board) using the rubric in this policy.

== 3. Number of Scholarships Awarded Each Month ==
# The number of scholarships that **begin in a specific month** scales with the current membership count.
# The default formula is:

: '''0.5% of current dues-paying membership, rounded to the nearest whole number, with a minimum of 1 scholarship per month.'''

# Membership count for this purpose is determined as of the first day of the month in which the scholarship term begins.
# The Board may adjust the ratio by Board vote if membership levels or financial conditions change significantly. Any such change must be announced through PS:1’s official communication channels.

== 4. Scholarship Extension ==
# Scholarship recipients may request a **six-month extension** during the final month of their scholarship term.
# To request an extension, the recipient must attend a Board meeting and give a short presentation that covers:
## What they’ve accomplished during their first five months at PS:1;
## How the scholarship has supported their work and participation in the community;
## Their goals and plans for the next six months if the scholarship is extended.
# After the presentation, the Board will vote to approve or deny the extension.
# Each scholarship can be extended once under this policy, unless changed by a future member vote.

== 5. Administration ==
# The Scholarship Committee (or another committee designated by the Board) is responsible for:
## Maintaining and publishing the scholarship application,
## Reviewing and scoring applications using the rubric in this policy,
## Recommending finalists for each monthly cycle,
## Tracking scholarship start and end dates in the membership system,
## Coordinating with the Board on extension requests and approvals.
# The Scholarship Committee may adopt additional internal processes and guidelines to carry out this policy, as long as they do not conflict with the language of this policy or other PS:1 policies.
# The Scholarship Committee may modify the scholarship application questions and scoring rubric at any time, provided that:
## Any changes are announced via PS:1’s official communication channels (for example, mailing list, forums, and/or Discord as appropriate), and
## This policy page is updated to reflect the current application and rubric.

== 6. Scholarship Application Questions ==
Applicants must answer all required questions honestly and to the best of their ability. The current standard application includes:

=== 6.1 Why would you like to be considered for a scholarship? ===
''Please write 1–3 paragraphs.''

Tell us what brings you to PS:1 at this point in your life. What opportunities would a scholarship unlock for you? How would it support your goals, interests, or growth?

=== 6.2 What would you like to make or hack at PS:1? ===
''Please write 1–3 paragraphs.''

You do not need to have a fully formed project. Curiosity and exploration are welcome. Tell us what tools, skills, or ideas excite you and what you hope to learn or create at the space.

=== 6.3 In your own words, what is the purpose of PS:1? ===
''Please write 1–3 paragraphs.''

There are no right or wrong answers. We want to understand your perspective. What do you think a community workshop/makerspace is for? How do you imagine participating in and contributing to PS:1?

=== 6.4 Financial Need (multiple choice) ===
''This field has lower weight than the essays but is still considered.''

Which of the following best describes your financial situation in relation to PS:1 membership?

* '''I would not be able to be a member of PS:1 without a scholarship.'''
* '''It would be hard for me to be a member without a scholarship.'''
* '''I can barely afford PS:1, but I could technically make it work.'''
* '''My scholarship request is not need-based.'''
* '''I prefer not to answer.'''

=== 6.5 Minority Status in the PS:1 Community (optional) ===
Do you self-identify as a minority in the PS:1 community? Examples include BIPOC individuals and people who identify as women or nonbinary, but you may answer based on your own lived experience.

* '''Yes'''
* '''No'''
* '''Prefer not to answer'''

== 7. Scoring Rubric ==
The Scholarship Committee uses the following rubric as a guideline for scoring. Multiple reviewers are encouraged, and scores may be averaged. The ranges below are suggested and may be scaled as needed, as long as the relative weights remain similar.

=== 7.1 Essay: Why would you like to be considered for a scholarship? (0–10 points) ===
* '''0–2 points''': Vague or incomplete; no clear personal motivation.
* '''3–5 points''': Some motivation described; limited connection to growth or barriers.
* '''6–8 points''': Clear, thoughtful reasoning; demonstrates how PS:1 would meaningfully benefit the applicant.
* '''9–10 points''': Exceptionally compelling; strong personal narrative, clear barriers, and high potential impact.

=== 7.2 Essay: What would you like to make or hack at PS:1? (0–10 points) ===
* '''0–2 points''': Minimal information; unclear what the applicant wants to do.
* '''3–5 points''': Some ideas but shallow detail; shows curiosity but not depth.
* '''6–8 points''': Clear goals; shows enthusiasm for making/learning; aligns with PS:1 tools and activities.
* '''9–10 points''': Highly creative, well thought-out goals; strong alignment with PS:1’s culture of experimentation.

=== 7.3 Essay: In your own words, what is the purpose of PS:1? (0–10 points) ===
* '''0–2 points''': Little understanding of PS:1 or community workshop ideas; generic or inaccurate answer.
* '''3–5 points''': Basic understanding of a makerspace/community workshop.
* '''6–8 points''': Good insight into the purpose and values of PS:1; shows a desire to participate and contribute.
* '''9–10 points''': Deep, thoughtful understanding; expresses values of collaboration, experimentation, and community.

=== 7.4 Financial Need (0–5 points, low weight) ===
* '''I would not be able to be a member without a scholarship.''' – +5 points
* '''It would be hard for me to be a member without a scholarship.''' – +4 points
* '''I can barely afford PS:1, but I could technically make it work.''' – +2 points
* '''My scholarship request is not need-based.''' – –1 to –2 points (mild negative weight; not disqualifying)
* '''I prefer not to answer.''' – 0 points (neutral)

Negative scoring for this field should be capped at –2 so that financial need does not overwhelm the rest of the rubric.

=== 7.5 Minority Status in the PS:1 Community (0–2 points, very low weight) ===
* '''Yes''' – +2 points
* '''No''' – 0 points
* '''Prefer not to answer''' – 0 points

This factor does not decide selection by itself, but is included to modestly prioritize applicants from underrepresented groups in the community.

== 8. Total Scoring and Selection ==
# A typical total score range is approximately 0–37 points using the rubric above.
# The Scholarship Committee may normalize or average scores across reviewers to account for different scoring styles.
# Final recommendations should consider both the numeric scores and the overall mix of recipients, with attention to:
## Alignment with PS:1’s purpose and culture,
## Diversity of projects and interests,
## Financial accessibility and equity,
## Overall community health and participation.
# Final approval of scholarship awards for each month rests with the Board, based on the recommendations of the Scholarship Committee.

[[Category:Policies]]
[[Category:Scholarships]]